IMO eating other animal's healthy organs that corresponds to your own defective organs is just a shortcut to getting the appropriate nutrients (then again, I'd ask for something solid backing up this belief), but you probably can get as good results with other foods that contains these same necessary nutrients.

Say you want to heal your teeth. I doubt eating other animal's healthy teeth is the best and only way to do it. There's probably more digests food out there that can give you the same necessary building blocks.

Bulls get their sexual energy and strength from a series of very complex biological phenomenon, in which they are able to cultivate large amounts of nutrient rich bacteria in their guts to feed off of. The nutrients contained in the microscopic organelles of trillions of microbes is what gives the bull its vitality.

All right, then where do plants get their sexual energy from? Minerals don't have sexual organs, neither does the sun's rays, which are very basically the only things a plant consumes.

What JK wrote is absolutely logical and I can't see anything wrong or arrogant in his post . Can't you understand the very basic logic of his argument?

Yeah for a moment I forgot I was talking to CK, so a burst of anger from his behalf wasn't something I should not have expected.

There's plenty of good science behind it. And common sense.

Really not.

My family doctor once told me plant-based protein powder* would give me the sexual strength of a plant. So I thought, "Wait a minute: then where do bulls get their sexual strength from exactly?!"

Their was a thread on this forum about eating adult male animals to boost testosterone or something. The thing is, virile adult males are rarely the ones who get killed in a hunt. It's a lot more often the little ones, the sick, the injured, females, or elders. Makes you wonder how predators keep high testosterone levels, if they rarely get to eat testosterone-rich preys.

I think it's a lot more belief or superstition than it is reality.



* It was an experiment, okay? I was young and care free back then...

Alright, so I watched the full pyramid movie. I've got to admit, it's pretty interesting. Worth the watch.

(SPOILER ALERT)
I like the conclusion about the whole great pyramid area being some sort of astronomical clock. If it's legit, it's quite amazing.

One critic I'll omit is they seem to forget Egyptians used more tools than just pikes and granite balls, as presented in the debunking video (which doesn't have anything to do with the movie's theory, agreed).

Also it kinda has a little to do with aliens, as they take care to show that skull with a big ass head, and a statue of some pharaoh which I forgot the name, discreetly indicating that people who built or thought the pyramids were not totally like us regular humans...

The movie proves that people who made the pyramids had great knowledge, at least in mathematics and physics. Greater than previously thought by some archaeologists, by the looks of it.

I won't get into the proposition these people make about pyramids and other ancient monuments being a way to warn future civilizations about possible regulated cataclysm. It's up to the viewer to decide.

Seems like it's actually not the most expensive course, as I've checked others and they all cost around 400-450€.

Unfortunately it is fully booked.

I remember seeing the calendar of some organization with courses in June. Will investigate.

Tyler already posted it:

http://ancientaliensdebunked.com/references-and-transcripts/the-pyramids/

There's also some stuff about Annunaki on the same website, if you're interested in challenging your beliefs a bit.

Face it Tyler, you didn't watch the movie, (nor do you ever watch any of the links) nor did Iguana and nor did JeuneKoq. The three of you were showing that you don't want to be confused with information when your minds are already cemented in place.

Nice attitude Raw-al... After all I've done for your daughter's Spirulina well-being... I simply said that I didn't want this stuff to appear on the "non-members included" front-page, for obvious, legitimate reasons. I never said that this could not be discussed. I mean, Tyler and we discussed (more like argue) about Ufos and aliens, so I'm in no place to complain here.

 I may currently disagree with the idea that this stuff is real, but I was actually considering taking the time to watch that video (time I would not usually spend on examining other far-fetched paranoia-driven ideas* such as lizard-illuminati etc...) and form my own opinion. Maybe search for info debunking it at the same time...Gotta take it from different angles, that's the right way to do it.


*relax, not necessarily saying this theory fits the picture...yet.

Really? I thought Off-topic was precisely designed for all the off-topic, strange, paranormal subjects, and Hot-topic for stuff such as accounts of people surviving out there on raw foods only, various events that may concern the whole raw community, and such.

Oh well, your call moderators. I'm already used to this stuff, but more pragmatic newcomers might be put off by it, especially if it's the first thing they read here...

Regarding the previous ban comment... we literally just launched last month lol.

Right, my bad. It was an advertisement for another company called "Monthly Paleo snack box".

Monthly Paleo: Healthy Snack Box To Help You Stay Fit

Saber, maybe algaes -or at least the variety you tried- are just not appropriate to you at the moment, but I doubt that they are only good for people on a conventional diet, or that they are "nutrient poor". After all, they are as accessible a paleo food as any other seafood.

Sea spaghetti, for example, can be harvested anywhere between the Scandinavian coast and Portugal. The young ones still attached to a support (rocks, wrecks...) are best to eat, and the tip is usually the only part collected.

You might have to check first if fresh water algae can be grown in the same environment as salt water algae. I personally doubt it.

I suggest quitting eating altogether then, since traces of Monsanto round-up pesticide's main substance, the glyphosate, has been found even in the backbones of animals living in the Arctic.

Also toxins are not only stored in the liver. They can be stored in fat tissues, and maybe elsewhere if the intoxication is greater. So no suet either.

Your concern is understandable, but the point is you'll never find perfectly pure food in this world, so might as well eat what does you more good than harm. If your body craves liver, I suggest eating some, from the best source available to you.

I think some foods can be replaced by others with a similar nutritive content, so if you really have a problem with liver and kidneys, you could try and find that alternative.

...says the atheist 




(POLITICAL atheist, I know...)

Wild animal epidemics have been around as long as wild animals.  That's established science.
Humans may in some ways contribute to them, but overpopulation followed by epidemic disease is a natural cycle.

Let's just says humans have helped wild animal epidemics happen more frequently, with livestock-farming and the removal of natural predators.

It isn't only the Inuits  who eat raw animal foods, the Nenets do so a lot as do the Masai as regards raw milk, the australian aborigines used to eat raw , live witchetty grubs  a lot etc. etc. . Plus, many such tribes would go in for aging their raw meats which does to some extent counter the negative effects of eating cooked foods at the same time.

Well all modern societies eat salads and raw vegetables, and have their own raw meat delicacies such as sushis, steak tartar, raw ham, herring, cheese...Most used to eat aged (but cooked) meat too.

Eating cooked-only is impossible, as you may die from a disease (which I forgot the name), so it's quite logical that each cultures and societies keep some variety of raw food to prevent this.

If Paleo man had the chance, he'd deep-fry everything!