Print Page - 'Cooked Meat Paleo' to 'Raw Meat Paleo'
Paleo Diet: Raw Paleo Diet and Lifestyle Forum
Raw Paleo Diet Forums => General Discussion => Topic started by: miles on August 30, 2009, 12:35:22 am
Title: 'Cooked Meat Paleo' to 'Raw Meat Paleo'
Post by: miles on August 30, 2009, 12:35:22 am
I currently eat a paleo diet with cooked meat, and am considering trying it with raw meat. I would like to know what changes people experience as a result of switching: Positive and Negative... (e.g. Changes in energy levels/ physical 'downtime' after meals & Experiences with Bacteria/Parasites)
N.B. I am only interested in the difference between CMP and RMP, and not the difference between RMP and any other diet.
Thank you.
Title: Re: 'Cooked Meat Paleo' to 'Raw Meat Paleo'
Post by: lex_rooker on August 30, 2009, 02:08:22 am
I suppose this question boils down to what you mean by cooked. If you are talking rare to medium rare then there is a good chance that most people would find little significant difference. If you are talking medium well to well done then the differences may be more obvious.
My experience also points to the fact that time plays an important role here. Many cooked vs raw problems (and benefits) may take years to manifest themselves. If you are looking for a magic bullet that will cure all your ills over night, and you've already taken the most important step by moving to a paleo type diet, moving from lightly or moderately cooked to completely raw may not show much return in the short term.
I personally found that lightly cooked paleo (sometimes rare but mostly medium rare) gave me about 90% of the benefits. There have been some incremental improvements since I moved to all raw several years ago, but it has taken 3 to 4 years for these minor improvements to occur and I can't even say that they wouldn't have occurred if I had stayed with the lightly cooked protocol.
Probably not what you wanted to hear but it is the best information that I can provide,
Lex
Title: Re: 'Cooked Meat Paleo' to 'Raw Meat Paleo'
Post by: miles on August 30, 2009, 03:42:31 am
I have, so far, been using mince for several reasons: Speed of cooking(microwaving), Price(generally cheaper, I guess because it packs more efficiently), and because I can get it with a lot of fat, which I can choose to leave or eat depending on how I feel, because a lot of it comes out in the microwaving anyway.
Getting mince means I have to cook it to well-done though, as far as I know. But on the issue of time, if I were to buy solid meat and simmer the outer edge/cook rare, then it wouldn't take long anyway.
Also, I am an athlete, so any improvement is important to me.
_________________________________________
What about parasites and bacteria? I read that these are more prevalent in grain-fed meat than grass-fed as well.
Title: Re: 'Cooked Meat Paleo' to 'Raw Meat Paleo'
Post by: TylerDurden on August 30, 2009, 04:48:35 am
IMO, cooked palaeolithic diets offer some health-benefits re auto-immune-diseases etc. BUT, going fully raw confers FAR more benefits(50%+). For example, my own health-problems were adrenal-related, so that I couldn't digest properly any cooked animal food whatsoever. The result was that cooked-palaeo did f*ck all for me, but rawpalaeo saved my life.
Title: Re: 'Cooked Meat Paleo' to 'Raw Meat Paleo'
Post by: Guittarman03 on August 30, 2009, 05:10:01 am
I've come to the conclusion that the real demons lie in cooked fats. Carbs are relatively unnaffected by cooking (except enzymes and nutrient value), but the basic structure remains in tact. I have not noticed much difference in raw or cooked fruits/veggies. The fats however not only lose enzymes and nutrients, but their molecular structure changes and can wreak havoc on the body. This is evidence by the fact that the body will surge white blood cells (responsible for eliminating unwanted/dangerous particles in the blood stream) when eating cooked meat, but this will not happen when eating raw.
To answer your question from a practical sense, if you start eating your meat mostly raw, you can expect better and faster digestion and absorption of nutrients (b/c of the enzymes and b/c now your body is not dealing with toxic fats). You will be able to eat a big meal, but still feel somewhat light. This will give your body more time/resources for recovery, and will lead to faster recovery.
As far as grainfed parasites/bacteria, I eat grainfed almost exclusively and have no problems. Don't get your food from Wal-Mart is a good start (they get the cheapest, lowest quality bulk stuff possible), at least go somewhere where they don't give hormone and antibiotics to thier beef (like wholefoods). Grassfed is ideal though.
You will find eating lots of raw steak (I get chuck steaks b/c lots of fat) is actually pretty convienient. It's easy, no prep necessary, and you can carry around alot of calories with little effort. Just 1.5 - 2 lbs of meat is enough to at least get me through a day, though I will usually prefer a little more.
Title: Re: 'Cooked Meat Paleo' to 'Raw Meat Paleo'
Post by: lex_rooker on August 30, 2009, 06:08:26 am
Getting mince means I have to cook it to well-done though, as far as I know.
I only eat mince and I eat it raw and have done so for almost 4 years now and have not had a problem. I regularly eat ground meat that is meant as pet food so it is not prepared or inspected to meet health standards - still no problem.
Also, I am an athlete, so any improvement is important to me.
Raw or cooked will not be a significant defining difference in athletic performance. The real choice is whether to include carbs or go Zero carb. Both have pluses and minuses. You will be able to handle high intensity efforts (intense weight lifting, windsprints, etc) where muscles must be efficient in anaerobic conditions better if you include carbs. Zero Carb lends itself to long term energy expenditures where aerobic conditions are the norm. It really has nothing to do with whether your food is raw or cooked. If you want to spend a lot of time planning an optimal diet for athletic performance then you would want a Cyclic Ketogenic Diet (CKD) where you eat ZC 6 days per week and then add a good bit of carbs once per week. This is supposed to give you the best of both worlds. There are rules as to when you are allowed the carbs and how much. The best source for information on this is Lyle McDonald. He has a rather pricey book on the subject which is available on the web. Just Google Lyle McDonald ultimate diet 2.0 and you'll find lots of information.
What about parasites and bacteria? I read that these are more prevalent in grain-fed meat than grass-fed as well.
My personal take is that today it really doesn't matter. 15-20 years ago e-coli 0157H was pretty much limited to feedlots where animals were grain finished. Over the years the waste from these feedlots has been distributed all over as 'fertilizer' and therefore contaminated just about everything equally. You see, grass fed animals will not provide the conditions to 'create' the acid resistant version of e-coli, but the acid resistant version of e-coli is equally happy in grass fed animals as well. So today, grass fed animals will pick up the bad strain of e-coli from the environment. There are several studies that show this. The best you can do is find a meat supplier you trust and just don’t worry about it. Many of us have been eating our meat raw for a lot of years and the most we ever get are occasional loose stools. I only know of one person who actually became ill from eating raw meat and I think the final culture said he had salmonella – 1 out of several hundred over 3 or 4 years. Not bad odds.
Lex
Title: Re: 'Cooked Meat Paleo' to 'Raw Meat Paleo'
Post by: goodsamaritan on August 30, 2009, 06:15:35 am
I agree with the cooked FATS is TOXIC issue.
You can eat a lot more RAW FATS because it is non-toxic. You can safely increase your fat intake with raw fats.
COOKED FATS are TOXIC because everyone experiences what in our words is "UMAY" or a feeling of "STOP" when eating COOKED FATS... which never happens when you eat RAW FAT.
I experimented with cooked meat paleo diet last year when I was curious with homo optimus diet. My experiment wasn't too scientific though because I GRILLED commercially farmed PORK (not organic)... and I felt really bad after 30 days I had to stop my cooked paleo diet experiment. It's unfair because when I do raw paleo diet I eat grass fed organic beef and wild ocean fish... which in the first place I cannot stand to really cook because cooking grass fed beef and wild ocean fish tastes awful and seems like a total waste of money.
I think that grilling introduces toxins / poisons with the smoke of the charcoal sticking to the meat. You can see it when you are cooking. Plus any burnt portions. Cooking pollutes food. Of course one form of cooking is more polluting than others.
When the raw vegan healers say MEAT is toxic to the body... they point to COOKED MEAT. Not raw meat.
Downtime after a meal? I feel sluggish and sleepy after a cooked meat meal. I do not feel anything after a raw meat meal.
Cooked meat makes me thirsty. Raw meat hydrates me.
I'm not an athlete though, I do know that depending on the sport of the athlete you need a lot of carbs for explosive power. I've read before some heated discussion between Barry Groves and a cyclist athlete (Angelo?) in the raw paleo diet yahoo groups and Angelo says he needed a certain amount of carbs.
Title: Re: 'Cooked Meat Paleo' to 'Raw Meat Paleo'
Post by: PaleoPhil on August 30, 2009, 06:27:58 am
My experience has been similar to Lex's, although my small benefits seem to have come quickly, so maybe I have benefited more from raw. I'll know better after I've reached fully raw if I then experiment with all cooked meat, to be able to contrast very different levels of cooking. Going from majority-cooked ZC to mostly-raw carnivorous has had small but significant benefits so far, such as feeling a bit better and having a somewhat better functioning GI system. I find raw meats and eggs to be easier to digest than cooked.
Eliminating carbs provided the biggest benefits for me (especially gluten-grains and other grains, milk, legumes, tubers, nightshades, winter squashes and tropical fruits).
Title: Re: 'Cooked Meat Paleo' to 'Raw Meat Paleo'
Post by: wodgina on August 30, 2009, 06:40:51 am
I pretty much eat only mince, have done for 3 years and have never been sick.
Title: Re: 'Cooked Meat Paleo' to 'Raw Meat Paleo'
Post by: miles on August 30, 2009, 06:48:29 am
IMO, cooked palaeolithic diets offer some health-benefits re auto-immune-diseases etc. BUT, going fully raw confers FAR more benefits(50%+). For example, my own health-problems were adrenal-related, so that I couldn't digest properly any cooked animal food whatsoever. The result was that cooked-palaeo did f*ck all for me, but rawpalaeo saved my life.
My experience has been similar to Lex's. Going from majority-cooked ZC to mostly-raw carnivorous has had small but significant benefits so far, such as feeling a bit better and having a somewhat better functioning GI system. I find raw meats and eggs to be easier to digest than cooked.
To answer your question from a practical sense, if you start eating your meat mostly raw, you can expect better and faster digestion and absorption of nutrients (b/c of the enzymes and b/c now your body is not dealing with toxic fats). You will be able to eat a big meal, but still feel somewhat light. This will give your body more time/resources for recovery, and will lead to faster recovery.
More suggestions that raw meat digests faster and would mean less downtime and grogginess. It seems to me that this could make rather a large difference to me...
I only know of one person who actually became ill from eating raw meat and I think the final culture said he had salmonella – 1 out of several hundred over 3 or 4 years. Not bad odds.
Would this be because of the type of meat he ate? Or because he was already ill and his immune system was weak? I have read that something like 60% or chicken is infected with salmonella, and 60% is infected with some other equally dangerous bacteria..
As well as Cow muscle, do you consider organs, and meat from other animals such as pigs, chickens, turkeys and fish to be as safe? (For bacteria and parasites[worms])
Or will the body be able to deal with these anyway?
I pretty much eat only mince, have done for 3 years and have never been sick.
All right. I thought mince was bad because any bacteria would be mixed throughout and meat from different sources all mixed in together, but then I suppose that only matters if you're going to cook the outside of it =) It seems like it would be kind of sickly though, compared to solid meat? Possibly it would digest even easier though? But then, that is more processing and couldn't some beneficial properties of the meat that are preserved by not cooking be lost anyway?
_________________________
Title: Re: 'Cooked Meat Paleo' to 'Raw Meat Paleo'
Post by: miles on August 30, 2009, 07:22:04 am
Got some Irish Beef mince in the fridge, from ASDA... I am tempted to go and try it raw. The benefits I have heard sound great and am now eager to try it out.
Issues I'm still not sure on though are 1)Parasites, 2)What meats are suitable to eat raw other than Beef Muscle (different animals e.g. Fish, Pork, Chicken, Turkey/parts of animals e.g. Organs [People seem to advocated consumption of organs, but with cooked I avoided them because of the extreme levels of fat-soluble vitamins which will build up in the body) 3)How to know if the meat is grass-fed. 4) Whether organic is worth it.
Thank you for all the replies I have been receiving so far.
Title: Re: 'Cooked Meat Paleo' to 'Raw Meat Paleo'
Post by: PaleoPhil on August 30, 2009, 07:36:57 am
I think wild and near-wild (pasture fed) animal fats are probably the healthiest of all foods, since brains and marrow were a dietary staple for hominids (even carrion stripped of all meat and organs would have offered brains and marrow to hominids that came upon it and could crack open the bones with stones--combine this with the brains and marrow that they got from hunted kills and kills stolen from other predator animals and you can easily imagine that they ate quite a bit). That's why so many people take fish oil and cod liver supplements--even people who call themselves vegetarians!--as fish are one of the last wild animal food sources left on earth in some abundance (though even they are quickly being decimated) and fish oils are therefore one of the few sources of wild animal fats still left and study after study has shown benefits from consuming them.
Brains are hard to come by these days, but wild and grassfed sources of fat can be had: such as grassfed marrow and suet and ground or chopped meats that contain fat and wild fatty fish and fish oil / cod liver oil supplements.
Title: Re: 'Cooked Meat Paleo' to 'Raw Meat Paleo'
Post by: lex_rooker on August 30, 2009, 07:50:00 am
Miles, The human animal is pretty tough. We evolved eating meat that was full of bacteria. For millions of years there were no refrigerators, freezers, canning equipement, or chemicals (other than salt and there is controversy to whether we used salt at all). In short, we hunted and killed animals for food. We dressed them on the ground with wooden sticks and crude stone tools. Within hours the warm meat would be swarming with bacteria. This is the way of life for all animals in the wild. Their food, whether plant or animal based, is not aniceptic. Many here make and eat "high" meat, which is just meat that has been allowed to grow lots of bacteria - in otherwords, it's slowly rotting.
I do keep the bulk of my food frozen. I defrost and prepare about a weeks worth at a time and store it in the refrigerator. Early in the morning I pull out the days portion and let it warm up, often for 10 hours or so, and sometimes in a hot car, until I'm ready to eat it. By the time I get around to eating it, it is often full of bacteria as evidenced by a rather sour taste (which I actually have come to enjoy). Most of us were initially concerened with bacteria and parasites, but after a few weeks or months we found we didn't die nor did we even become sick and so we just stopped worrying about it.
I eat organs as part of the pet food I add to my food mix. I prefer to get a wide variety of organs and mix it with regular muscle meats than to eat individual organ meats separately. Either way is fine as the people who eat whole organ meats are doing great as well. My way is just my preference. About 10% to 15% of my total meat intake is from organs. The rest is fat and muscle.
Not sure why you are concerned with toxic vitamin overload from eating organ meats. I know of no such case ever happening on a paleo style diet. Usually you get to the point where you just don’t want anymore of whatever food you are eating long before vitamin toxicity sets in. As an example, you might get to the point where another bite of liver and you think you’ll vomit, but kidney, heart, spleen, muscle meats and fat all sound great. Your body knows what’s best and will not let you overdo it unless you ignore it and force yourself to go against how you feel.
Organic is a total waste of money. It is totally meaningless as there is no standard definition for it. Feedlot meat is by definition “organic” if the animals ate organic grains (whatever that means). This doesn’t make them any healthier.
There are several grassfed meat producers here in north America and they are easily accessed on the web. Just Google “grass fed meat” and you’ll get dozens of hits. The UK and Europe are a different matter. Maybe Tyler can help you there since he is in the UK.
Lex
Title: Re: 'Cooked Meat Paleo' to 'Raw Meat Paleo'
Post by: miles on August 30, 2009, 08:07:31 am
I do keep the bulk of my food frozen. I defrost and prepare about a weeks worth at a time and store it in the refrigerator. Early in the morning I pull out the days portion and let it warm up, often for 10 hours or so, and sometimes in a hot car, until I'm ready to eat it. By the time I get around to eating it, it is often full of bacteria as evidenced by a rather sour taste (which I actually have come to enjoy). Most of us were initially concerened with bacteria and parasites, but after a few weeks or months we found we didn't die nor did we even become sick and so we just stopped worrying about it.
I'm getting more comfortable with this now..
However, I've also read that freezing for 48hrs should kill parasites in some meats and freezing for a month should do it in others. Is it widespread within the RPD community to freeze meat for a period before consumption? Or just for convenience because you buy on bulk?
Tapeworm is pretty serious.. There are places where it's really common, I would be interested to know what communities it is particularly prevalent in. The worm eggs that wait in cysts in animal tissue are gruesome. People have mentioned bacteria, and I'm relatively happy about that now, but I don't recall anyone commenting in response to parasites yet... Or even about Pork/Poultry/Fish.. Poultry and Pork especially, people won't even eat rare usually, unlike with beef. Perhaps Pork and Poultry are unnecessary? Fish is eaten raw in Sushi, but part of the preparation is freezing for a period to kill parasites.
There are several grassfed meat producers here in north America and they are easily accessed on the web. Just Google “grass fed meat” and you’ll get dozens of hits. The UK and Europe are a different matter. Maybe Tyler can help you there since he is in the UK.
Yes, I would appreciate some info on that if possible Tyler, if you read this. I'm not sure what the equivalent to grass-fed would be in the case of poultry and pork for example... maybe it'll be best to just leave them off. Fish equivalent is 'obviously' just wild.
Title: Re: 'Cooked Meat Paleo' to 'Raw Meat Paleo'
Post by: Neone on August 31, 2009, 06:10:52 am
Miles, for the love of god, do NOT microwave your meat! holy smokes, if you're doing this diet for health then why would you go and zap all the 'good shit' out of your meat? I think that if you're eating a healthy (at least mostly) carnivorous diet stuff like tapeworms probobly wouldnt do too well in your intestines since there wouldnt be much for them to eat? Fresh is best, i would rather let my meat sit in the fridge for four weeks and eat it high than freeze it..
this is all just gut instinct, take it for what its worth.
Title: Re: 'Cooked Meat Paleo' to 'Raw Meat Paleo'
Post by: miles on August 31, 2009, 10:05:54 am
I think that if you're eating a healthy (at least mostly) carnivorous diet stuff like tapeworms probobly wouldnt do too well in your intestines since there wouldnt be much for them to eat?
What do tapeworms eat?
Also, Neone, what sort of meat to do eat?
____________________________________
Tonight I 'cooked' ~500g 'Irish Beef Mince' from ASDA in the oven at 100ºC for about 45mins in total... It was quite hard to eat, I spent a long time and probably managed ~3/4 of the meat, but didn't touch the liquid fat in the bottom. When I say it was hard to eat, I don't mean to chew; I 'cooked' it just enough so it was all a very pale brownish colour(it seems to transition instantly from perfect raw-red to this colour at a certain temperature, so I just got all of it to this point), but to me it tasted very raw(which was kind of the idea), except that the iron smell wasn't so strong. Suitably, I was eating it whilst watching(on tv - duh) some UK citizens eating raw reindeer on the show 'tough guy or chicken'. It was as if my body could only just handle it though, and perhaps I would have been sick if I'd eaten any more/any faster. I did also pass some silent wind, which I am guessing was something to do with the bacteria?(it went freely too.. no bloating or discomfort like what I used to get(still would if I ate it) from eating grains/legumes).
Something else: Some(perhaps many) people here think that one should not suffer negative effects from parasites/bacteria if follow the raw-paleo diet; in that case, I would guess that animals(e.g. Cattle) would be less likely to suffer from them on their own natural diet. However(I realise there are many other cases for eating grass-fed cattle for example), in THAT particular respect, eating 'natural-fed' animals should not make a difference(if gut parasites/bacteria would not negatively affect a raw-paleo 'dieter' anyway). Hmm?
Title: Re: 'Cooked Meat Paleo' to 'Raw Meat Paleo'
Post by: Raw Kyle on August 31, 2009, 10:14:41 am
Hey miles, I've said this before in other threads but figured I'd put it here since it appears relevant. Every time I ever added a new raw animal flesh food to my diet I went through a period where at first it was either mildly or sometimes very revolting. By that I mean that the idea of it was scary or disgusting, I was afraid it might make me sick, and the taste and texture did not appeal to me. I would either force a bunch down or eat until I felt I couldn't anymore like you did. This always gave way to it becoming neutral, neither desirable nor disgusting. It because mechanical, chewing just to get it down with no pleasure. Then slowly it because pleasurable to eat. It happened fastest with muscle meat as this is closest to stuff I was used to (cooked meat, sashimi, things "normal" people eat these days) and slowest with organs. In fact organs are still a bit bad tasting to me, maybe bad is the wrong word, but strong in a way I don't particularly like. Fat is neutral to tasty for me now, depending on the particular variances of the fat I'm eating that day.
Title: Re: 'Cooked Meat Paleo' to 'Raw Meat Paleo'
Post by: phatdave on August 31, 2009, 10:45:48 am
Ive noticed one massive problem with the way i got about things. Hunger. You have to be really hungry, and out of the cycle of usual eating. I really find having food whenever i want not quite right. Wait a while, and its funny how real hunger resets things.
Anyways, thats with me anyway. :)
(ex. having a fridge full of raw meat whenever you are the slightest bit hungry didnt work for me, but when i worked for it - amazing!! :) )
Title: Re: 'Cooked Meat Paleo' to 'Raw Meat Paleo'
Post by: TylerDurden on August 31, 2009, 05:02:05 pm
Re freezing meats:- It's not too common as Aajonus recommends against freezing and the vast majority of RPDers don't give a damn about the parasite issue. That said, some of us have noticed that raw animal fats are less affected by freezing than lean meats so I, for example, store suet and marrow in the freezer, while storing the usual muscle-meatsand other organs in the fridge. That is just for convenience and space. Hardly any RPDers freeze in order to kill parasites as it's too much of a hassle to wait 14 days, and by the time they've done the raw diet for any reasonable length of time, they start realising that the parasite-issues touted by Sally Fallon and co are just nonsense.
Title: Re: 'Cooked Meat Paleo' to 'Raw Meat Paleo'
Post by: Josh on August 31, 2009, 07:20:39 pm
I don't recommend starting with raw mince...I found it really hard to take. It sat in my stomach and caused nausea.
I'm starting to be able to eat a bit now, after eating other things for a while.
How about a bit of steak?
Title: Re: 'Cooked Meat Paleo' to 'Raw Meat Paleo'
Post by: TylerDurden on August 31, 2009, 07:31:24 pm
I don't recommend starting with raw mince...I found it really hard to take. It sat in my stomach and caused nausea.
I'm starting to be able to eat a bit now, after eating other things for a while.
How about a bit of steak?
The problem with minced/ground steak is that it's easily oxidised once exposed to air. Cooking does harm via lipid oxidation so I can't imagine that ground meat is ideal.
I agree re ground meat being more difficult to digest. When I first started rawpalaeo, i found, annoyingly, that I found the taste of ground meat to be less worse, but that it digested less well than raw non-ground meats or raw seafood.
Title: Re: 'Cooked Meat Paleo' to 'Raw Meat Paleo'
Post by: miles on August 31, 2009, 09:48:18 pm
I don't recommend starting with raw mince...I found it really hard to take. It sat in my stomach and caused nausea.
I'm starting to be able to eat a bit now, after eating other things for a while.
How about a bit of steak?
I went and got some 'Beef Braising Steak' and some 'New Zealand Lamb's Liver'.
Title: Re: 'Cooked Meat Paleo' to 'Raw Meat Paleo'
Post by: William on September 01, 2009, 12:19:41 am
I don't see how oxidation could be the problem, as jerky must be the most oxidised for of meat, and almost nobody has a problem with it. I supect its that butchers do when they grind/mince beef. Additives?
Title: Re: 'Cooked Meat Paleo' to 'Raw Meat Paleo'
Post by: Josh on September 01, 2009, 12:36:59 am
I'd say the indigestibility is all the gristle and random parts. Oxidation is more a long term issue eg faster aging, no?
Title: Re: 'Cooked Meat Paleo' to 'Raw Meat Paleo'
Post by: miles on September 01, 2009, 01:02:42 am
I just spent about 1hr eating ~0.1kg(~0.22lb?) of raw 'Beef Braising Steak', I would usually eat ~0.5kg cooked meat in a 'sitting'. It made my throat and fingers quite 'dry', something to do with the acid of the meat affecting the oils of the throat and skin?
I have never eaten something so bland and tasteless, I don't understand it. Probably the second most bland thing I've eaten to that has been lentils(I don't eat them now ofc).
Why does it taste so bland? Furthermore, how can it ever become tasteful? I would expect raw meat to taste powerful... What's going on? If it was good I would expect it to taste strong... even if at first it would be hard to handle? I would expect organs to taste stronger, because they were considered 'delicacies' and eaten raw by tat the 'kill-site', before bringing the carcass back to the camp; but I wouldn't expect the muscle-meat to be so bland...
Title: Re: 'Cooked Meat Paleo' to 'Raw Meat Paleo'
Post by: Josh on September 01, 2009, 01:35:06 am
I reckon we're addicted to strong flavours from an early age..you learn to associate good taste with anything with loads of calories. A Paleo human wouldn't have been exposed to all that.
Title: Re: 'Cooked Meat Paleo' to 'Raw Meat Paleo'
Post by: miles on September 01, 2009, 01:39:04 am
If it was just of weak taste, why would I struggle to eat it? Why would it have more calories cooked also? Is it because when it's cooked and it's broken down, the calories can be more detected in the mouth, but raw they're more preserved to be digested and absorbed in the gut?
In time will I feel like eating more raw meat?
Title: Re: 'Cooked Meat Paleo' to 'Raw Meat Paleo'
Post by: Josh on September 01, 2009, 01:54:21 am
All I mean is you're used to associating certain foods with calories, and also used to a certain set of 'normal' foods.
Yeh, I have got a lot more used to raw meat but it might never taste as good as childhood comfort food for example.
Title: Re: 'Cooked Meat Paleo' to 'Raw Meat Paleo'
Post by: miles on September 01, 2009, 01:58:07 am
Do you feel like eating lots of raw meat in one go? I was taking the tiniest nibbles off of it and got through very little of it; I don't feel like eating more of the raw meat, and my stomach is not asking for more food.. but I do feel like I need more energy and protein. My gums are sore from too much fruit already though.. so that is no option for energy. =/
Title: Re: 'Cooked Meat Paleo' to 'Raw Meat Paleo'
Post by: Josh on September 01, 2009, 02:04:31 am
Maybe back off the fruit and try and eat meat and fat when you're hungry..fruit is a bit all or nothing for me. If I eat it first I just want to eat nothing else.
Title: Re: 'Cooked Meat Paleo' to 'Raw Meat Paleo'
Post by: miles on September 01, 2009, 02:29:50 am
Just on a side note about fat: Way back when I was eating cooked meat(like a few days ago) I bought some 'Beef Dripping'. I notice some people here will get 'suet' and eat it, which is just fat? But is it called dripping because it was cooked out of the meat, so that it dripped out? If so it would not be wise to eat it as I'm trying this raw stuff out.
_______________________________________
Tried some 'New Zealand Lamb's Liver', put it in the oven at 40(deg)C for about 15mins to get it to like room temp. I only managed 2 pieces and felt I would be sick after that... What change actually occurs that makes it taste ok? Is it just the body's desparation for food that makes it give up waiting for what it wants(cooked)? Or is it some sort of adaptation?
Title: Re: 'Cooked Meat Paleo' to 'Raw Meat Paleo'
Post by: miles on September 01, 2009, 05:10:59 am
Unless someone is able to answer my question about what makes raw meat gradually taste better, I'm planning on trying oven cooking (rather than microwaving, which I did previously before trying raw), to see what difference that makes... Although, it could be taking steps backward to some degree...
Title: Re: 'Cooked Meat Paleo' to 'Raw Meat Paleo'
Post by: yon yonson on September 01, 2009, 05:41:22 am
miles, you gotta be a bit more patient. i promise, it will start tasting good after a while. now cooked stuff tastes really strange to me. not bad but i definitely don't get excited to eat it. obviously your tastes buds just havent gotten used to raw meat yet. now you can oven cook stuff if you want but you didn't really give raw any sort of a chance. one day raw and you're deciding to quit? my suggestion is give it time. good luck
Title: Re: 'Cooked Meat Paleo' to 'Raw Meat Paleo'
Post by: miles on September 01, 2009, 05:45:51 am
miles, you gotta be a bit more patient. i promise, it will start tasting good after a while. now cooked stuff tastes really strange to me. not bad but i definitely don't get excited to eat it. obviously your tastes buds just havent gotten used to raw meat yet. now you can oven cook stuff if you want but you didn't really give raw any sort of a chance. one day raw and you're deciding to quit? my suggestion is give it time. good luck
People keep saying that my taste buds will adapt.. but what IS this adaptation? What physical transformation actually occurs..? does the body just become so desperate for protein that it stops holding out for cooked meat and just makes any source of protein start to taste good(which just happens to be raw meat). OR does the body actually go through some adaptation which allows it to handle raw meat better? Because if it tastes foul now, and there is no actual physical adaptation aside from desperation, then I.. -_-
I am worried to give it too much of a chance, people talk about it taking months, and I will rapidly lose weight if I can't eat more than I am now. I haven't felt strong enough to do any exercise today, with the tiny amount of meat which I've been able to consume raw.
Title: Re: 'Cooked Meat Paleo' to 'Raw Meat Paleo'
Post by: goodsamaritan on September 01, 2009, 06:08:13 am
t 40(deg)C for about 15mins to get it to like room temp. I only managed 2 pieces and felt I would be sick after that... What change actually occurs that makes it taste ok? Is it just the body's desparation for food that makes it give up waiting for what it wants(cooked)? Or is it some sort of adaptation?
Liver is different. A liver will make you feel sick regardless of whether it is cooked or raw if the animal is unhealthy or most probably not organic. The reflex action you just experienced with your taste buts and stomach is telling you the liver you got is probably toxic. That has happened to me with chicken livers.
Animal liver health is different from one animal to the next.
I have the luxury of going to the wet market and be able to choose from several fresh beef livers unfrozen and be able to taste it on the spot. Since I can compare, I can see which livers are healthy. The butchers know themselves.
Healthy raw beef liver always tastes really good even for people who are not used to raw foods... they are surprised to taste healthy raw beef liver and learn that it tastes good... they wonder why they are cooking liver. My kids in fact will only eat raw beef liver and not cooked beef liver because cooked beef liver tastes awful... they did not need to adapt to liver.
Try my "raw" liver recipe for kids http://www.rawpaleoforum.com/omnivorous-raw-paleo/recipe-to-make-delicious-raw-beef-liver-children-will-love/
Your best bet with liver or any meat is to order from the same source as the people in your country so that you are tasting the same thing they say tastes great.
With beef I had to try several wet markets and taste which ones tasted good... it will be natural to gravitate to one that tastes great... the obvious grass fed yellow fat beef.
My transition to eating raw meat came with steaks. I seared for 30 seconds per side. Then down to 20, 10, 5 seconds then none. I did it with my kids. The kids testified that anything longer than 10 seconds makes the steak tough.
Of course condiment free. Try cooked meat paleo with zero condiments first. Then less and less heat.
Here's Geoff's tips that helped me immensely http://www.rawpaleoforum.com/important-info-for-newbies/sticky-advice-for-newbies-wishing-to-slowly-ease-into-a-raw-animal-food-diet/
Title: Re: 'Cooked Meat Paleo' to 'Raw Meat Paleo'
Post by: miles on September 01, 2009, 06:10:51 am
I don't know how I would be able to tell if liver is good or not... I don't have the money to afford special stuff. =/
What is the adaptation to normal muscle meat then?? Since I never ate liver before anyway..
Title: Re: 'Cooked Meat Paleo' to 'Raw Meat Paleo'
Post by: goodsamaritan on September 01, 2009, 06:15:04 am
Try refreshing your browser. I did an edit above. -----------
Organic beef has superior taste over grain fed. The taste is so obvious. A few days ago I was with a customer in a swanky restaurant and was forced to order seared bloody bloody bloody steak (told the waiter special orders for the cook) The swanky restaurant beef was not organic, or the variety did not taste good, I'm spoiled by my beef source. The butchers know what I like, first class organic batangas beef.
You save a lot of money with raw meat because you eat less raw meat than if you cook it.
Title: Re: 'Cooked Meat Paleo' to 'Raw Meat Paleo'
Post by: miles on September 01, 2009, 08:27:17 am
I am wondering if the reason why humans cook food is because they are omnivores. Maybe cooking does allow more macronutrient absorption, but perhaps the corruption of these macronutrients, and the loss of micronutrients means that you need to supplement strongly with fruit/veg to counter these issues. If humans couldn't eat veg/fruit then they would need to eat the meat raw to get their micronutrients. So maybe raw meat will only taste good if you do stop eating fruit/veg?
Or maybe the heat initially accelerates absorption and makes one feel like they need more, but when the food cools down, the process does too and one's left with more food than they need...
Although, like the Good Samaritan said, I think it would be good for me to try some of the raw meat that people in the UK say is good. So if anyone has suggestions, I could make a small order first to find out...
Actually though, I just oven-cooked(High temp - 250(deg)C) some beef-mince as opposed to microwaving it, and I've not given it long but I might be seeing why some people had digestion problems with cooked meat... as it's making my stomach kind of uncomfortable now.. but I'd need longer to make a judgement. The fact that it was mince though, would expose more surface area to the carcinogenic effects of cooking.
I may not be experiencing quite the same downer I usually do after microwave meat, I'm not sure yet, but the feeling of fullness is something I wouldn't experience with the microwaving.. It's the feeling of fullness similar to that one gets when eating grains with this oven-cooked meat. After microwave meat, I feel like I COULD run around and jump if I wanted to and wouldn't feel sick.. but that I don't actually have any energy to do so and would send myself in to some deficit and would rather just sit around. However, now I feel like I couldn't run around, but if I did I would have the energy to do so. o_O It's very soon to make judgements ofc, but I am wondering if raw meat would have the best of both.. None of the digestive upset of the oven-cooked, and none of the fatigue of the microwave cooked. =/
Come to think of it... the other method of cooking meat which gave me huge downtimes was frying ZOMG... Frying and Microwaving both have something in common; they both target fats with the most intense heat... So the damaged fat is what gives the downtimes perhaps? hm... then the slightly 'bloated' feeling if that's the right term. It'll be something to do with the burning of the meat. Although it's not black, it's a hell of a lot darker than red, which is how it started out... However I'd need time to see that the burnt aspect wasn't actually acting like fibre and speeding the food's journey thus making me feel like I have more energy. o_O With apologies for the rudeness.. in the name of science I must add that this consumption WAS followed by faecal excretion; which follows the 'burnt meat is like fibre' path. I hate to think of the damage I would cause to be digestive tract if I were to consume such intensely cooked meat in the long term; I expect it would be somewhat similar to the effect of grains, judging by the short-term effects.
I may see what happens with gradually decreasing the oven temperature and keeping the same duration... Judging by what some people have said, it seems as though it could be risky to eat heavily cooked meat and raw meat in conjunction, however, gradually easing towards raw should be OK. This time though, I plan to stop at the lowest temperature which I can comfortably eat, and not push myself(unless I actually decide that I am actually happy with my newly discovered, intensely oven-cooked meat). That is, until I can get hold of some HQ Pasture-fed meat for a fair raw-trial.
Goodnight Fellows. I shall continue to update on my situation tomorrow...
Title: Re: 'Cooked Meat Paleo' to 'Raw Meat Paleo'
Post by: TylerDurden on September 01, 2009, 05:01:40 pm
There are 2 paths if you don't want to go cold turkey. Either you gradually reduce the cooking temperature every so often until you're eventually used to raw meat at room-temperature and/or you can go in for blending raw foods in food-mixers/blenders with various processed sauces, then switching to raw sauces over time.
Title: Re: 'Cooked Meat Paleo' to 'Raw Meat Paleo'
Post by: miles on September 01, 2009, 08:19:22 pm
I already went straight to raw for a day, but none of it tasted good; I thought it was because it was poor quality meat?
Title: Re: 'Cooked Meat Paleo' to 'Raw Meat Paleo'
Post by: goodsamaritan on September 01, 2009, 09:10:20 pm
Poor quality meat tastes bad, even today that I'm adapted to raw. In fact, now that I'm used to raw, my taste buds are more sensitive.
Plus when you eat raw meat, you must be very hungry.
I think there is also the brain wiring / mental block, the zero condiments, the socializing aspect, the temperature of the meat (has to be room temperature, not straight from the ref). Also the chewing is different. Raw meat is more like chew less then swallow. Especially raw fats.
Maybe my kids will make you smile. If they think raw beef is delicious, it must be delicious:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JwTZAw5aSjU
Title: Re: 'Cooked Meat Paleo' to 'Raw Meat Paleo'
Post by: miles on September 02, 2009, 02:08:43 am
The kids did make me smile =)
I had oven meat today and it was no better than microwaved energy wise... Initially I started off by living off of Corned beef, Tinned Pork, Tinned Sardines, tinned tuna, tinned salmon etc.. I remember now and again I would have some fried mince or something and it would make me feel really out of energy(like all cooked meat still does, but I assumed it must be better; it had less salt and that allowed me to eat more of it...). I got to a point where I decided that I was having far too much salt(what I was consuming had loads of it), so I started cooking my meat myself(also thought it could reduce cost and seemed to allow me to eat more of it too). While I was getting my meat from tins, I would get to a point where I felt low on energy; then I would eat the tinned meat and feel energised... I would purposefully have a tin before I went to do some exercise so I would be able to keep going. I genuinely don't know what it is... When I eat cooked chicken breast which has virtually no fat in, that makes me feel tired too.
One thing that certainly doesn't make me feel tired, but energises me is salami(which is expensive and high in salt). Again though, that's cold o_O
It doesn't seem that anyone's experienced the same.. I feel that this could be because of the rancid-fat clogging my arteries and would thus take time to change, but.. hmm.. =/
Title: Re: 'Cooked Meat Paleo' to 'Raw Meat Paleo'
Post by: miles on September 02, 2009, 02:42:31 am
I have been thinking that I need to sort my diet out before I return to my sport(which I was off to sort an injury) but it's possible, I suppose, that due to reduced exercise(apart from weights), that my capacity for ketosis has actually reduced. Maybe my diet isn't so bad after all and I've just got bad at using the fat. I am aware that after exercise [relating to another topic I've posted], that I actually smell less of ketones. Maybe sitting more, the fat is going rancid and clogging up my blood-stream and making me feel tired, but I'm eating just as much of it as I would before, because I'm so used to 2hr/day 7 day/week sports training(in addition to extra-exercise). Without my sport training, I've still tried to apply as much focus to my sport as I can so I've looked at my diet in detail for example(my sport is what matters to me so I can't bare to waste time even in injury). So perhaps I've been over-working problems which aren't really bad. I actually consciously tried to continue eating lots aswell, so that I would have plenty of energy to spend on recovery. It seems this could very well be my issue after all; and maybe I've been suffering hyper-chondriac like issues =) However, I've still learned a lot in the process if that is the case. I have still made certain improvements for SURE, much of which I can apply to good effect. I am actually returning to sport tomorrow. hm... =S
It's incredible, with something like diet, that the answers are not available. When we've been to the moon, fly super-fast aeroplanes, can contact people on the other side of the world and reach deep into the ocean, how poor the understanding of our own diet is. To find things out it takes pioneers though, like the people on this website. GL... I continue on my own quest for ultimate diet...
Title: Re: 'Cooked Meat Paleo' to 'Raw Meat Paleo'
Post by: TylerDurden on September 02, 2009, 03:03:37 am
I already went straight to raw for a day, but none of it tasted good; I thought it was because it was poor quality meat?
MOST raw meat tastes bad to a cooked-dieter. It takes c.8-12 months for the taste-change to occur if you go cold-turkey.(longer if you keep on eating lots of cooked foods with the raw). The reason is simply that most people are used to cooked foods which actually have less taste than raw foods, so require lots of extra spices to enhance the taste. So, it takes time to get used to the richer taste of raw animal food. Of course, some raw foods are usually easier for people to get used to(like raw seafood) and , generally speaking, then richer the taste(such as raw organ-meats), the longer it will take for you to become accustomed to the taste of it.
Title: Re: 'Cooked Meat Paleo' to 'Raw Meat Paleo'
Post by: miles on September 02, 2009, 03:16:11 am
I don't add anything to my cooked meats.. no flavourings or spices. Maybe the steak I had just tasted bland because I was taking such small bites?
Title: Re: 'Cooked Meat Paleo' to 'Raw Meat Paleo'
Post by: PaleoPhil on September 02, 2009, 10:34:40 am
Raw venison sausage tasted OK to me the first time I tried it, even though I was still eating cooked meats. The second time I tried it I thought it was pretty good (though the farmer added too much sage). The third time I thought it was quite good. Then I found raw ground venison and loved it the first time I tried it. I buy whatever my local store carries and gobble it up quickly. I wish they carried more. It costs a bit more than pasture-fed beef, though.
The following are not RPD-approved foods, but I love beef jerky, suet and pemmican heated below 40 degrees celsius and it only took me a couple months to love jerky, 4 tries to love pemmican and about 6 or 7 tries to love melted suet. Maybe I was lucky. I still don't love raw grassfed ground beef though. I sometimes have to cheat a little to get it down--lightly cooking what's left when I can't eat any more, then I can eat that (which suggests to me that it's easier to eat more cooked food than raw, which may explain why many people, myself included, report losing weight on an all-raw diet--which most people see as a good thing, of course). By doing a bit more of the low-heat meats and fats I was able to get my weight moving back up again, and I'm more slowly weaning off of the heated stuff so I don't lose too much weight too quickly, like Lex did.
Title: Re: 'Cooked Meat Paleo' to 'Raw Meat Paleo'
Post by: invisible on September 02, 2009, 12:23:15 pm