Title: Re: Human breast-milk even healthier than thought
Post by: dariorpl on August 27, 2016, 10:08:49 am
Humans are one of the most, if not the most toxin filled species in the planet. Human milk, while genetically may be superior, is some of the worst quality milk you can give to a baby. There's really two main reasons why it's found to have such beneficial effects, the first and most important, is because the comparison is being made between babies fed raw breastmilk versus those being fed pasteurized cow milk or pasteurized baby formula. The second, and possibly the least important, is that breastfed babies experience warm skin on skin contact which is natural for them during feeding, whereas others may not.
It would be interesting to see a study comparing babies that are bottle fed organic, grass fed, pasteurized cow milk, versus babies who are bottle fed the pasteurized breastmilk of their mothers.
Title: Re: Human breast-milk even healthier than thought
Post by: TylerDurden on August 27, 2016, 03:40:14 pm
The latter would still be healthier on human breast-milk as the mother alters the milk composition in her baby's favour all the time:-
Basically, the special compounds found in human breast-milk that help human babies are not found in raw cows' milk, however grassfed. Raw cow's milk is a food specifically designed by Nature to get a calf to grow to adult size within a couple of years, it is not meant for humans.. Indeed the extra hormones in raw cow's milk can cause additionial health-problems for humans. PLus, RVAF diet eating mothers will be able to detox poisons more effectively so that the baby is less affected.