I don't see anything in the general theory of evolution which doesn't make sense...

Phil, don't you feel like most of your weight is on your heel, even leaning forward as much as you can...? I could hold it for a long time.. I mean hours(though I haven't tried. I'm finding it a lot easier today than last night), but it doesn't feel particularly restful. I don't know, but I like the idea of squatting places instead of sitting anyway =) I've 'always' done (exercise)squats this way, flat feet, all the way down; just not holding the bottom part for more than 10secs ever.

It does seem like it may be bad putting your butt on the ground out of the wild.

I hope he eats those animals.

Except that mine was in shoulder of lamb. OK, It's getting really annoying this suet thing... Suet is the stuff around the kidneys, OK I've got that. But people were referring to the stuff around the heart as suet too. I have started describing the particular muscle-fat which is similar to suet as 'suety'. It was just that the fat was similar to suet, but it was muscle-fat, and it had this sack in it. I guess it was kind of similar to that description of the glands though, odd... Could still be anything though. Since there seemed to be something inside some of the muscle tissue as well though, I'm kind of worried that there was just something wrong with this lamb.

If you look around you, and believe the evidence of your own eyes, you shall see that our ancestors evolved to eat Big Macs (TM), poutine and beer.
This is one more reason why I don't believe that evolution story.

That does not make sense, William...

(First I posted about this, shocked that you could think someone's hair falling out is a positive thing, then deleted it),Hmm.. With the hair falling out... We can grow it back, other animals can grow their limbs back. Do animals, which have this ability, discard their limbs in a similar way? That'd have to be something pretty serious I guess... But the hair thing seems to make a lot of sense.. I've heard before of them using the hair to tell if people had excessive quantities of certain chemicals. And it's not much of a loss...

My question was just whether a human's gut would have a similar capability as the lion's, and if this would be increased by eating only/mainly raw meat.

I thought that pigs got worms because they dig up the ground with their snout, roll around in mud and it goes in their mouths etc...

That is a wonderful theory. I don't really have any response just yet. I will have to think about that one, and I'll start by sleeping on it.

I don't know what it was... But in the lamb I was eating today(raw) There were large cysts in the muscle and the fat(one in each). Within the suety muscle fat, there was a sack of soft whitish/light greyish mush; had some more solid things in amongst it... There was something similar in the muscle tissue as well, jelly-like mush, don't remember what colour.

..............................................There are lots of small mutations.................. If there is no pressure alleviated by a mutation(i.e. people are not more likely to survive and reproduce), there's no reason why it should progress in to more distinctive traits....

When you say that white meats and fish give the heaviest detox, these would be the meats likely to contain the most bacteria/parasites.

You use the word 'designed' a lot... How could parasites and bacteria be designed to clean people up? Do you mean that: If someone's cells are weak, because they contain, or were built in the presence of toxins they are vulnerable to the (minor)parasites/bacteria. If this person stops ingesting toxins, their new cells they build will be healthy, and the parasites/bacteria will speed up the removal of the older,weaker more vulnerable cells? Similar to how maggots consume damaged flesh, as this is weak and vulnerable to them, but so happens to be beneficial to the person as it clears the way for new, healthy tissue.

The tapeworm would not be affected by this, since it feeds directly off of your food?

"Why would the parasites kill their host?"

"Why would humans destroy their environments?"

It's not a case of them being stupid. If their host starts to reject them, or their host isn't giving them what they need, they they might turn on the host in an effort to survive. Also, another parasite might not expect a long life, and be more 'interested' in passing its' eggs on to another host, than living with its' present host... If something exists, it exists. It will continue to exist, so long as it exists. It doesn't have to fit in perfectly with its' neighbours to exist, it just has to exist to exist...

wtf... It's you who is confused, Roony...