Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - CHK91

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13
251
Hot Topics / Re: Raw Vegan vs Paleo
« on: January 04, 2011, 04:31:34 am »
We must keep in mind that to hunter gathers in the past, a successful hunt could have been a difference between life or death. This is would be very motivating. If failure was death, I definitely give it my all.

252
Hot Topics / Re: Raw Vegan vs Paleo
« on: January 04, 2011, 04:25:14 am »
Which modern humans? What do you mean by modern humans? The species of modern human can do it, I could do it, and some western peoples have done it very recently for a challenge, whilst some modern(species) humans still living as HGs still do it regularly. Of course some unhealthy person can't do it..


I don't mean the species. I was just saying that "civilized" peoples can't do this well because they haven't "trained" enough through experience.

253
Hot Topics / Re: Raw Vegan vs Paleo
« on: January 04, 2011, 04:22:02 am »
Our lifespan is higher than that of our ancestors. Our intelligence has also increased.
Our lifespan is higher because every day isn't a struggle to survive and because of emergency medical care.

Intelligence is very vague to define. If a modern human was transported to the paleolithic, the hunter-gathers would think that he or she was retarded because of a lack of survival skills and wit.

254
Hot Topics / Re: Raw Vegan vs Paleo
« on: January 04, 2011, 04:13:44 am »
Humans can even kill herbivores by running them down on an open plain, with no weapons. Humans are the most efficient runners in the animal kingdom.

Modern humans cannot do this well unfortunately. XD Such is what civilization does. I think it is easy to underestimate our ancestors, since humans today don't seem capable of doing these things.

255
Hot Topics / Re: Raw Vegan vs Paleo
« on: January 04, 2011, 04:09:42 am »
Apart from turtles and snails, humans cant outrun but other humans. Which animals can we outrun, Miles? Animals are superior to us in both stamina and speed.
The idea is not to outrun. Humans are intelligent and found ways to injure prey from distance. THEN, they chase the prey down. The injury makes chasing down much easier.

256
Omnivorous Raw Paleo Diet / Re: How much water do you drink?
« on: January 03, 2011, 12:05:01 am »
I drink whenever I feel thirsty. The only times I limit my water is before and after meals so I don't dilute my digestive enzymes and stomach acid.

257
Primal Diet / Re: Raw Unheated Honey
« on: January 02, 2011, 11:55:32 am »
Are the benefits of raw honey worth it for those that become hypoglycemic with sugar? ???

258
Hot Topics / Re: Dr. Mercola says to eat NO FISH?
« on: January 02, 2011, 08:49:46 am »
A person who is malnourished will have a body incapable of handling heavy metals. Ironically, it may be the vegans and vegetarians who are more likely for mercury toxicity than fish eaters. There are protein complexes known as metallothionein in the body that are important in eliminating mercury and other heavy metals from the body. It requires zinc, cysteine, and selenium for proper function and these nutrients would be low on low protein vegan diets without red meat. The rich selenium content in fish along with bioavailable cysteine supports this function. Just make sure you eat red meat too. :)

I'm wary of Mercola at times because he always wants to sell something to you.

259
General Discussion / Re: The Raw Paleo Blues
« on: January 02, 2011, 07:53:39 am »
An organism's genetic makeup does not change from eating GM foods. It could have unforeseen consequences, but genetic makeup is fixed. Horizontal gene transfer is a more common occurrence between bacteria, fungi, and plants. Animals are not going to gain any new genes from these organisms. Super diseases are a result of antibiotic abuse, and yes gene exchange occurs commonly among microorganisms. These new genes simply make the organism more resistant to the antibiotics that have been made. It doesn't make them any more deadly than if one refused any treatment. Keep your immune system powerful and hope for the best on this one  :D.

If the GM trees limp, that means that natural selection will weed them out and they will never have a foothold in the wild. The problem arises when GM organisms have an incredible ability to complete with the natural population.

Monsanto is definitely an evil corporation, but more people are becoming aware of their madness every day. Even if I don't agree with Whole Foods 100%, we NEED these type of companies to raise awareness since they are big enough to have influence and oppose GMOs.

Don't fall into feelings of futility. It can make you crazy. It certainly made me for a while. :)

260
Off Topic / Re: Jericho Sunfire Transitioning to Breatharian
« on: January 02, 2011, 06:01:44 am »
True but eating raw meat sounded pretty silly to me initially.  ;D

Which is why I probably shouldn't tell people about what I do now.  ;)

261
Hot Topics / Re: Heil Tofu.
« on: January 02, 2011, 05:44:49 am »
If only I can go back in time and show him how to live paleo, just imagine how wonderful the world would be now  ;D

And help him actually get accepted into art school. Imagine how the world would be if he had become an artist instead. :P

262
General Discussion / Re: Senate Bill 510
« on: January 02, 2011, 05:22:45 am »

263
Off Topic / Re: Jericho Sunfire Transitioning to Breatharian
« on: January 02, 2011, 04:16:04 am »
During my health seeking journey, I have become more open-minded about many things. However, this just sounds silly.

I am a bit wary of so called "gurus". There are so many "experts" out there that claim they know the way, and it is very confusing to figure out who is right and who is wrong.

I choose the information from "gurus" whether that be Sally Fallon, Joe Mercola, or Aajonus and practice what works the best for me.

264
General Discussion / Re: Cod Liver or Krill oil gets me fatigue.
« on: January 02, 2011, 04:09:25 am »
Interesting, I have noticed that I did feel a little "off" whenever I took a teaspoon of flaxseed oil. It's only ALA, but it does make me suspicious about isolated oils.


265
General Discussion / Re: The Raw Paleo Blues
« on: January 02, 2011, 03:47:19 am »
don't you worry about that.  there is way plenty of clean animals for both raw and cooked meat eaters.
regular Joes are pretty happy with supermarket meat.  don't let this one keep you awake at night.

Exactly. Most people are repulsed by what we do. Supply will likely never be an issue.

266
General Discussion / Re: The Raw Paleo Blues
« on: January 02, 2011, 03:04:58 am »
Corporate greed and humanity's continued belief that it can master and control nature does piss me off. However, I don't think it is all bad news. People are becoming more aware of these issues every day. First of all I doubt grass fed farms will be shut down. The worst that could happen is that business becomes more difficult. Also, respectable ranchers can make sure that the herd is not contaminated with GM DNA. The thing I am more concerned about is GMO seafood since fish escaping into the wild and polluting the gene pool is a scary possibility. They say all the fish are sterile but I'm still not comfortable with the idea even if the operations are inland. It just takes one mistake... Just one.

267
Off Topic / Re: 5 movies list
« on: January 02, 2011, 02:41:32 am »
That clip reminds me of the hype around antioxidants. I have seen bars containing chocolate exclaiming that it is a source of antioxidants.

Person 1: "Our chocolate bar has what humans need. It's has antioxidants."

Person 2: "Just what are antioxidants?!"

Person 1: "It's.... It's what humans need..."

Person 3: "It has antioxidants!"




268
General Discussion / Re: Senate Bill 510
« on: January 02, 2011, 02:16:24 am »
I am glad that both of my state's senators voted against this.

The mood here is very anti-government.

269
Hot Topics / Re: Heil Tofu.
« on: January 01, 2011, 11:39:25 am »
Lol, just hope I. Newkirk doesn't ever become prime minister.

270
Off Topic / Re: Bates Method?
« on: January 01, 2011, 07:04:52 am »
Nope. It's been warmer this year, and we haven't even come close to getting any snow.

271
Off Topic / Re: Would you eat seafood from the Gulf of Mexico now?
« on: January 01, 2011, 05:29:11 am »
You didn't. I knew you were just making a point.  ;)

I'm pretty sure everyone on this forum is in favor of conservation and taking only what we need and leaving what we don't need.

Be Leavers and not Takers

272
Off Topic / Re: Bates Method?
« on: January 01, 2011, 05:22:48 am »
I think I can do it midday now since it's winter. It's about 2 or 3 at this time of year in north Texas.

273
Off Topic / Re: Would you eat seafood from the Gulf of Mexico now?
« on: January 01, 2011, 04:43:40 am »
It's interesting, we all whinge about environmental disasters, but I haven't noticed the widespread return of people travelling around on asses in Canada or the US.  ;D

I believe we are all hypocritical to some degree. :P

274
Off Topic / Re: Bates Method?
« on: January 01, 2011, 03:07:33 am »
Sungazing is nothing short of amazing. It is a bit time consuming but essentially in the first and last hour of the day (winter the envelope is larger because the sun is lower) you look directly at the sun. First day for 10 seconds and then every day you add 10 seconds. Continue till you get to 45 minutes. That takes about 9 months if you have good weather.

Is it absolutely necessary that it be during dawn and dusk?

275
Off Topic / Re: Would you eat seafood from the Gulf of Mexico now?
« on: January 01, 2011, 02:54:55 am »
Basically we are fishing the oceans to the point where fish are going the way of the dodo bird. That is a fact. Cod are very scarce around Newfoundland where it was a cornucopia of them in the past. However what are we supposed to do? Stop eating?

Then we should try to eat fish that aren't so few in number. I think we should give time for some species to recover and start eating them again when numbers are plentiful. Extinction would be bad...

Anyways, I saw some figures that gave me some perspective. There is an estimated 6.43 X 10^17 gallons of water in the gulf. About 206,000,000 or 2.06 X 10^8 gallons of oil were spilled. In terms of percentage of the gulf it would be 3.2 X 10^-8% or .000000032%. It's probably less than that now since bacteria have been working on it for a long time. Since the gulf is usually very warm, the bacteria would probably work faster than it did for the Exxon Valdez spill. Some have expressed concern that the oil is accumulating on the seabed as if it was a bad thing, but won't it eventually get buried back to where it originally was? It is very likely that there are pollutants in much greater concentration at fish farms.

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13
SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk