1
General Discussion / Re: Is Anyone At All Fully Raw Animal et sans Dairy on This Forum?
« on: November 25, 2020, 12:03:32 am »
It's not about being religious or dogmatic. It is about scientific discovery and learning what the human genome and epigenome, and hence maximum genetic expression would look like which literally can only be observed under total biochemical fidelity. See Pottenger's cats. Most humans are between Pottenger's 2nd and 4th generation of degradation. And for most it would take 4-8 generations of no synthetics, all raw k2-rich animal foods, and almost nil carbs to get back to flawless. Possibly more.
Obviously people can do whatever they want. It is just common and unexceptional, uninspiring, and unilluminating. We have plenty of data for what garbage genetics look like, we have *zero* data for maximum expression aka the ideal. In other words, it would be a bigger accomplishment than going to space or visiting the deepest part of the oceans which the Chinese, at least, have already done. Savvy?
Furthermore, due to the Pottenger phenomenon, none of us can even reach the ideal in our lifetime. All we can do is lay a foundation. Most important would be producing flawless sperm and ova, to the extent our current epi/genome will allow and then raising those offspring in purity.
Also please don't bring up the supposed flaw of Pottenger's studies. That "flaw" itself actually gets filed under evidence *for* the deleterious effects of cooking and cats do *not* do just "fine" when the relevant molecules are manually reintroduced to cooked foods or vets would not be making money hand over fist on feline pathogenesis. No, we are not cats, but we get similar problems due to cooking from other nutrients ruined by cooking, such as iodine and k2.
Obviously people can do whatever they want. It is just common and unexceptional, uninspiring, and unilluminating. We have plenty of data for what garbage genetics look like, we have *zero* data for maximum expression aka the ideal. In other words, it would be a bigger accomplishment than going to space or visiting the deepest part of the oceans which the Chinese, at least, have already done. Savvy?
Furthermore, due to the Pottenger phenomenon, none of us can even reach the ideal in our lifetime. All we can do is lay a foundation. Most important would be producing flawless sperm and ova, to the extent our current epi/genome will allow and then raising those offspring in purity.
Also please don't bring up the supposed flaw of Pottenger's studies. That "flaw" itself actually gets filed under evidence *for* the deleterious effects of cooking and cats do *not* do just "fine" when the relevant molecules are manually reintroduced to cooked foods or vets would not be making money hand over fist on feline pathogenesis. No, we are not cats, but we get similar problems due to cooking from other nutrients ruined by cooking, such as iodine and k2.