Paleo Diet: Raw Paleo Diet and Lifestyle Forum

Raw Paleo Diet Forums => Personals => Topic started by: sabertooth on March 16, 2018, 09:07:05 am

Title: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: sabertooth on March 16, 2018, 09:07:05 am
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGDxjh7svtc (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGDxjh7svtc)

I would like to reach out to Sv3ride and offer a ride through my part of the world, already responded to the comment section of the video, and was wondering if anyone here has a direct line of communication to reach him?
Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: PaganGoy on March 16, 2018, 10:47:28 am
He purportedly uses or used to use a type of internet chatroom app frequently which he has had advertised on his channel before.
I can't seem to find the video of him explaining it right now though, it may have been taken down.
Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: van on March 16, 2018, 10:52:43 am
leave a comment with his last video.   
Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: PaganGoy on March 16, 2018, 11:02:59 am
Found it https://ua-video.com/c/UCPj8fSalbWRebPWo6dVeZUw (https://ua-video.com/c/UCPj8fSalbWRebPWo6dVeZUw)

Irc instructions:
Either get a program like IceChat (what I use).
www.icechat.net/site (http://www.icechat.net/site)
Or use an online client like Mibbit.
www.mibbit.com (http://www.mibbit.com)
(Go to the bottom of the page where it says chat now).
Irc info:
Channel: #sv3rige
Server: irc.sorcery.net
Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: Dingeman on March 16, 2018, 09:06:39 pm
I've been friends with Sv3rige for over 7 years, way before he started even considering eating a different diet than the SAD-diet.

I'll make sure that he gets your message. We've talked about you in the chatroom before, so I am sure that he is interested in meeting you and trying your special, wormy, high meat.
Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: sabertooth on March 16, 2018, 10:45:56 pm
Ive made contact, he will be in Kentucky around the end of the month, I should be able to help, the timing may even correspond with my next kill, so there should be fresh blood and meat to share.
Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: van on March 17, 2018, 01:35:42 am
Derick, thanks to you for taking the time to meet up with him. will love to hear your impressions after your meeting up.
Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: FRANCIS HOWARD BOND on March 17, 2018, 03:07:50 am
Great News, well done!
Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: sabertooth on May 13, 2018, 10:11:18 am
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oH6oX9wG4iU
Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: Dingeman on May 14, 2018, 06:47:30 pm
Cool stuff Derek.

Do you have anything to add about your experience meeting Sv3rige? I'm curious about your view of the meeting.
Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: goodsamaritan on May 14, 2018, 11:52:09 pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oH6oX9wG4iU

Saw this video on 4k.  Awesome.
Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: dair on May 15, 2018, 06:10:04 pm
So, he's started to use a juicer? cute...
I remember when freelee and durian rider started to promote cooked vegetables in their videos (being neither fruits, nor raw), leaving some members confused, because before they had said that cooked=toxic.
The problem is when people make very radical statements, and then somehow manage to go against their former ideology.


Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: van on May 16, 2018, 04:52:10 am
He's a 'follower' of AV.  AV said we can't hydrate with water, that animals don't need to or drink water...   Thus the milk and juice needs. Pretty hard to find fresh blood daily.   He also travels constantly,,, thus pretty hard to find good fats to go along with his steaks,, thus, in part, he's trading fat for carbs from the juice, as you'll notice the oranges he uses to 'make it taste better'.  Odd that he doesn't seem to remember the negative things he's said about vegs.  But then maybe he believes the plants' toxins are locked up in the pulp.   I do have the experience when I shredded and juiced broccoli stems that if I cut off the tough exterior and the shredded and sucked the juice, it was much tastier.  It makes sense if you think about the plants first line of defense being it's skin and that is where the concentration of pesticides are.    The tops of broccoli are abysmal by themselves....
Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: jibrael on May 18, 2018, 04:02:36 pm
He's a 'follower' of AV.  AV said we can't hydrate with water, that animals don't need to or drink water...   Thus the milk and juice needs. Pretty hard to find fresh blood daily.   He also travels constantly,,, thus pretty hard to find good fats to go along with his steaks,, thus, in part, he's trading fat for carbs from the juice, as you'll notice the oranges he uses to 'make it taste better'.  Odd that he doesn't seem to remember the negative things he's said about vegs.  But then maybe he believes the plants' toxins are locked up in the pulp.   I do have the experience when I shredded and juiced broccoli stems that if I cut off the tough exterior and the shredded and sucked the juice, it was much tastier.  It makes sense if you think about the plants first line of defense being it's skin and that is where the concentration of pesticides are.    The tops of broccoli are abysmal by themselves....

Van: What are your final conclusions?

(1) Vegetable Juices:
Are the juices from carrots, reddish etc are hydrating and could be used?

(2) In Video, Derek showed that he makes the broths of bones for 3-4 days using little vinegar. After that he eats the bones for the minerals and he thinks it is absolutely necessary for those who do the raw meat diet.

Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: van on May 18, 2018, 10:08:15 pm
I really don't know.  Currently, I'm experimenting with the Paleomedicina's diet suggestions, which include only meat and fat.  Thus, it's hard for me to comment. 
    They have an interesting take on our need for extra minerals from eating bones.  In conversation with them, they believe that by eating organs with meat that all nutrients are supplied including those found or believed to be needed only in bones.  I tried making bone broth a few times, but couldn't get myself to eat it.  It may have been due to eating raw for over 42 years ( mental acculturation ), but couldn't get over the cooked taste.  When I watch Derick in the video eat the softened bones, part of me thinks, wow, he's getting good amounts of minerals that I'm not, and then I think that he could easily be overdoing it especially with 'cooked' proteins, fats and minerals that may be hard for the body to fully utilize and cause problems later.  I don't know.  My guess is that he's guessing as to how much to eat, as there probably isn't much of a stop. But then, there may be. I haven't heard him comment.
   Looking at the composition of bone, I can't find much mg.  Wonder if he's overloading on Ca. by doing so?
     Carrots have a lot of sugar, so be careful if juicing them.    I still like the practice ( over machine juicing ) of fine shredding hard veggies, like radish, cabbage etc. and then sucking the juice out and spitting the pulp out.   It helps with giving you the info as to when you've had enough.  It's Way easy to overdue it with juice when just throwing it down your throat.  Try eating any real green leafy veg, noticing the stop that comes pretty quickly, and then relate that to juicing greens, especially when adding sweeteners like carrot or apple. 
    The real suggestion is to experiment for yourself, and take notice over time how it works. It's easy to believe that what you're doing works.
Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: PaganGoy on May 19, 2018, 01:55:41 am
He only recommends eating low carb vegetables mainly cucumber and kohlrabbi and to mix it up frequently so as to not bare the brunt of the same anti nutrient affect over time.
I have tried the slow cooker cooked bones thing it is very satiating and a great idea as a supplement.
Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: jibrael on May 19, 2018, 02:57:39 am
Thanks Van and PaganGoy.

How much fat is being suggested on this diet?



Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: Qondrar_The_Redeemer on May 19, 2018, 03:16:47 am
Regarding the bones:
Bones have an extremely high amount of calcium (highest of any food by far) in them, along with a high phosphorus content. The bone marrow within also has a high calcium content, containing as much as most dairy.

How much fat is being suggested on this diet?

I'd say you should follow your instincts and eat as much as you'd like. If you are trying to gain weight, you could try eating more, and if you are trying to lose weight, eating less fat. But only you know how much you should eat.

I personally eat anywhere from 200-400 grams of fat, not sure how that compares to everyone else.




Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: jibrael on May 19, 2018, 03:22:49 am
Regarding the bones:
Bones have an extremely high amount of calcium (highest of any food by far) in them, along with a high phosphorus content. The bone marrow within also has a high calcium content, containing as much as most dairy.

Did the inuits eat fish bones in their traditional diet?

According to the following scientific paper, the calcium from fish bones is absorbed easily by the humans.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2916003/

Calcium from salmon and cod bone is well absorbed in young healthy men



Quote
I personally eat anywhere from 200-400 grams of fat, not sure how that compares to everyone else.

And how much grams of proteins are you consuming with 400 grams of fat?
Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: Qondrar_The_Redeemer on May 19, 2018, 03:32:28 am
Did the inuits eat fish bones in their traditional diet?

According to the following scientific paper, the calcium from fish bones is absorbed easily by the humans.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2916003/

Calcium from salmon and cod bone is well absorbed in young healthy men
I don't know, but I would assume they would eat the smaller bones of certain fish. I have read that they used larger bones for tools.

And how much grams of proteins are you consuming with 400 grams of fat?
Around 100-160 grams of protein a day.
Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: van on May 19, 2018, 03:46:40 am
that's my point with the high ca. content of bones...  For years we have been told to get lots of ca.  Now, I read more about the balance of mg. with ca. and others.    and, how excess ca. can contribute to the plaque on arteries..   Some have written that it drops out of suspension from the blood.   I don't know if that is true when the source is cooked bones, but do have direct experience when younger and taking mineral supplements in the form of powders ot tablets where I would develop hardened stone like pebbles underneath tissue where my prosthetic socket pressures were high.  This happened so many times while trying 'another' form of mineral supplement that there is No doubt of the phenomena.  Simply too many immediate occurrences to be a coincidence.
   
Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: Qondrar_The_Redeemer on May 19, 2018, 04:05:01 am
that's my point with the high ca. content of bones...  For years we have been told to get lots of ca.  Now, I read more about the balance of mg. with ca. and others.    and, how excess ca. can contribute to the plaque on arteries..   Some have written that it drops out of suspension from the blood.   I don't know if that is true when the source is cooked bones, but do have direct experience when younger and taking mineral supplements in the form of powders ot tablets where I would develop hardened stone like pebbles underneath tissue where my prosthetic socket pressures were high.  This happened so many times while trying 'another' form of mineral supplement that there is No doubt of the phenomena.  Simply too many immediate occurrences to be a coincidence.
 

It seems that bones actually vastly exceed the Upper Intake Level of Calcium (2.5 grams) when consumed, even in amounts not considered that large (100 grams for example). Now, perhaps not all of it is getting absorbed, but it makes you think...

100 grams of bones would have anywhere from 13 to 23! grams of calcium. It  seems I was also wrong when I said it contained "only" a high phosphorus content. It turns out that is also huge (highest of any food?), at 6 to 10 grams per 100 grams. The tolerable Upper Intake Level of Phosphorus is only 4 grams, so again, it exceeds that.
Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: van on May 19, 2018, 08:48:27 am
interesting,, where are you going for your info. would like to have it for when I look.  thanks
Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: Qondrar_The_Redeemer on May 19, 2018, 09:36:47 am
interesting,, where are you going for your info. would like to have it for when I look.  thanks
Human bones:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1062811/

Rat bones:
http://www.jbc.org/content/79/1/147.full.pdf

Chicken bones:
http://www.retrieverpro.com/dog-healthy-food-calcium/

The values I listed before were for rat bones. Some animals have a higher/lower calcium and phosphorus percentage. Chicken bones, for example, are 30% calcium (30 grams calcium/100 grams of bone) and 15% phosphorus (15 grams phosphorus/100 grams of bone).
Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: jibrael on May 19, 2018, 12:16:48 pm
It seems that bones actually vastly exceed the Upper Intake Level of Calcium (2.5 grams) when consumed, even in amounts not considered that large (100 grams for example). Now, perhaps not all of it is getting absorbed, but it makes you think...

100 grams of bones would have anywhere from 13 to 23! grams of calcium. It  seems I was also wrong when I said it contained "only" a high phosphorus content. It turns out that is also huge (highest of any food?), at 6 to 10 grams per 100 grams. The tolerable Upper Intake Level of Phosphorus is only 4 grams, so again, it exceeds that.

Ok.

But what about the lower limits?

How could we get calcium and phosphorous from organs and meat diet only?

Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: Qondrar_The_Redeemer on May 19, 2018, 02:06:59 pm
Ok.

But what about the lower limits?

How could we get calcium and phosphorous from organs and meat diet only?
I don't mean to discourage anyone from eating bones, I just personally think it is more natural to eat smaller bones raw than larger ones cooked. Perhaps Derek is on to something, and the extremely large amounts of calcium and phosphorus are useful, I couldn't say. You could also eat lower amount, no need to overeat on bones. Although I am curious just how much is actually absorbed.

The best source of calcium other than bones would be bone marrow. Phosphorus is present in all types of meat (muscle and organs), and shouldn't be a problem.

Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: van on May 19, 2018, 11:06:38 pm
I'd love to see the source for the ca. in marrow.  thanks
Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: Qondrar_The_Redeemer on May 19, 2018, 11:11:36 pm
I'd love to see the source for the ca. in marrow.  thanks
Marrow has around 277.3 to 339.7 mg of calcium per 100 grams (in reindeer) according to this:

Level of selected nutrients in meat, liver, tallow and bone marrow from semi-domesticated reindeer (Rangifer t. tarandus L.):
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3417664/

It shows plenty of other vitamins/minerals/proteins/fats in reindeer  muscle, liver, tallow and bone marrow.
Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: van on May 20, 2018, 12:01:44 am
good, thanks
Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: sabertooth on May 21, 2018, 02:07:08 am
Regarding bones,

I haven't mentioned my latest addition to the diet here mainly because of the anti cooking nature of the forum, and partly because I've only been experimenting with eating dissolved bone for the last 4 months, and wanted to be sure there were not any negative issues before presenting my findings.

One of the main problems I have noticed while going an a long term primarily raw meat based diet, is in obtaining optimal minerals and electrolytes from food sources. I will work long hours in hot conditions and often sweat intensely, leaving me at times depleted to the point of cramps muscle, joint soreness and also seemingly more prolonged recovery times. This is something I have always experienced and was much worse before going paleo, when I had much more drastic symptoms of mineral deficiencies.

Over the years I have tried to get every bit of minerals and electrolytes possible by drinking blood, eating all the tissues and organs and it still sometimes seems like its not quite enough. The sheep I consume only have so much blood and marrow, and it would be difficult for me to obtain any extra to supplement with. I have also experimented with things like magnesium supplements, Clay and D.E in the past without much success. Dairy seems to help with providing minerals but has other negative effects which makes it not useful in the long term. Eating the occasional eggs, fish, greens nuts and vegetation seems to help add a better overall mineral ballance, but still does not seem quite optimal.

Since going paleo I have been more and more curious of the benefits of eating bones especially after witnessing my dogs devour whole raw bones, and seem to thrive. The problem is humans in general do not have bone crushing teeth and jaws. I have tried chewing the soft bone and extract marrow from the ribs, and will chew connective tissue till my jaw hurts. I crave the taste but just could never figure out a way to make it work...there are industrial granders which would work ideal, but I dont have 3,000 or so odd dollars to invest in an experiment....so I started to devise ways to soften bones in a crock pot.

I would also like to mention that I extremely dislike bone broth, the taste is repulsive and it always sits heavy in my stomach. To get around the taste of cooked meat I first scrap the bones as clean as possible then place them in a crock pot with two cups of apple cider vinegar on low for about 24 hours. Then I strain off all the broth and rinse all the cooked meat from the bones, afterwards I put back the clean bones into the crock pot with spring water and two more cups of vinegar and leave it on warm for about three days.

This way all allows for much of the horrid taste of cooked meat to be discarded leaving a very soft, clean bone which can be eaten easily. I have recently started keeping the temp on low warm and doing a second rinse cycle to get an even cleaner taste and softer consistency. The large joints will turn into a honeycomb of delicious mineral goodness.

I ate a whole lot in the beginning and besides a little constipated at first, there hasn't been any negative issues. While on the positive side I have noticed much less cramping and soreness, shorter recovery time, and more overall strength and endurance. I usually will snack on bones throughout the day now, eating a couple of bites here and there shortly before meals or as a late night snack before bed.
 

 
Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: Qondrar_The_Redeemer on May 21, 2018, 03:49:36 am
Very interesting. Do you eat any other animals than sheep? You could get more blood and marrow from larger animals, along with any other parts of the animal (organs, muscle, whatever).
And if you do only eat sheep, any reason why you prefer sheep over other animals?

Also, in regards to bones, how much do you eat?
Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: Dingeman on May 21, 2018, 04:54:21 am
You're saying you couldn't get enough minerals from fish?
What about oysters/mussels? Oysters especially are so salty to me, it would be hard to not get enough minerals from them. They are traditionally eaten raw as well..
Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: Qondrar_The_Redeemer on May 21, 2018, 05:51:23 am
You're saying you couldn't get enough minerals from fish?
What about oysters/mussels? Oysters especially are so salty to me, it would be hard to not get enough minerals from them. They are traditionally eaten raw as well..
Looking at it from a mineral perspective, oysters tend to be very high (sometimes the highest, depending on the species) in zinc, high in copper and selenium. Potassium, magnesium and sodium tends to be similar between fish, oysters and land animals. Although it could be the salt water you are tasting, in which case you would be getting some additional minerals, albeit not much. Mostly some extra sodium.
 
With all the organs he eats, he should easily be getting all the selenium, manganese, copper, zinc, phosphorus, iron and calcium. The only ones (and only if he is not consuming a large enough volume of food) which in general would be below recommended daily intake would be magnesium, potassium and sodium. Blood has a pretty high potassium and sodium content, although it is not as high in magnesium. On paper he should be getting everything. It's also very bioavailable.

But there's probably more to it than just paper values of what you should be getting. And looking at it, he should mostly be getting calcium and phosphorus from bones.
Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: sabertooth on May 21, 2018, 11:15:16 am
Very interesting. Do you eat any other animals than sheep? You could get more blood and marrow from larger animals, along with any other parts of the animal (organs, muscle, whatever).
And if you do only eat sheep, any reason why you prefer sheep over other animals?

Also, in regards to bones, how much do you eat?

I typically prefer sheep for a number of reasons.....Most cows in my area are grazed in less than optimal conditions and do not taste good to me...plus bovine fats seem to be much more waxy in consistency than sheep fat which is much more creamy and easier to digest in the copious amounts I consume. Even if it was possible to source good quality organs, marrow and blood from animals I do not butcher, it would be difficult to afford paying market price for all those extras in the long term.

I usually eat only a few ounces of bones a day.. a couple of ribs, half a scapula, or a big knuckle joint...the amount varies depending on craving and how much I have to pick from.

You're saying you couldn't get enough minerals from fish?
What about oysters/mussels? Oysters especially are so salty to me, it would be hard to not get enough minerals from them. They are traditionally eaten raw as well..

I experimented with trying to add larger amounts of seafood for minerals, a couple years back after I got a hair test which showed I was low in magnesium calcium and selenium. Some experts claim that hair analisis is not accurate, the efficacy of such testing is a separate topic of debate but from my experience they can give an indication if there are mineral imbalances or deficiencies....though it is still uncertain what levels are optimal for any particular individual.

For a couple of months I ate lots of oysters, fish, crab, scallops...It was very expensive and after some time I didn't get any really positive effect, and actually started noticing weird symptoms like headache, cloudy thinking and muscle twitching...I went back for an other hair test and it showed that my mineral levels were improved, but my mercury level was also way up, where it had been undetectable from before. After that I quit eating most seafood, and the symptoms went away...I haven't gone back for any more testing yet....might give it a couple more months of supplementing with bones just to see where the levels are.

Looking at it from a mineral perspective, oysters tend to be very high (sometimes the highest, depending on the species) in zinc, high in copper and selenium. Potassium, magnesium and sodium tends to be similar between fish, oysters and land animals. Although it could be the salt water you are tasting, in which case you would be getting some additional minerals, albeit not much. Mostly some extra sodium.
 
With all the organs he eats, he should easily be getting all the selenium, manganese, copper, zinc, phosphorus, iron and calcium. The only ones (and only if he is not consuming a large enough volume of food) which in general would be below recommended daily intake would be magnesium, potassium and sodium. Blood has a pretty high potassium and sodium content, although it is not as high in magnesium. On paper he should be getting everything. It's also very bioavailable.

But there's probably more to it than just paper values of what you should be getting. And looking at it, he should mostly be getting calcium and phosphorus from bones.


We are all in uncharted territory when trying to quantify optimal mineral consumption ratios, Its nearly impossible to scientifically analyze ones day to day needs and prescribe a given protocol. Ive given up all hope in nutritional science to show me the way and been running on instinct for so long that following my cravings have become second nature. When I am in need of lacking nutrients I can feel it...Its not anything like the extreme malnourishment of my vegetarian days....for the most part I am very well nourished and any blood test profile would likely be well within the 'normative', but every now and then there is a feeling that if only I had an extra something or other then everything would be prime. Even alpha wolfs who have access to all the meat they can eat will still knaw on a bone every now and then, which points to there being something in the actual bone tissue they crave from time to time.
 
I have also noticed a dramatic increase in the flexibility of my joints and tendons since beginning to eat bones. I feel much more loose and limber and am progressing much better when I take my weekly flexibility class.
Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: TylerDurden on May 21, 2018, 07:49:10 pm
I typically prefer sheep for a number of reasons.....
For a moment there, I had a huge grin on my face!! I think the preferred term of usage is either "lamb" or "mutton"! Never mind...
Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: RogueFarmer on May 21, 2018, 09:18:55 pm
As you will probably recall, wolves eat a large percentage of their diet (perhaps 60-70% and sometimes more) in mice, which they eat whole. In the past my dogs seem to have really enjoy eating desiccated, rotten, sun dried fish that would show up along the river...
Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: jibrael on May 23, 2018, 07:19:20 pm
I would also like to mention that I extremely dislike bone broth, the taste is repulsive and it always sits heavy in my stomach. To get around the taste of cooked meat I first scrap the bones as clean as possible then place them in a crock pot with two cups of apple cider vinegar on low for about 24 hours. Then I strain off all the broth and rinse all the cooked meat from the bones, afterwards I put back the clean bones into the crock pot with spring water and two more cups of vinegar and leave it on warm for about three days.

This way all allows for much of the horrid taste of cooked meat to be discarded leaving a very soft, clean bone which can be eaten easily. I have recently started keeping the temp on low warm and doing a second rinse cycle to get an even cleaner taste and softer consistency. The large joints will turn into a honeycomb of delicious mineral goodness.

Derek, sometimes I feel I am little bit duffer.

May I ask you why you use "vinegar" if you discard the broth and don't drink it?

My understanding is this that people use vinegar so that the calcium comes out of the bone and lands into the broth, so that people can get it from the broth and they don't have to chew the bones for the calcium.

But in your case, you discard the broth and eat the bones. Then would it not be better to not to use the vinegar, so that the calcium stays in the bones when you eat them?
Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: sabertooth on May 28, 2018, 12:08:19 am
People who consume bone broth typically do not eat the whole bones, and will indeed get some level of mineral nutrition from acidicly induced leaching...but just because some of the minerals leech out into the broth, does not take away from the core mineral values of the actual bone in any significant way. The bone tissue matrix is still full of bioavailable minerals even after the broth is extracted and can these leftover minerals are perfectly bioavailably utilized when eaten.

Another benefit to my method is that by running multiple rinse cycles, much of the AGEs in the cooked proteins as well as the rancid heat deteriorated fats are washed out, leaving a more pure mineral substrate that is much more appealing to my cravin sense.

I have also tried using lemon juice which also works...but doesn't seem to keep as fresh tasting for days on end like the apple cider vinegar. I also prefer the more subtle taste of lightly vinegary soft bones, vinegar seems to be good for dissolving out the cooked marrow and protein residue which is what typically gives bone broths their abhorrent taste.

 
Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: van on May 28, 2018, 12:47:21 am
I don't know Derick, bones, I've heard are mostly protein. ??
Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: Qondrar_The_Redeemer on May 28, 2018, 01:24:40 am
I don't know Derick, bones, I've heard are mostly protein. ??
What? Where did you read/hear that? Bones should contain about 10 to 20 percent water and 60 to 70 percent bone mineral. The remaining material is mostly collagen with trace amounts of proteins and inorganic salts.
Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: van on May 28, 2018, 03:32:10 am
depends which source,, I saw your source as cited...  Others state that 20 percent is organic matter which is mainly proteins/collagen  and growth factors etc.   So yes, mostly minerals, but tightly bound with proteins.
   I don't doubt there is value to eating cooked bones, peoples have benefited for eons.
Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: Qondrar_The_Redeemer on May 28, 2018, 05:19:38 am
depends which source,, I saw your source as cited...  Others state that 20 percent is organic matter which is mainly proteins/collagen  and growth factors etc.   So yes, mostly minerals, but tightly bound with proteins.
   I don't doubt there is value to eating cooked bones, peoples have benefited for eons.
Well, the source does say 10-20% and 60-70%. 60+10=70%. So 30% could potentially be collagen, proteins and inorganic salts.

Well, Derek seems to be benefiting from it, right now. Although I am interested how much of a difference it would make if he consumed raw bones (smaller bones or bone meal).
Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: van on May 28, 2018, 07:11:56 am
 Yeah, like I"ve said,  a horse file kept in the freezer with empty marrow bones kept in the fridge, and you've got fresh raw bone powder any time of the day. 
   But then I'll admit, not being a chemist or biologist, I really have no clue as to whether minerals  become 'inorganic' or dead or detrimental to your health when cooked, especially for such prolonged periods of time.
    Paleomedicina group believes that dogs seem to love bones due to the co-existence of man and dogs from early times when man hunted big game and threw the bones to the dogs.  They treat dogs with cancer, etc. and feed no bones, completely contrary to how I've fed my dogs with whole raw fresh lamb, bone included for over twenty years...
    If bones are not needed, it can only be because the minerals that is in meat, organs and fat have enough so that the body fully utilizes and doesn't expend minerals wastefully, or because toxic plants eaten bind with minerals and cause deficiency. 
Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: sabertooth on June 03, 2018, 04:54:43 am
For now Im content to keep using a moderate amount of dissolved bone mineral, and insist that I feel benefits from doing so. My strength and flexibility seem to be much improved in the last few months, and I dont get cramps as much as before even when working long hours in the heat.

I would presume that there are trade offs when considering raw vs cooking in vinegar. I feel that rinsing off the bits of flesh fat and greasy broth removes the majority of cooked toxins from the bone mineral. Some levels may remain but in my case i feel the benefits of the minerals outway the risk of small amounts of cooked protein residue. The taste is pleasantly clean and pure and doesn't cause the aversion that cooked meat and broth evoke.

Perhaps Raw bone meal has similar benefits without any risk, but I am not sure either way? I use to file bones by hand to get small amounts of bone meal, but it was a lot of effort for little return, then I lost my old file and the new one i bought seemed cheaper and metal would flake off of it, making me think that maybe filing isn't the best method, unless you are absolutely sure about the purity of the metal.

Digestibility of vinegar dissolved vs raw is also a matter of debate. Im not sure that raw ground bone meal would be as bioavailable as dissolved bones. I use to chew on the raw bone meal like gum and it would never fully break down....though it is a good method for polishing your teeth...while the dissolved bone seems to melt im my mouth with very little effort, which may indicate that the minerals may be eassier to assimilate....

Perhaps the variables are dependant upon the individuals needs....some people may have more drastic deficiencies than others....... people with mineral deficiencies will often also have enzyme deficiencies making them less able to absorb minerals from raw bones...for such individuals disoved bones may add a necessary boost in enzyme forming bioavailable minerals.(there is definitely a synergy between the apple cider vinegar and the bone mineral which seems to be good for overall digestion, and should be explored more deeply)

Perhaps people who are already fairly well balanced don't need any major supplementation, and having optimal enzymatic functioning would do fine with occasionally consuming small amounts of raw bone meal and whole small bones from small animals.

Perhaps some combination of raw bone meal and dissolved bone mineral could be used in a best of both worlds scenario, which when combined may provide benefits far beyond the majority of the more dubious methods of mineral supplementation currently heralded by modern nutritional science.


In the end analisis its still much a matter for debate whither any such supplementation is "necessary" at all, so long as there are enough prime quality organs, marrow, blood, connective tissue, and what not...But I assume that for many of us it may be difficult to obtain optimal ratios of such mineral dense animal foods, and for many suffering from lifelong mineral deficiency or metal toxicity, supplementation with bone may be beneficial for chelation and regeneration.

Right now I am somewhat limited financially and logistically, so am attempting to extract every bit of nutrition from the one animal I kill every month...being a member of the working class on a tight budget, its difficult for me to afford buying extra marrow and quality organs, even if I could find sources that were trustworthy.......quality blood is near impossible to find at the market level....Im not yet desperate enough to go full cheebacabra, draining blood from livestock in the night..... some day if times get apocalyptic I may have to go full vampire... ;)kidding aside; I've had such a tough time attempting to economically source for extras, that its been much more feasible a solution to source the best quality mutton on hoof and devise ways to maximize nutrition available from each animal.
Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: Common One on July 03, 2018, 09:15:38 am
Is that rendered fat in the blue bowl at the top?

https://i.imgur.com/l3awT67.jpg
Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: sabertooth on July 03, 2018, 11:32:13 am
Its coconut butter
Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: Common One on July 03, 2018, 11:53:37 am
The texture looks very nice. I eat coconut butter sometimes but it doesn't looks as good as yours, here.

Thanks for sharing the video. It's a really nice watch.
Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: Qondrar_The_Redeemer on July 07, 2018, 12:07:39 am
Its coconut butter
Any particular reason you eat coconut butter?
Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: van on July 07, 2018, 03:14:28 am
I bet you bucks that if you did an enzyme assay on c. butter you'd find it totally devoid of enzymes and more particular that the fats have been damaged by oxidation and heat.   Getting dried coconut to butter consistency most probably takes a heck of a lot of grinding which most probably creates a heck of a lot of heat, not to mention the air that gets driven into the product in the process.  I've tried buying/eating it at least a couple of times, and find it anything but fresh.   But then, it's probably a heck of a lot better than eating peanut butter.
Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: sabertooth on July 07, 2018, 05:28:08 am
Perhaps, my coconut butter habit is a mere idiosyncratic indulgence which does not have any tangible merit for most other people...or I may even have become physically addicted to the stuff having eaten over a pound a week for the last 8 years. Still I feel there is more to it than can be dismissed by the paradigm of it not being a truly raw food.

I have found that coconut butter doesn't have the overtly laxative effect like raw coconuts, so perhaps some of the enzymatic properties are diminished in the drying process, but that does not necessarily mean its a bad thing...just as how some people will soak or lightly roast nuts to diminish their anti nutrient property.

Coconut fat is one of the most stable of plant based fats and the butter I eat in no way has any hint of being rancid. Lauric acid a main component of coconut fat has a number of documented properties which boost the immune system and support overall healthy fat metabolism. I think I have some degree of physical dependance upon these medium chain fatty acids and experiments of eating more animal fats while cutting out all coconut seem to negatively effect my ability to optimally metabolise fat, though I havent gone into to much depth as to figure out why, because I typically do so well with the current fat ratio combination. 

Lauric acid is also found in large quantities in human breast milk, but since I haven't got a regular free range paleo supply of that, Im not sure about how to obtain quality sources other than coconut.

I would also state that I am really picky about coconuts and don't much like the ones available at the local markets. Every now and then a good shipment will come in and I have made good quality coconut cream in the past, but the cost, labor, and availability has made it so that I cant do it on any regular basis.

I also do not like most of the brands on the market and prefer Artisan Brand over most others. It is low temperature processed, is labeled raw and has a taste which is much fresher than others. All it is is dehydrated and blended coconut, and it taste almost exactly like the homemade coconut butter I made a few years ago, only its much less expensive and time consuming.
Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: Qondrar_The_Redeemer on July 07, 2018, 06:40:18 am
Perhaps, my coconut butter habit is a mere idiosyncratic indulgence which does not have any tangible merit for most other people...or I may even have become physically addicted to the stuff having eaten over a pound a week for the last 8 years. Still I feel there is more to it than can be dismissed by the paradigm of it not being a truly raw food.

I have found that coconut butter doesn't have the overtly laxative effect like raw coconuts, so perhaps some of the enzymatic properties are diminished in the drying process, but that does not necessarily mean its a bad thing...just as how some people will soak or lightly roast nuts to diminish their anti nutrient property.

Coconut fat is one of the most stable of plant based fats and the butter I eat in no way has any hint of being rancid. Lauric acid a main component of coconut fat has a number of documented properties which boost the immune system and support overall healthy fat metabolism. I think I have some degree of physical dependance upon these medium chain fatty acids and experiments of eating more animal fats while cutting out all coconut seem to negatively effect my ability to optimally metabolise fat, though I havent gone into to much depth as to figure out why, because I typically do so well with the current fat ratio combination. 

Lauric acid is also found in large quantities in human breast milk, but since I haven't got a regular free range paleo supply of that, Im not sure about how to obtain quality sources other than coconut.

I would also state that I am really picky about coconuts and don't much like the ones available at the local markets. Every now and then a good shipment will come in and I have made good quality coconut cream in the past, but the cost, labor, and availability has made it so that I cant do it on any regular basis.

I also do not like most of the brands on the market and prefer Artisan Brand over most others. It is low temperature processed, is labeled raw and has a taste which is much fresher than others. All it is is dehydrated and blended coconut, and it taste almost exactly like the homemade coconut butter I made a few years ago, only its much less expensive and time consuming.
Personally, back when I was eating a cooked ketogenic diet, I found coconut butter to be better taste and texture wise than coconut oil. Albeit not as good as of the things I'm eating now and was eating, I would put it on par with regular pasteurized butter. Not really the best, although if you are getting better quality, that could be the reason why yours is better. I am not really convinced eating non-raw coconuts is a good idea (nor would I personally eat coconuts raw myself, as I get acne even from pure coconut fat/oil), although I will agree that it is the most stable plant fat and probably the best plant fat when consumed raw as well.

Regarding lauric acid, all dairy has it, including that of other animals, not just humans. It is interesting that while lauric acid supposedly helps with acne, both coconuts and dairy tend to give me some minor acne (very minor compared to before, but still). Given that humans should probably not be consuming dairy their entire lives, and that the certain plant fats containing lauric acid may not always have been available depending on the environment (and my own personal experience with both coconuts and dairy), I remain unconvinced of the benefits of it, although I am open to the idea that it may help someone, somewhere.

If you think it benefits you, then it might be a good idea, but how much experimenting have you done with it? Have you tried prolonged periods without it and then with it? And if you did, what did you notice?
Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: van on July 07, 2018, 10:03:28 am
Yes, I've bought artisan brand myself.
Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: sabertooth on July 07, 2018, 10:23:22 am
Acne is often a symptom of liver congestion, or some metabolic condition where excess aggravants arent effectively eliminated by the filtration organs and so toxins are excreted through the skin where they can back up in the oil glands and are eaten/broken down by bacteria, sometimes causing pimples to erupt.

Sometimes if the liver cannot break down certain fats and proteins then the excess is flushed out though the skin and causes outbreaks....everyone is built a little differently in this regard and I have very clear skin and no issues with acne, exect for on rare occasions if I get a less than optimal animal I might have a stray pimple or sore lymph node.

Typically there are multiple factors involved in these issues....such as with dairy; it isn't the Lauric acid which causes intolerance, it is the combination of lactose cassine and other proteins that gunk up the works...the good bad and ugly get all mangled up in the body so its difficult to tell which component is actually causing the issue. Bad organ meat, chemical toxicity, stress, antigenic plant proteins, and a whole host of other factors could overload the liver and weaken ones ability to properly utilize elements such as lauric acid.

The point about only human milk being a suitable source for Lauric acid, is a little bit of a tongue in cheek recognition that most animal milks though they contain good medium chain fatty acids, are also full of lactose and proteins which are problematic....while dreaming there just might be paleo pure maiden with nipples of manna that overfloweth. When the mother of my children was producing milk I would take some every now and then without any issue, and she ate horribly. Imagine a purely pasture raised meat feed woman that does not consume any aberrant materials would produce milk with the least amount of antagonistic elements. Of course this is all a conjecture and finding optimal test subjects would be near impossible, not to mention the ethical difficulties involved. So for now I generally disavow most dairy and believe that there are plenty of other less metabolically aggravating ways to obtain the proper balance of fatty acids, protein, and carbs.

I still insist that the Artisana Brand is Raw, and a whole food not any more processed than air dried jerky....and I am convinced I am either  physically or psychologically addicted to it in some way. Its been a while since I have tried to stop but from what I remember.... If I fast from everything there isn't any issue, and I feel just fine, but if I go a couple of days with only meat and fat I will begin to lose my appetite and the fat I eat doesn't seem to digest as well, and my blood sugar seems to drop. Ive experimented with other forms of low glycemic carbs, but after a few days without coconut, any other plant fiber foods tend mess up the microbiome balance, causing bloating and sometimes diarrhea, then as soon as I eat a little coconut everything goes back to being super regular and fine. I came to this diet with a lot of overgrowth issues and digestive insufficiency along with glycemic intolerances and other issues that most people haven't experienced, such as severe chronic viral episodes. Real early into my transition I believed the coconut butter help relieve a number of these symptoms, and worked especially well in curbing yeast overgrowth and the chronic viral outbreaks...I also had a damaged liver and many metabolic anomalies.....during this period of the first few months of my transition into raw paleo I was eating up to half a pound of coconut butted a day, and must of developed an extreme tolerance, reaching a level of adaptability most people would never attempt under other circumstances. Its very possible that I am a freak of nature and my tolerance to absurdly high levels of coconut cannot be replicated in most other people.

Maybe I will try to experiment with a withdrawal sometime in the future, and if I do I will post any noticeable effects.
Title: Re: Contacting Sv3rige
Post by: sabertooth on July 07, 2018, 10:27:11 am
Yes, I've bought artisan brand myself.
Its an expensive habit, 10 dollars a jar at the local Co-Op, I now buy it from Amazon by the 8 pound tub