Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - High-king

Pages: [1]
1
Hot Topics / We are somethingawfuls link of the day
« on: February 19, 2010, 10:41:54 pm »
Just for your information, we are Somethingawful.com Awful link of the day. Welcome goons! : )

edit: forgot, link: http://www.somethingawful.com/d/awful-links/raw-paleo-forum.php

2
General Discussion / partly raw?
« on: March 14, 2009, 01:25:18 pm »
So I've heard you need to eat a largely raw diet in order for the taste change to occur, but is it possible to eat a partly raw/cooked diet without losing the taste for one or the other? I doubt I'll find organic chicken around here, and I worry about salmonella

3
General Discussion / rotten meat in the wild?
« on: November 12, 2008, 08:44:29 pm »
I wonder, when hunting animals in the wild, is it safe to eat the meat after it rots without any sort of preservation technique? Will it be much the same as eating high-meat?

Thank you

4
General Discussion / other peoples reactions?
« on: November 11, 2008, 12:33:05 pm »
how have those close to you reacted when they have found out about your diet? Has friends/family/spouse had a fit about it?

My parents don't know yet, I'm sure my dad would have a major fit about it. When i told him about the WAPD diet and Dr. Prices expedition and research, he refused to acknowledge the benefits ("what is a perfect bone structure?" "if this diet is so good then why hasn't the government/medical community told us about it?" "everything is moderation in good(talking about flour here)" "There ain't enough animal organs to go around, therefor it's sloppy science!" "our ancestors lived to be 40")

So anyone want to share their experience!

5
Hot Topics / Christopher Wanjek: Demented Schizo
« on: November 10, 2008, 06:31:55 pm »
while surfing around live science, I found some anti-raw articles by a man who has a strange habit of contradicting himself.

http://www.livescience.com/health/060704_bad_raw_food.html

Quote
Despite major flaws in the raw diet philosophy, one needs to question why a so-called natural diet leaves the dieter dependent on pills for B12 (impossible to get without animal products, such as meat or eggs) or zinc (very hard to get on a raw diet).

you got to admit that he has a point! I mean, if we only live on raw meat, how are we supposed to get B12, which only exists in meat?
(yes, he was talking about diets containing raw meat... At least in previous paragraph)

Quote
Raw foods certainly aren't safer than cooked food, as some claim.  Most commercial chicken and a good deal of beef and pork, sadly, are loaded with bacteria and parasites

if you click on "loaded with bacteria", you come to another one of his articles that says

Quote
Pity the poor bacterium, the Rodney Dangerfield of the unicellular world.  It eats our trash, makes soil fertile, turns the food we swallow into useful vitamins, and yet it gets no respect.  Most people, when you get right down to it, are just plain bacteria bigots.  They want to run all 2,000-plus species of bacteria out of town just because of a few ornery germs that can harm us.

and lastly, has anyone else heard of this?

Quote
That said, humans have always eaten some cooked food.  So, too, do many land animals; and so did our human ancestors.  How?  Largely in the form of roasted grasshoppers or other small critters caught in forest fires and brushfires.  Fire foraging was quite natural and helped secure our survival.  This is how we developed the taste for cooked food.

this statement just sounds so obscure

6
General Discussion / how long is raw fish safe to eat
« on: October 24, 2008, 03:00:45 am »
I bought some WHOLE fresh fish this Tuesday, so today is the third day since I bought it. I've kept it refrigerated, checked it and it still looks safe.

but is it safe to eat?

btw, the fish is called brisling if you want to check it out

Pages: [1]
SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk