Omnivorous Raw Paleo Diet / Re: description
« on: November 06, 2008, 06:34:03 am »These simply "distilled opinion" of what I think is garbage about chemicalizing food. Saying fruit = sugar or fruit = fructose. Which in my opinion is baloney and wrong. Just as we cannot just lump protein = beef = wild salmon = wild tuna = farmed fish or FAT = canola oil = butter = beef brains = marrow = extra virgin olive oil
This is why we humans crave for variety. All these foods are different. All these foods give different results. All these foods have different nutrition.
Fruit is a paleolithic heritage. In tropical and forested areas, people had to snack on fruit for hydration and food in between kills of meat.
Paleolithic times does not mean exclusively ice age times... where people were forced to be carnivorous... the ice ages came in and out.
Weston Price studied different isolated healthy tribes and eskimos were just one of them.
In times of healing... not so sweet fruits are used as fasting tools.
What i'm saying is that this diagram about fructose may be true for PURE fructose as a chemical but certainly DOES NOT apply to all the fruits of today and up to 5 million years ago.
This post does not mean to suggest to go either high carb or low carb... it merely suggests that fruits are a paleolithic food and the amount of fruits people ate would have depended on where they were and what kind of fruits were available and at what season.