Omnivorous Raw Paleo Diet / Re: Veggies over fruits?
« on: March 13, 2011, 10:42:29 pm »Coconut is mostly saturated fat
fun fact - 100% chocolate contains more saturated fat than lard ...
/* * Patch for filter_var() */ if(!function_exists('filter_var')){ define('FILTER_VALIDATE_IP', 'ip'); define('FILTER_FLAG_IPV4', 'ipv4'); define('FILTER_FLAG_IPV6', 'ipv6'); define('FILTER_VALIDATE_EMAIL', 'email'); define('FILTER_FLAG_EMAIL_UNICODE', 'unicode'); function filter_var($variable, $filter, $option = false){ if($filter == 'ip'){ if($option == 'ipv4'){ if(preg_match("/(\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3})/", $variable, $matches)){ $variable = $matches[1]; return $variable; } } if($option == 'ipv6'){ if(preg_match("/\s*(([:.]{0,7}[0-9a-fA-F]{0,4}){1,8})\s*/", $variable, $matches)){ $variable = $matches[1]; return $variable; } } } if($filter == 'email'){ if($option == 'unicode' || $option == false){ if(preg_match("/\s*(\S*@\S*\.\S*)\s*/", $variable, $matches)){ $variable = $matches[1]; return $variable; } } } } }
Visit our website: www.rawpaleodiet.com
Join our Yahoo Group: RawPaleoDiet
RSS Feed Latest 50 Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Coconut is mostly saturated fat
My father was a trained biologist that actualy studied parisites in shell fish; there are numbers of differnt ameombas and such that can live symbioticaly with other life forms without causing any harm. My father thought I was crazy for eatting raw clams and oysters, but as you will learn here, raw foods even if they contain a few ameobas are generaly without any harmfull effects. The food poisoning issues with shell fish are usualy linked to cooked foods.Every now and then someone here will get a reaction to raw shellfish, but it isn't serious and resolves after a couple of days of diarrhea. Once your digestive system becomes fully adapted to raw paleo then you can eat about anything without worry.
http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=pHINwjeuF9gC&pg=PA156&lpg=PA156&dq=DHA+in+ruminant+fat&source=bl&ots=_qTcTbaDfh&sig=cqNlpyarrxI32C10T25q63NydaA&hl=en&ei=uqR7TdeSA5KHhQeuma3zBg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CBYQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=DHA%20in%20ruminant%20fat&f=false
On a personal note, I have tried flax oil and even ate some soaked chia seeds, and had terrible experiences with decline in health and mental function. (Chia and flax are not fit for human consumption, based on my own experience) Consider yourself warned, if you are one of the poor fools who still believe otherwise.
On an other personal note, I ate about a pint of raw oysters last night and feel such foods have helped me reached a new peak of metal acuity. Its amazing how just a few servings of raw sea food a week can improve ones thinking. This is more than just my imagination, before this diet I had sever decline in mental functioning and clarity of thought, as well as a plethora of physical health issues, that kept me from even being able to be happy. Now I have found a happiness that I don't think was possible before, which is a good sign that I am doing something right. Not only My own happiness, but I have applied what I have learned to raising my children and so far the results are amazing.
Wrong again. Carnivores tend to be more intelligent than herbivores, so clearly diet is an important factor as regards intelligence.
How did you store them? Most chicken is probably lower quality and not good for fermenting.
the biggest rise in apeman brain-size in the Palaeolithic era occurred in tandem with a massive increase in meat-consumption by apemen.
Err, ahem, primates have opposable thumbs like gorillas. That happened well before hominid brains got bigger.
You're not being too bright. The fact is that those studies showed that brain-size decreased by 8 percent once we switched from the Palaeolithic era to the Neolithic era. The only major change around that time was a major reduction of animal food in the human diet and a corresponding consumption of grains, dairy and legumes. Given that the Eskimoes have the largest brain-sizes and were until recently eating all-animal food diets(well, 96 to 99 percent at least), that supports the notion that it was the eating of meat that made human brains bigger and that a reduction in meat-consumption led to a smaller brain-size.
Eating more meat didn't make Homo brains bigger, it allowed Homo brains to become bigger.
I think there is more to it than more meat means bigger brain, I mean lions don't have huge brains. But I also think there is some truth to it, I just haven't unravelled it yet. I think TD is correct though that it takes generations for degeneration to set it. Omega-3s, for instance, are concentrated in sperm and mother's milk. But each generation that consumes an omega-3 deficient diet leaves less for the next generation.
It's already proven by studies that the human brain decreased in size by 8 percent since the Neolithic due to a reduction in animal food consumption.
the argument goes that by eating more meat/fish our brains were able to evolve to their present large size. I am not saying this like it is gospel, don't misinterpret me, I am just wondering if anyone else has heard this and maybe someone could point me to the source.
I thought that digestion began in the mouth, which means that chewing leads to better digestion due to the action of mastication (increased surface area of the food) as well as chemical breakdown from the food being bathed in saliva.
Blending food means that a machine is doing the mastication part and the food can be consumed quickly, so there is less saliva mingling with the food. Of course, you could hold the blended food in your mouth and let the saliva flow for several seconds before swallowing, to allow the chemicals to go to work on the pre-masticated food. What are your thoughts on this?
May I ask for the source of your estimate of 100 grams of fiber a day for historic paleolithic humans?
Whole fruits and veggies have the correct amount of fiber for their digestion
you only have to worry about fiber if you are eating processed foods.
But on the whole fiber is unimportant when eating paleo.
Okay, meat has a lot of protein in it. What was your point?
You are accusing me of saying something I never said (re "knowing").
I am being Socratic to show how absurd the whole smoothie/juicing thing is."
you didn't answer any of the questions I posed.
If you think smoothies have merit, then maybe you can convince me with reason/logic/evidence.
Like I said, I was just poking fun, not trying to insult or offend anyone. If I did I apologize.
Smoothies with berries and raw eggs are a good breakfast / pre workout shake nothing special about it just taste and nutrients unless you are on a 1 meal a day diet or something.
+ they digest super fast