Thanks for the ideas folks. I looked into it and it looks like my response to the vaccine questionaire does go in my records. I think I might choose one of these two reasons that the questionnaire offers:
1) "I am opposed to vaccines for philosophical, ethical, or religious reasons."
But I wonder if that will be viewed as a wacko answer.
2) "I think the influenza vaccine could harm me."
But they may just tell me that it's perfectly safe. The other options are lame.
Options they didn't give me:
> Influenza vaccines don't work as well as claimed.
> According to the research, vitamin D appears to work better, and it's my antiviral of choice.
> I don't think it makes sense to inject new and poorly understood stuff into people with needles, producing unknown effects, instead of following the tried and true path of getting sufficient vitamin D.
> First do no harm: I don’t believe in injecting stuff into people, especially immune-sensitive people, when it isn’t necessary.
Some references:
Winter flu jabs evidence queried
There is not enough evidence to support the policy of immunising people against seasonal flu, an expert has claimed.
26 October 2006
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6087270.stmVaccines for preventing influenza in healthy children
January 25. 2006
The Cochrane Collaboration: Cochrane Reviews
http://www2.cochrane.org/reviews/en/ab004879.htmlClin Exp Immunol. 2009 Oct;158(1):20-5.
Vitamin D and respiratory health.
Institute of Food Research, Norwich, UK
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19737226?itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum&ordinalpos=8'Roid Rage: Vitamin D3 -- DO IT (Part II)
NOVEMBER 10, 2009
http://drbganimalpharm.blogspot.com/2009/11/roid-rage-vitamin-d3-do-it-part-ii.htmlThumb your nose at swine flu
William Davis, MD
WEDNESDAY, APRIL 29, 2009
http://heartscanblog.blogspot.com/2009/04/thumb-your-nose-at-swine-flu.html