Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - eveheart

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 ... 88
151
"Instincto" seems to be a trigger word for you meaning CARBS.

I don't know what your comment means.

Instincto refers to instinctotherapie, which means letting the taste and smell of unprocessed foods guide you to the foods that your body needs in the moment. It's a great way to eat. However, inflammation in the body can mimic a normal desire for foods that are inflammatory to an individual. If the inflaming foods are removed, instincto works perfectly.

If a person feels badly after eating a certain food, that food should be avoided, even if taste and smell are appealing. Many people react that way to carbs, and that has nothing to do with trigger words, whatever those are. 

152
Note I said listen to "some" ... instincts... like taste.
Sure there is that logic you mention.
There is a balance somewhere.
For example, he has no attraction to eggs, but views eggs as a logical choice... so at least go find eggs that TASTE good.
If he eats beef... go and find beef that TASTES good.
If he eats fish... go and find fish that TASTES good.

It's logical to start somewhere and make adjustments later. He is starting from two givens: his macro-nutrient balance plus food availability. His favorite "tastes" will develop later, IF he finds that taste is important. OR, he might think more along the lines of "if I can get through the day without a carb crash, taste doesn't matter at all." I do that often.

You want him to anticipate all future adjustments before he starts; there is NO logic in that. I remember when our local slaughterhouse was closed in a food-quality scandal, and I couldn't find good beef fat. I lived on pasteurized, grass fed butter for a few weeks and ate way too much protein while I scrambled to find other good animal-fat sources.

He is posting in the right topic. Perhaps he is looking for supportive advice within the realm of a low-carb approach. I started out with a generally raw approach, which cut out carbs from grains and legumes and experienced relief from carb cravings. Then, as I broadened my paleo food choices to some of the fruits and nuts mentioned by instincto eaters, I triggered binge-eating all over again. It is possible to eat instincto within low-carb, but you can't just wolf down a banana because of its attractive aroma, because carb-cravings will completely mask signals of satiety. There is no way to tell another person what will work for that person until he tries it. I eat neither eggs nor ground beef, but I can support his efforts intelligently.

153
Listen to some instincto and eat stuff you enjoy.

Why would panacea ignore his carb-craving symptom, which is the early-warning sign of inflammation that leads to adult-onset diabetes? What kind of "enjoyment" do you imagine one gets from intense carb-cravings, where you know that you just ate so that your stomach is full, but you are still ravenously hungry?

154
Why does eating 24 or 33 yolks a day seem so crazy?

I wouldn't call it "so crazy." It's a little bit quirky from the "usual" style of egg eating offered in restaurants and cookbooks, but it's not like you are taking vows to eat two dozen egg yolks per day until you die. I would consider your two-day cycle to be a fact-finding mission. I've had some periods like that myself, most recently when I was troubleshooting a symptom that was bothering me.

Variety seems to be a matter of personal preference and availability. I would never consider procuring foods from afar (such as tubers from Africa or nuts from Asia), yet there is nothing really wrong with eating foods from other regions.

I don't know what your "before" carb level looks like, but many people like to dive into ketosis with a week or two (or six) of eating the way you have planned. When you actually start consuming what you planned to eat, you might get sick of it, you might not. I don't eat eggs so much and I can't get beef that I like, so I am living on lamb and fish and enjoying it to the fullest. Nowadays, I get lamb heart, liver, kidneys, and other parts from a halal market in my area. I asked about the ranch and checked it out, so it is grassfed and not supplemented with lamb chow. A quick check of the ranch is reassuring for me.

I make a distinction between authentic and therapeutic paleo. If I were a real cavewoman, I would probably never have gotten sick in the first place -or- I would already be dead. As sick as I was, I've done a great job with part-paleo eating and part engineered eating. I think you are on the right track and your direction sounds reasonable from the symptom you described.

155
One thing I'm concerned about is the level of selenium

Selenium supplements typically have 200mcg per capsule, so your calculated levels aren't way high. Also, it might be that a "safe level" is different in real food vs supplements.

156
I've been a slave to carbs my whole life....

That describes me, too. Now, I don't shun carbs in the form of non-starchy vegetables, but my daily carb intake is about 25g. This has been a great way to keep my binge-eating urges away completely. I've gone through a few variations and permutations in my variety and carb levels over the years, but the one constant has been keeping low-carb for ketosis.

As far as the lack of variety and general weirdness of eating those many egg yolks, I remember I over-quantified a lot at first until I got the hang of what I was doing. It's not bad to start with your calculations the way you have them set up now and branch out with small changes along the way when you feel like it.

157
Is your carb goal of "below 30g per day" based on your past ketogenic observations, or someone else's recommendation? If this is based on something you read, then I suggest finding your own level. For some, 30g may be too low; for others, 30g would be too high. Also, timing of carb intake (spread out, not all at once) might be considered, based on your experience.

Also, how do you do with such a narrow choice of food? Some people are fine with it, but if you find yourself fighting the restrictions, be more flexible. I'd go crazy with just three foods, but then again, I don't eat a ton of variety, either. I like to adjust variety by season, sort of.

158
Unfortunately   ;) , at the current moment, some of the  women "I am hanging out with " "right now ", are over 80, and they are all weirdly obsessed with the late-WW2 notions of " let's cut back, give up, restrict ourselves etc.",  which they developed, as formerly successful routines,  as teens or pre-puberty girls  in WW2. One is now on the  very verge of becoming permanently cripped and incontinent due to inadequate regular  exercise, the other will eventually  give up due to ongoing, increasing osteoporosis. What I cannot understand is my complete inability to convert people to RVAF diets, regardless of their age. It is a bit sad really.

Imagine that! an 80-year old woman who is set in her ways!

There's a favorite saying of mine: "You can either be a shining example or a dire warning." Both kinds of people exist. You complete inability to convert people to RVAF might have everything to do with your audience. Why would you try to convert someone with a 70-year track record of personal neglect. You gotta pretty much walk on water to perform such a miracle because it's equivalent to raising the dead.

If you insist on currying the favor of octogenarians, find some at a gym if you want someone interested in RVAF.

(Haha! I know those old ladies are your great-aunts or something plausible. That generation was different.)

159
There is, of course, nothing wrong with women gaining muscle-mass. I recall a study, I forget where, wherein men in their 70s and 80s were forced to lift weights and train like they did when they were 40. They experienced similiar muscle-mass gain in the end to what they had in their 40s and improved overall. The point being that increased aging has been linked to reduced muscle-mass in the elderly. Plus, reduced muscle-mass can lead to an increased chance of falling in the elderly etc.

Exactly! Plus, a strong senior can "do" things like stand up from the seated position, get up from the floor (after playing with grandchildren), carry their own groceries, and do their own home repairs. The exercise necessary to maintain lifelong fitness is not extreme. I don't think I do anything more vigorous than I did working on a farm, but that was a lot of endurance plus heavy lifting.

Fitness "gurus" have make the same "point" that Brando is making forever! It's just marketing! My great-grandmother was a yoga practitioner. My grandmother walked miles every day, including up and down 6 flights of stairs to her apartment. My mother swam a few miles at a time a few times per week. Of all the women I know, nobody considers themselves fearful of having strong muscles. Some women are fearful of breaking their fingernails (even when they can glue them back on) and sweating (because their face paint will run), but these women, while vociferous, are not representative of normal women. Which women are you hanging out with, TD?

160
Hmmm... nice.  Can you share your heavy resistance regimen during your young fertile times?  May be useful for my daughters who are fast growing up.


Sometimes I can't believe the differences in our cultures, GS. From my perspective, your daughters should figure out what they like doing for themselves. If they like exercising in gyms, they'll learn that. There is no special "regimen" - one just uses the equipment at hand, usually some free weights, some machines, and one tries to exercise every muscle in a nice, balanced way. I'm sure gyms in the Philippines are like the ones in the U.S. I rode a bicycle and did yoga, which your daughters can also do if they want. I'd want them to know that they don't have to do anything "for" their fertility. It's there because they are made that way. And, those few years of fertility are nothing when compared to the years and years of childrearing. And, then comes the endless decades of grandparenthood, when everything makes you laugh. Tell your daughters to learn how to laugh often and deeply.

161
I've always used heavy resistance at the gym going back to about the 1970s. It didn't affect my fertility or my ability to carry a pregnancy. It probably (N=1) improved my labors. Whatever "bulk" I carry makes me move gracefully, which looks as good on women as it does on men. When I was ill, my strength worked to my advantage during recovery.

The interesting thing about this article, to me, is the implication that women worry about strength training. This "guru" Brando apparently specializes in meeting and training women with body issues, but that does not give him the right to generalize about women who are normal. He is marketing his services by appealing to the fears of the ultra-girly fringe. How does this make him newsworthy?

162
Hot Topics / Re: Bacterial influence on saturated and unsaturated fat
« on: April 23, 2016, 10:40:01 am »
I'm not too science-y, but are you talking about something similar to the way kefir grains change milk fat? Also, how are you fermenting the walnuts and coconuts, with a starter probiotic, in fermenting veggies, or ???

163
How long has this nameless symptom continued to plague you? I'm thinking that, if you went from tons of sugar to a rather low carb intake (let's say under 100 g/day overall), you'd possibly feel an effect from that - I think they call it the Atkins flu. It can be a vague feeling or something more symptomatic, but it should go away in a few days.

Another possibility: If you jumped into a bit of fruit-eating, you might be loosening up your bowels a bit, but not enough to have diarrhea outright.

Also, don't overlook the fact that coincidences happen, and it may be nothing at all related to cutting out sugar.

164
General Discussion / Re: Raw placenta story
« on: April 09, 2016, 12:25:56 am »
Well, what on Earth do you expect?

What difference would it make if you knew my expectations? nevertheless, thanks for asking.

165
General Discussion / Re: Raw placenta story
« on: April 08, 2016, 10:49:49 pm »
It seems history does indeed repeat itself all the time, and few ever learn anything from it!

From my perspective, it seems The Daily Mail repeats history, calls it new, and attracts gullible readers. It's their marketing strategy, and you fell for it.

166
General Discussion / Re: Raw placenta story
« on: April 08, 2016, 06:05:34 am »
Not a "new" phenomenon! I learned about this when I was having children in the 70s and 80s, and it was not "new" then, either. I think it is an ancient tradition.

167
Off Topic / Re: New anti-gluten phenomenon
« on: April 05, 2016, 10:35:39 pm »
Just waking up? This is another case of recent-history amnesia in the healthy-eating community. Just as Atkins conveniently forgot about Banting et al., this scientist cannot remember J. I. Rodale, who built his organic-farming publishing empire, in part, on his monthly series "Don't Eat Wheat!" I was still in my teens when I read those issues of Prevention magazine, and I haven't read anything new on the subject since.

There are those who claim that problems with wheat come from failure to ferment the dough (as in a natural sourdough). However, as one who has been wheat-free for some forty years, it's hard for me to understand why someone would go out of their way to make wheat edible when it is so easily avoided.

168
Omnivorous Raw Paleo Diet / Re: Difficulty eating raw steak
« on: March 28, 2016, 11:34:09 am »
I never buy "steak" because those cuts are too expensive. If I want beef with a large area of muscle between the other connective tissues, I get a roast from the rump region, such as London broil, eye of round, etc. These are usually the cheapest cuts, too, often costing less per pound than ground beef. Uncooked, these muscles are tender enough to chew easily. They only toughen up when cooked.

169
I eat organic, free range, heavily grain-fed chicken all the time.

If the chickens are raised on the range, where do the grains come from? Free range chickens eat the pickings from the pasture, like worms, maggots, grubs. Is their "range" some kind of ever-bearing cornfield?

170
Primal Diet / Re: Raw cheese varieties, brands, sources, reviews
« on: March 21, 2016, 09:21:29 pm »
Salt in fermented foods serves as a control for the range of bacteria, not as a flavoring. I don't know why you said, "The author is a huge fan of salt...," because you sound as if salt were some sort of fad. In cheesemaking, as well as in breadmaking, beer- and wine-making, and the fermentation of meats and vegetables, it is desirable to control yeasts and bacteria by adjusting temperature, salinity, light, oxygen, and time. The resulting ferment is awesome tasting when you get the variables within certain ranges. However, the taste can go the other way if you don't have the right controls. Why not learn how to make a good cheese before you experiment with the variables?

171
Primal Diet / Re: Raw cheese varieties, brands, sources, reviews
« on: March 20, 2016, 11:58:15 pm »
Well then, perhaps you have to research further. Putting "natural cheesemaking" in a search engine gets half a million results, such as this one: http://www.amazon.com/The-Art-Natural-Cheesemaking-Non-Industrial/dp/1603585788. The book is The Art of Natural Cheesemaking: Using Traditional, Non-Industrial Methods and Raw Ingredients to Make the World's Best Cheeses by David Asher.

172
Primal Diet / Re: Raw cheese varieties, brands, sources, reviews
« on: March 19, 2016, 11:23:32 pm »
It would also be interesting to learn the full process for extracting rennet...

There are quite a few Youtube videos about extracting rennet the natural way, plus about a bazillion other cheesemaking videos.

173
Primal Diet / Re: Raw salt-free olives
« on: March 19, 2016, 11:18:38 pm »

174
I don't dry age fish at all. It doesn't taste right to me when I age it in my fridge. I do eat Korean dried anchovies as a yummy snack.

My 18 cu.ft. refrigerator has the lower shelves and crisper bins removed. I keep fermented stuff and such on the top shelf and the meat hangs from the rack to the floor. My hanging-weight capacity is roughly 45 - 60 pounds. One of my main goals is to beat the high cost of good meat by going to the ranch and getting a whole animal or a large cut, so I set myself up to be able to store the meat. I don't like the texture of frozen-then-thawed meat.

175
Instincto / Anopsology / Re: Eat what when? (especially meat)
« on: March 07, 2016, 05:03:15 am »
The natural hygiene movement of the 1800s probably has some merit. The basis of correct food combining is the way different macronutrients get digested and absorbed along the digestive tract. Separating meat from fruit, for example, is done because meat digests in the acidic stomach, while the simple sugars in fruits don't need an acid treatment, and starches start digestion with saliva in the mouth. I've heard many people claim that food combining is good remedy for indigestion.

I don't combine foods much for reasons of practicality - if I am chowing down on a nice hunk of meat, I'm not about to find something else to go with it unless I'm following social eating rules invented at the king's table. But the king could order all his serfs to tote in a variety of food, whereas my ancestors probably ate what was around at the moment.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 ... 88
SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk