Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - TylerDurden

Pages: 1 ... 84 85 86 87 88 [89] 90 91 92 93 94 ... 96
2201
Off Topic / Over 400 members!
« on: August 13, 2009, 04:37:27 pm »
I see now that we have over 400 "official" members, and this after only c.15 months since this forum got started. Which is pretty good for a forum devoted to such an unusual subject-matter as raw(palaeo) foods. Over the next decade or so, I think it would be great if some of us did a bit of "outreach" re the media. A couple of us have already done interviews, and I'm sure it would help if people cited our forum as a source or linked to us etc. from time to time.



2202
I've just finished doing a review of Stefansson's book not by bread alone (for update to rawpaleodietcom soonest). In the process, I noticed Stefansson making a claim that something in meats (provided they are not cooked more than between medium and well-done) prevents scurvy, whether vitamin C or something else.. My question is, has anyone ever followed a cooked zero carb diet(either here or on zerocarbage forum or elsewhere) where they only ever ate well-cooked meat for months or years, without getting scurvy? Obviously, it would be difficult to properly verify any such claims but still I'd like to know.

2203
Carnivorous / Zero Carb Approach / Water in a raw ZC diet
« on: August 02, 2009, 05:54:03 am »
One thing that has been said about the Inuit diet is that they drink a huge amount of water and it is explained that they have to excrete so much urea(derived from all the animal protein they eat) that they need this water to facilitate this process. Therefore, I'm curious to know if ZCers routinely drink large amounts of water.

2204
Suggestion Box / Topics in the right forums
« on: July 15, 2009, 04:07:19 pm »
Could people PLEASE put their topics in the right forums. I've had to just now move some zero-carb-oriented posts to the zero carb forum, a dairy topic to the hot topics forum etc. It's awkward and better to have other forums competing with the general discussions forum so as to promote more variety. I can understand why raw omnivore questions are always  put in the general discussions forum rather than in the raw omnivore forum(though I'm not all that comfortable with the idea) but as many topics as possible should be diverted to other forums if applicable(ie a topic mainly concerning Aajonus and his diet should go to the primal diet forum, a weston-price topic should go to the weston-price forum etc.)

2205
General Discussion / Man The Hunted
« on: July 08, 2009, 05:03:48 pm »
Here's the link:-

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/02/050212190551.htm

Man The Hunter' Theory Is Debunked In New Book

In a new book, an anthropologist at Washington University in St. Louis goes against the prevailing view and argues that primates, including early humans, evolved not as hunters but as prey of many predators, including wild dogs and cats, hyenas, eagles and crocodiles.

Despite popular theories posed in research papers and popular literature, early man was not an aggressive killer, argues Robert W. Sussman, Ph.D., professor of anthropology in Arts & Sciences.

Sussman's book, "Man the Hunted: Primates, Predators and Human Evolution," poses a new theory, based on the fossil record and living primate species, that primates have been prey for millions of years, a fact that greatly influenced the evolution of early man.

He co-authored the book with Donna L. Hart, Ph.D., a member of the faculty of Pierre Laclede Honors College and the Department of Anthropology at the University of Missouri-St. Louis. The book is scheduled to be released in late February.

Our intelligence, cooperation and many other features we have as modern humans developed from our attempts to out-smart the predator, says Sussman.

Since the 1924 discovery of the first early humans, australopithicenes, which lived from seven million years ago to two million years ago, many scientists theorized that those early human ancestors were hunters and possessed a killer instinct.

Through his research and writing, Sussman has worked for years to debunk that theory. An expert in the ecology and social structure of primates, Sussman does extensive fieldwork in primate behavior and ecology in Costa Rica, Guyana, Madagascar and Mauritius. He is the author and editor of several books, including "The Origins and Nature of Sociality," "Primate Ecology and Social Structure," and "The Biological Basis of Human Behavior: A Critical Review."

The idea of "Man the Hunter" is the generally accepted paradigm of human evolution, says Sussman, who recently served as editor of American Anthropologist. "It developed from a basic Judeo-Christian ideology of man being inherently evil, aggressive and a natural killer. In fact, when you really examine the fossil and living non-human primate evidence, that is just not the case."

Studying the fossil evidence

And examine the evidence they did. Sussman and Hart's research is based on studying the fossil evidence dating back nearly seven million years. "Most theories on Man the Hunter fail to incorporate this key fossil evidence," Sussman says. "We wanted evidence, not just theory. We thoroughly examined literature available on the skulls, bones, footprints and on environmental evidence, both of our hominid ancestors and the predators that coexisted with them."

Since the process of human evolution is so long and varied, Sussman and Hart decided to focus their research on one specific species, Australopithecus afarensis, which lived between five million and two and a half million years ago and is one of the better known early human species. Most paleontologists agree that Australopithecus afarensis is the common link between fossils that came before and those that came after. It shares dental, cranial and skeletal traits with both. It's also a very well-represented species in the fossil record.

"Australopithecus afarensis was probably quite strong, like a small ape," Sussman says. Adults ranged from around 3 to 5 feet and they weighed 60-100 pounds. They were basically smallish bipedal primates. Their teeth were relatively small, very much like modern humans, and they were fruit and nut eaters.

But what Sussman and Hart discovered is that Australopithecus afarensis was not dentally pre-adapted to eat meat. "It didn't have the sharp shearing blades necessary to retain and cut such foods," Sussman says. "These early humans simply couldn't eat meat. If they couldn't eat meat, why would they hunt?"

It was not possible for early humans to consume a large amount of meat until fire was controlled and cooking was possible. Sussman points out that the first tools didn't appear until two million years ago. And there wasn't good evidence of fire until after 800,000 years ago. "In fact, some archaeologists and paleontologists don't think we had a modern, systematic method of hunting until as recently as 60,000 years ago," he says.

"Furthermore, Australopithecus afarensis was an edge species," adds Sussman. They could live in the trees and on the ground and could take advantage of both. "Primates that are edge species, even today, are basically prey species, not predators," Sussman argues.

The predators living at the same time as Australopithecus afarensis were huge and there were 10 times as many as today. There were hyenas as big as bears, as well as saber-toothed cats and many other mega-sized carnivores, reptiles and raptors. Australopithecus afarensis didn't have tools, didn't have big teeth and was three feet tall. He was using his brain, his agility and his social skills to get away from these predators. "He wasn't hunting them," says Sussman. "He was avoiding them at all costs."

Approximately 6 percent to 10 percent of early humans were preyed upon according to evidence that includes teeth marks on bones, talon marks on skulls and holes in a fossil cranium into which sabertooth cat fangs fit, says Sussman. The predation rate on savannah antelope and certain ground-living monkeys today is around 6 percent to 10 percent as well.

Sussman and Hart provide evidence that many of our modern human traits, including those of cooperation and socialization, developed as a result of being a prey species and the early human's ability to out-smart the predators. These traits did not result from trying to hunt for prey or kill our competitors, says Sussman.

"One of the main defenses against predators by animals without physical defenses is living in groups," says Sussman. "In fact, all diurnal primates (those active during the day) live in permanent social groups. Most ecologists agree that predation pressure is one of the major adaptive reasons for this group-living. In this way there are more eyes and ears to locate the predators and more individuals to mob them if attacked or to confuse them by scattering. There are a number of reasons that living in groups is beneficial for animals that otherwise would be very prone to being preyed upon."

2206
Primal Diet / New Aajonus DVD available
« on: July 08, 2009, 03:54:03 pm »
If you're willing to shell out  260 us dollars you can buy the new Aajonus DVD:-


http://www.wewant2live.com/site/811618/product/PDW-DVD

2207
General Discussion / Further article on AGEs
« on: June 30, 2009, 08:37:23 pm »
Just so as to hammer the point home re the fact that the consumption of cooked food leads to increased aging(via ingestion of heat-created toxins such as AGEs), here is an article on the subject giving more info:-

 http://tinyurl.com/lh93vt

http://www.redorbit.com/news/health/1067029/advanced_glycation_and_lipoxidation_end_productsamplifiers_of_inflammation_the_role/index.html

2208

Le Big Mac has conquered La Belle France
Complacency, a weak economy and a taste for fast food are killing the French gastronomic tradition, says Michael Steinberger.
 

By Michael Steinberger
Published: 7:00AM BST 27 Jun 2009
Le Big Mac has conquered La Belle France
Not only are the French cooking less; they are spending less time at the table

La Belle France: charming bistros, glorious wines and cheeses, bountiful markets, streets filled with the smell of freshly baked bread – all emblems of the greatest food culture that the world has known. Sadly, though, that culture is now in eclipse. Twenty-five years ago, it took some effort to dine poorly in France; these days bad meals are depressingly common, and it can be tough to find even a decent baguette in some villages and towns.

Bistros, brasseries, and cafés are folding by the thousands each year. Small farms are disappearing at an equally alarming clip. Dozens of raw-milk cheeses have become extinct in the past quarter-century. Wine consumption in France has declined by an astonishing 50 per cent since the 1960s, and continues to plunge.


   
     

And there is an even more shocking statistic: France is now the second most profitable market in the world for McDonald's. La Belle France has been conquered by Le Big Mac.

What accounts for the decline in France's food tradition? Economic sclerosis is probably the biggest factor. For the better part of the last 30 years, France has suffered anaemic growth, high unemployment and stagnant living standards. This, coupled with a business environment distinctly hostile to business – punitive tax rates and crippling regulations – has wreaked havoc on France's culinary industry.

It is hardly controversial to suggest that there is a link between economic and culinary prosperity. In flush times, restaurants flourish and demand for high-quality foodstuffs soars.

The gastronomic awakening experienced in Spain, Britain and the US came on the back of robust economic growth. By contrast, the French economy sputtered, and French cuisine did likewise.

French cuisine has also suffered on account of changes in the household. In recent decades, millions of French women have joined the workforce. This has been a step forward for gender equality, but it has done French eating habits no good.

In France, discerning palates have always been cultivated around the family dinner table; indeed, almost to a person, all the great French chefs of the last half-century had their interest in cooking nurtured by mothers and grandmothers. But with two-income households increasingly prevalent, the French are cooking less than ever.

Women returning after a long day's work have neither the time nor the inclination to prepare a family meal; it is far easier to throw a frozen pizza in the microwave. Not only are the French cooking less; they are spending less time at the table. A study found that the average meal in France now lasts 38 minutes, down from 88 minutes 25 years ago.

Although the manifesto launching the International Slow Food Movement was signed in Paris in 1989, it wasn't until 2003 that a French chapter of Slow Food was even established, and as of 2008, there were just 1,800 French members, versus 26,000 in Italy and 17,000 in the United States.

The French, it seems, much prefer fast food to Slow Food. McDonald's now has more than 1,000 restaurants in France, serving more than a million customers a day. It is the country's largest private-sector employer. Indeed, McDonald's has been so successful in France that the man who spearheaded its strategy there, Parisian Denis Hennequin, today oversees all of Europe for the fast food chain, and is believed to be in line to head the whole company. A Frenchman in charge of McDonald's – chew on that for a moment.

These developments are doing French waistlines no good. Contrary to the title of the book, French women do get fat, and so do their husbands and children. Obesity rates in France are soaring. In 2005, it was reported that 40 per cent of all French were obese or overweight, a figure that had doubled in less than a decade. The data for children was especially alarming: among under-18s, the obesity rate was rising by more than 20 per cent a year. If these trends persist, France is on course to be as supersized as America by 2020.

While the French stuff themselves on McDonald's, some of the glories of French cuisine are withering away. Fifty years ago, all French cheeses were made from raw milk, or lait cru – the only kind worth eating, according to aficionados. Nowadays raw-milk varieties account for barely 10 per cent of the cheese produced in France.

In 2007, the most iconic of all French cheeses, Camembert, came under threat when Lactalis and Isigny Sainte-Mère, the two companies that turn out the majority of raw-milk Camembert, threatened to quit the appellation unless the rules were amended to permit them to use treated milk. To their credit, the authorities refused and the companies relented, but this was a small victory in a war that is being lost.

France still produces the world's finest wines, but large swathes of its wine industry are in crisis due to the plunge in domestic consumption combined with the emergence of robust competition from abroad.

Thousands of producers, mainly in Bordeaux, Beaujolais, and the Languedoc region, are essentially destitute. It is estimated that a third of the 10,000 winemakers in the Languedoc will be driven out of business in the next few years. A handful of vintners have committed suicide, while others have taken up arms.

An organisation of militant winemakers known as the Comité Régional d'Action Viticole, or CRAV, has been waging a campaign of violence to call attention to their plight – setting off bombs in supermarkets that carry foreign wines, hijacking trucks transporting foreign wines into France, and attacking facilities storing wines. They are, in essence, wine terrorists.

And what of haute cuisine, the ultimate expression of French gastronomic achievement? France still has plenty of great chefs – Alain Ducasse, Joël Robuchon, Pierre Gagnaire, Guy Savoy – but as the New Yorker writer Adam Gopnik put it, the "muse of cooking" seems to have moved on. For the first time in the annals of modern cuisine, the world's most talked-about and influential chefs are not French; instead, that distinction now belongs to Spain's Ferran Adrià, Britain's Heston Blumenthal, and America's Thomas Keller. The French, meanwhile, seem content to rest on past glories.

In recent years, luminaries like Ducasse and Savoy have been pushing to have UNESCO formally declare French cuisine to be part of the world's cultural patrimony, an effort that has a distinctly valedictory ring. It suggests that the French have given up any pretence of intellectual leadership in the kitchen, that French cuisine has, in the words of the International Herald Tribune's Mary Blume, entered "a gelid commemorative phase".

So it is over for French cuisine? Certainly, a lot has been lost, and with the rest of the world eating so much better now (thanks in no small part to the influence of the French), France will never again be the world's undisputed culinary lodestar.

But amid all the gloomy portents, there are hopeful signs, too. In the face of France's persistent economic stagnation and the often deadening weight of its rich gastronomic tradition, a number of very gifted young chefs are serving exciting food at prices that people can afford and in the convivial settings that restaurant-goers now demand. This promising trend has even acquired a nickname – bistronomie.

There are scores of cheesemakers, vintners, and other artisans who remain as devoted to their métiers and as committed to quality as ever. Ultimately, though, the fate of French food rests in the hands of the public. Until now, it has been sadly apathetic in the face of the country's declining standards at the table. Only if that changes can French cuisine hope to have a future as bright as its past.

'Au Revoir to All That' by Michael Steinberger (Bloomsbury) is available from Telegraph Books for £16.99 plus £1.25 postage and packing. Call 0844 871 1515 or go to books.telegraph.co.uk
 

2209
General Discussion / Proof yet again that cooked food causes aging
« on: June 27, 2009, 05:57:05 pm »
I've posted many studies in the past directly linking the consumption of cooked foods(via ingestion of heat-created toxins) to many age-related diseases such as osteoarthritis, cardiovascular disease etc. Now, here's a study directly linking AGE-levels to an increase in general aging:-

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11237208?dopt=Abstract&holding=f1000,f1000m,isrctn


2211
Off Topic / Talking to plants
« on: June 24, 2009, 10:12:06 pm »
I'm always amused by the vegetarian horror of killing animals while not balking at killing plants. Here's an article proving something often claimed by the prince of wales(despite being wrongly ridiculed for it), namely, that plants can communicate their feelings to each other:-

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/earthnews/5602419/Womens-voices-make-plants-grow-faster-finds-Royal-Horticultural-Society.html

2212
Off Topic / Is farming the root of all evil?
« on: June 23, 2009, 08:58:42 pm »
Here's an article from the Daily Telegraph condemning agriculture, more or less:-

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/scienceandtechnology/science/sciencenews/5604296/Is-farming-the-root-of-all-evil.html

It's interesting that Richard Wrangham, the retarded pro-cooked-food-advocate, comes immediately on the side of the Neolithic foods derived from agriculture as there have been serious concerns that his writings re cooked-food or whatever are mostly motivated by vegetarianism.  In other words, most of his claims re cooking supposedly "improving" raw foods, falls completely flat when one takes into account a palaeo diet rather than a vegan one.

2213
Hot Topics / Anti-Barry-groves Website
« on: June 23, 2009, 05:08:40 pm »
While looking for a section on Barry Groves' site, I came across this short section criticising Barry Groves.It's of minor interest but here for people if they're interested:-


http://holfordwatch.info/2009/01/20/barry-groves-second-opinions-website-loses-honcode-accreditation/

2214
Off Topic / Caveman's angry exit etc.
« on: June 18, 2009, 04:26:22 pm »
Here's an article about an eco-warrior/palaeoanarchist who has been evicted from his (artificial) cave after flouting ridiculous health and safety rules:-

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/5559326/Eco-warrior-evicted-from-cave-dwelling-without-fire-exit.html

2215
Off Topic / World nettle-eating championship
« on: June 14, 2009, 11:07:43 pm »
Here's an unusual world, raw-food-eating contest(at least I'm assuming it's raw, as cooked nettles wouldn't have the same painful effect):-

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/5525806/World-Stinging-Nettle-Eating-Championship-attracts-record-crowd.html

2216
General Discussion / emergency question
« on: June 12, 2009, 05:58:15 pm »
I'm discussing calories with a cooked palaeodieter on another list. Can anyone provide me with information on the issue of calories in raw foods and cooked foods?

 Wrangham claims that cooked food contains more calories(he's right re grains) but dead wrong re meats. I remember a previous discussion where someone cited info about how the calories measurement of raw and cooked foods was somehow skewed by the fact that cooked food contained less water-content thus confusing the issue and making it wrongly seem as though cooked meat had more calories. The actual fact was that raw meat had slightly more calories than cooked meat(perhaps due to nutrients not being boiled off).

Anyway, if anyone can provide me with a reference, please?

2217
Off Topic / Don't buy raw tuna
« on: June 12, 2009, 01:00:59 am »
Here's an article, among 100s of others, which states that raw tuna(sushi/sashimi) is most likely to come from endangered bluefin tuna:-

"Raw tuna in sashimi and sushi is most likely to be bluefin, which is severely threatened in the Mediterranean and overfished in the Atlantic and Pacific."

taken from:-

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23705343-details/Life+after+tuna/article.do

Bluefin tuna is way overfished. I'll grant that alternatives like farmed salmon are a bad idea as well, but please try to find wild(but environmentally-conscious) choices, instead.

2218
General Discussion / Omega-3 study
« on: June 09, 2009, 11:49:28 pm »
Here is yet another, among many thousands of studies, showing, yet again, that omega-3-rich foods are important. for health.It also mentions how omega-3-rich low-carb diets are. So much for ludicrous notions by some members claiming that cooked, grainfed meat is healthy:-


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/5476304/Eating-fish-twice-a-week-can-help-prevent-eye-disease.html

2219
Hot Topics / Dean Cain Agent of Satan!
« on: June 09, 2009, 06:45:01 pm »
OK, we've had threads focusing on celebrities who either endorsed or just practised raw meat diets. Now, herre's an example of a celebrity who makes clear his disapproval of raw meat-eating:-

http://www.flashnews.com/news/wfn2061215J24629.html

I came across the article when I saw Dean Cain featured on the ripley's believe it or not segment shown recently on youtube re aajonus' appearance:-

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIrFhfyrmS4


2221
Off Topic / book reviews
« on: May 30, 2009, 11:37:33 pm »
I intend to do some book reviews. The wrangham book is only coming out 3rd of june and I won't get it until some time later, so may be off on holiday before that. I'll do a stefansson book-review for june, though, regardless as I already have 1 of his books.

2222
I recently saw an episode of CSI NY(crap I know, but I was bored). Interestingly, though, 1 episode stood out, rather. It featured a new sensation that has been appearing in some of the more trendy sushi restaurants out there. namely, "Nyataimori", or "naked sushi parties"! Basically, it involves  men eating sushi(usually with chopsticks only allowed, but sometimes using hands) off the body of a naked woman(well, all except for a banana leaf etc. over a certain area). Here's some info on the subject:-

http://www.yak.net/fqa/410.html

Here's the only youtube video I could find on the subject(sadly it involves only women eating sushi off a naked man, rather than the reverse):-

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8qmOoczwM8

2223
Hot Topics / Favourite raw-foodist quotation debunked
« on: May 26, 2009, 06:08:10 pm »
Aajonus likes to claim that Pasteur said on his deathbed that Bechamp was right and that germs were not the problem, but that  the environment the germs were in was the real problem. Anyway, this website claims that this quotation is merely an urban legend and may be right:-

http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles/comment/pasteur.htm


And to think that I've referred to that quotation in the past on a few occasions.

That said, the above skeptic's link is also somewhat fraudulent in its 100% praise for Pasteur. It seems that Pasteur was by no means whiter than white, and, like many famous scientists, wasn't above committing scientific fraud when it suited him:-

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Pasteur

At any rate, if people come across any such links debunking standard rawist claims/quotations, feel free to post them here in the hot topics forum. I think it's important that those concerns are addressed, and not just ignored for reasons of dogma. For example, on rawpaleodiet.com, I wrote an extensive essay on the (rather rabid!) anti-raw essay on beyondveg.com, where I ruthlessly debunked most of the anti-raw comments, but also acknowledged that some pro-rawist myths were not kosher, either. This way, we can get rid of many urban legends about rawism(such as the notion that raw meat kills) by citing such topics/links - but also, we clean up our yard as regards having decent data backing up raw-foodism.

2224
Carnivorous / Zero Carb Approach / MOVED: Pemmican
« on: May 23, 2009, 09:29:10 pm »

2225
Off Topic / Shamanism in the Palaeolithic and beyond
« on: May 20, 2009, 05:19:33 pm »
Here's an interesting resume of shamanism focusing partly on the cave-paintings found in those Cro-Magnon caves:-

http://www.mystae.com/restricted/streams/scripts/shamanism.html

It goes into detail on how Palaeolithic shamans went into trance in order to do those cave-paintings and would use hallucinogenic substances(mushrooms?) etc. in order to achieve that state.

Pages: 1 ... 84 85 86 87 88 [89] 90 91 92 93 94 ... 96
SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk