Off Topic / Re: What are you listening to?
« on: September 25, 2013, 08:46:52 am »Goodnight people!
/* * Patch for filter_var() */ if(!function_exists('filter_var')){ define('FILTER_VALIDATE_IP', 'ip'); define('FILTER_FLAG_IPV4', 'ipv4'); define('FILTER_FLAG_IPV6', 'ipv6'); define('FILTER_VALIDATE_EMAIL', 'email'); define('FILTER_FLAG_EMAIL_UNICODE', 'unicode'); function filter_var($variable, $filter, $option = false){ if($filter == 'ip'){ if($option == 'ipv4'){ if(preg_match("/(\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3})/", $variable, $matches)){ $variable = $matches[1]; return $variable; } } if($option == 'ipv6'){ if(preg_match("/\s*(([:.]{0,7}[0-9a-fA-F]{0,4}){1,8})\s*/", $variable, $matches)){ $variable = $matches[1]; return $variable; } } } if($filter == 'email'){ if($option == 'unicode' || $option == false){ if(preg_match("/\s*(\S*@\S*\.\S*)\s*/", $variable, $matches)){ $variable = $matches[1]; return $variable; } } } } }
Visit our website: www.rawpaleodiet.com
Join our Yahoo Group: RawPaleoDiet
RSS Feed Latest 50 Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I never ate a snake but I would agree, as long as the smell is attractive and the taste is good.
Does it smell? How do you perceive that smell? If you like the smell, be careful anyway: don't swallow immediately but keep a small chunk in the mouth and be ready to spit if a bad taste appears after a few seconds.
Sure you can eat the flesh raw. There's no venom in the tail by the way.
Are it's pupils in the shape of a diamond (like a cat) or a circle (like a humans)? I heard that only snakes with diamond shaped pupils are poisonous, but wiki says it's venomous. I can't see in the pictures but it looks like circle pupils.
I would imagine the meat is safe as long as where you cut doesn't destroy the venom glands contaminating the meat. It could be risky. There is a reason we don't eat spiders and other colorful bugs; poison.
Do the locals eat anything else raw?
Really amazing adventures Aura.
I think its the trick with those classes, to give people a glimpse of what the are aching for but let them down and remind them that you cant just throw money at enlightenment or rewilding and expect it to happen, you really just have to do it.
Uncontacted tribes, really? Are there still some? It will be a grand experience, not easy at all I guess, but you can do it.
You can also learn yourself which plants, fruits, mushrooms, insects, etc. are edible and which ones are noxious. Just be careful: don’t immediately swallow something you don’t know but if it smells ok, take a small piece in the mouth and wait at least 6 – 8 seconds to be sure it tastes good still. But, because a certain amount is fine, it doesn’t mean that it will remain so whatever the amount. For example, some wild fruits may be tasty and beneficial in a small amount, but if we go beyond that amount, they become toxic. You can feel what is the proper amount: it gets bitter or the taste shifts to bad when it becomes noxious.
I can even "hear" the "vibration" at times when I am out in the wild - it totally fills me with joy, it has similarities to an orgasm. Call me crazy
PS : I don't dispute the fact that staying as much as possible outdoors in an unspoiled environment is beneficial for our physical and psychical well being. But it's useless and pseudoscientific to invoke Schumann resonance for that.
There is certainly a whole range of things from detrimental to beneficial to life on Earth, with some neutral ones in-between. Examples could be a planet orbiting a distant star, a few rocks in more or less somewhere, etc.
It may be “good” for the whole but bad for you as an individual. If Schumann resonance is good for the whole universe (which is probably the case) but bad for your health, what would be your benefit in trying to being exposed to it as much as you can? Since we don’t know, I wouldn’t bother about it.Right.
BTW, defining what is good for the whole is a perilous exercise. I would say that growing entropy is “bad” while decreasing entropy (negentropy) is “good”. That can be valid if consider organized complexity as “good”, but we are then back to the starting point!
Innards smell and taste awful to me, very bitter. There's not much to eat in the head and I'm strongly repealed by the thought of eating the eyes. This is certainly a cultural blockage, but I can't help it.
I like to wash the fish with seawater because the fishmongers handle it along farmed salmon and other farmed fish, ice made with chlorinated tap water and also wash it with tap water. Also I don't know how that fish had been handled before; it may have fallen on dirt or other chemical such as detergents on the boat desk, etc. It's more important to me if it is an already cut part or fillet from a big fish which could have been cut with the same knife which had just cut farmed salmon. I observed that they often don't bother to wash neither their knife nor the shelf in between and anyway if they do it is with tap water.
I buy fresh wild sea fish, cut it open, throw the innards and the head before eating the restReally? Are not they good to eat?
sometimes I even eat bones if they are small enough to be crushed.
BTW, I like to wash my fish in sea water after having cleaned it.May I ask you why? I thought of two possible reasons you do that.
The advantage an animal gains from sleeping in a tree is increased safety. There are benefits to earthing, but protection from predators is not one of them.
Back to Schumann resonances:But plenty natural phenomenon and occurrences exist without being important for life.
Many such as natural background radiation (cosmic rays, natural radioactivity), mercury emitted by volcanoes, etc. are even detrimental to life. We don’t even know if these Schumann resonances have an effect on life, and in the seemingly improbable case they would have some effect, it could as well be detrimental than beneficial.
Sure, and science itself doesn’t pretend to be the holder of the ultimate truth. On the contrary, science is a permanent questioning of previous beliefs, methodical doubt being one of the main pillars of science. But scientists are humans and are thus generally biased somehow, very often sticking to obsolete views and beliefs.
Aura, your link for this pdf you made no longer works.