Paleo Diet: Raw Paleo Diet and Lifestyle Forum
Raw Paleo Diet Forums => Off Topic => Topic started by: goodsamaritan on March 18, 2012, 11:29:11 am
-
Tubal Sterilization Epidemic Extreme Warning, Be Aware! Tubal Reversal in High Demand!
Tubal Ligation or Tubal Sterilization has reached epidemic mass marketing promotions in our country. What woman hasn’t been saturated with the mass marketing lie of this vastly injurious procedure? Oh it is injurious alright, how do you explain being disabled of the ability to reproduce? That by definition is injury. Plus the various VERY REAL side effects encapsulated in what is known as POST TUBAL LIGATION SYNDROME? Bet the pro-tubal ligation marketers didn’t tell you that… falsely marketing tubal sterilization as “SAFE”… big lie!
http://www.myhealthblog.org/2012/03/18/tubal-sterilization-epidemic-extreme-warning-be-aware-tubal-reversal-in-high-demand/ (http://www.myhealthblog.org/2012/03/18/tubal-sterilization-epidemic-extreme-warning-be-aware-tubal-reversal-in-high-demand/)
-
People are just fucked. Cutting off foreskins, clitorises, stuffing silicone in to slices in their bodies, transferring fat from here to there, cutting off pieces of the face and finally sterilizing themselves. What the fuck!
-
For people in the 3rd world, contraception might be difficult to obtain. I can understand why tubal ligation is wanted by so many people there since a woman might not want to have children but her partner might refuse to use contraception. In India, I note that a man there has banned people in his village from having more than 2 children, the idea being that having fewer children will lead to greater wealth for the parents.
-
That's always the economic argument case.
And the tubal sterilization pushers conveniently LIE straight faced that this procedure is entirely SAFE... it is not... and the side effects should be listed well in advance so that people can make a truly informed choice... instead of being CONNED.
-
the idea being that having fewer children will lead to greater wealth for the parents.
While the health hazards of tubal ligation has been known for a long time, restricting family size is not primarily about assuring greater wealth for the parents. Rather, it is about the size of the urban infrastructure that is sustaining a given population. Urban infrastructure capacity is not a concern in a rural setting. However, urban services, such as potable water, sanitation, transportation, education, health-care delivery, cannot always increase in proportion to unrestrained urban population growth.
I live in an area where this is a big problem. Here is one small example: Schools were built 20 years ago in neighborhoods which had an average family size of, say, 3 children per house. Now, there are three families per house, with an average of 5 children per family. This means that the number of schoolchildren per house has increased five-fold. Schools bring in portable classrooms (trailers) for the overflow of students, but this is still not sufficient.
This is just one aspect of unrestrained urban population growth. I do not think sterilization is the answer... until people decide to reproduce responsibly, this problem will continue.