>> read scurvy was caused by to much liver consumption. Was cured when sailors were given lemon/lime. So scurvy can be 
>> argued that it was a Vit A & C imbalance


Dr  KGH  (paleonu.com)  states that C is only needed in tiny quantities in a non-Carb diet.  Carbs compete to bind to the same intra-cell receptors that Ascorbic Acid does; and they do so preferentially. British Sailors of centuries past got scurvy at sea only because they were eating high-Carb rations

sorry i don't have a citation, but a very old reference which i clearly remember is:   a German bra-making company advises women to measure the  _volume_ of their breast by the water-displaced-from-bowl-into-larger-pan method.

German company says:   anything lower than 125 cc - no bra needed.

This criterion possibly includes a large fraction of women in SouthEast Asia.

I would add my own observation:  the more conservative the locale, the less likely that even a teeny-tiny chested girl is to go bra-less.  A bra is seen as a token of being an adult woman.

the best athletes are good examples of muscle performance that is easily bettered by a machine or by wild animals.

the best athletes are not good examples of  ==optimal health==

your role model depends upon your goal.....

persistence hunting is a bad use of time.

there is lots of archeological evidence that most of our ancestors were not such losers; and had no problem imagineering and organizing VERY CLEVER scenarios such as lighting fires to stampede the megafauna into running over a cliff. 

Crafting tools is an actual sign of   ==being==   a hominid.  Why would you desire to hunt without any crafted tools?!?

if you feel actual hunger more often than 24-36 hours after your last previous meal, it is a sign that you aren't getting enough animal-fat in your diet.

that stuff is connective tissue.  It isn't fat, and it isn't carbohydrate, so it only be beef protein. Your stomach acids have no trouble digesting it and passing it on to your bloodstream for use.

I myself, spit most of it out after chewing the melts-in-your-mouth fat out, as I try to restrict the amount of protein I eat.

If you have enough ambition, you can learn to trim it out of your rations, as it actually is NOT identical in appearance to true fat. It is present in the form of sheets, same as the fascia in your own mammal body.  Commercial butchers don't, simply because they are ruled by time contraints. You may not be.

Fonterra Corporation of New Zealand  (owner of the trademark "Anchor"), states in their website that they don't require their sourcing farmers to never use corn/soy  supplemental feed.

They don't have much choice.  While it is very possible for a ==beef== animal to reach market weight on a diet of grass-forage plus a ration of grass-hay....   it is not physically possible for a dairy cow to eat enough calories from grass /grass-hay  in a day to produce commercial quantities of milk.

New Zealand has a mild climate and you can easily let the cows out to pasture every day.  However, no one is able to milk a herd of cows out at the paddock in a sanitary manner....  so at some point in the day they are brought inside. This is when they receive their supplemental feed. In fact there are people who devote their careers to making the ration be =delicious= so that the cows will come-n-get-it, as you can't train a cow to think that running inside just to get attached to a milking machine is plenty of fun.....

There also exists machinery which enables ration to be presented to the herd at outdoor stands.

By the way GoodSam, there is a dairy operation in Davao del Sur, and one in Bukidnon.  None of the horrible reconstituted-then-boiled milk you are drinking in MM, can compare with real, low-heat-pasteurized fresh milk in bottles!

@Cinna

the bovines you're eating, were most likely steers.....   not cows.

sending a letter is not sufficient.   you need to confront a judge at the VERY BEGINNING of any possible proceeding to make your claim that he can't proceed for non-subject-matter jurisdiction  and/or non-personal jurisdicition.  If you don't object at the very beginning, you might be deemed to have WAIVED the right to object.

you might as well do all the lengthy research yourself.  Hardly any attorney will take  this approach.  Attornies are sworn to be Officers of the Court,  and it goes completely against their guild system to claim common-law rights.


At the very beginning of any proceeding, the judge will ask you innocuous-sounding questions which polite people are wont to answer..... "are you so-an-so"?     If you start answering these questions, you are volunteering to go under their jurisdiction.

There is no USA jurisdiction in which you can be forced to act as a witness against yourself.  Don't start answering their questions.   Object on the basis of non-jurisdiction.  The other side will be then be forced to prove that they have it.

Singapore Airlines  (and its wholly-owned subsidiary,  SilkAir)   is the world's only airline to offer zero-carb meals.

I think I've read as much KGH-thought as anyone else.  My read of his reasons for consuming that amount of carbs is:

1.  He damn well enjoys them. As in, dark chocolate.

2.  He believes that paleolithic eating is 95% about what poisons must be avoided.  In his intro to his 12 recommended steps, he outright states that the first 2, just by themselves, cover 80% of the benefit.


3. Charles would say that KGH has un-resolved dietary addictions.   I say that Charles has an un-resolved addiction to running half-marathons.

Mel,  the English-literacy rate in Singapore is higher than in the USA.