Marrow is a good source, IMO. Current brain/human evolution theory is that humans' brains got larger as a result of eating lots of dha-richbrains and marrow(ie both raw) from scavenged animals killed by other predators such as lions. It's all to do with the expensive tissue hypothesis.

Well, there's fluoride-free toothpaste. Baking soda is also used by some. Others use soap(not too tasty!), floss their teeth etc.

When cleaning teeth, I use a mouthwash full of chemicals as well as fluroide-free toothpaste. Not in line with raw principles, admittedly, but we all have to compromise in certain areas.

I'd just like to address a few points. First of all , the primary reason why the Internet got going in the first place  was because of all the porn sites that were there from the beginning|(indeed, at one point, porn consisted of something like 80-90%+  of the Internet). So porn actually helped the Internet grow, regardless of what one's personal view is of porn.

Secondly, the whole business of child porn is hopelessly overblown. Judging from media reports, one finds that almost all such websites feature made-up/photoshopped fake pictures of children being abused. The way I see it, such websites allow people with unusual tendencies to get rid of them/sublimate them  in a way that doesn't harm others. I certainly don't think that someone should be prosecuted, therefore, for merely watching such images online, as they are not directly harming anyone in any way.

By the way, there was 1 case sometime in the 80s, I think, where an American citizen from Wisconsin or some similiar neighbouring State exploited the fact that there was no local State law against Bestiality (or marrying animals?), so was able to (legally) marry his horse. Of course, he got a lot of hate-mail from the public, who felt that he was making a mockery of the USA, but he got away with it.

Here's an article from the Daily Telegraph about D'Adamo's new book and his new interpretation of his dodgy blood-type diet:-

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/3917177/Revealed-the-diet-secrets-to-help-you-fit-into-your-genes.html

W. Palm Beach/Lake Worth, FL are fortunate to welcome gifted HEALTH and

Nutritional Practitioner, AAJONUS VONDERPLANITZ, Ph.D.NUTRITION

"I attended Aajonus' lectures/workshops every year for 7 years and I

learn so much more each time. That's because as I practice the diet, I

understand more of what Aajonus told us in the workshop. As I understand

more, I learn more. I get more in control of my life every year because

<>Aajonus gives me the opportunity with his yearly workshops."  -  John Richter - 38


BRING A TAPE RECORDER* AND JOIN AAJONUS FOR A MOST FASCINATING LECTURE

AND WORKSHOP AS HE DISTINGUISHES NUTRITIONAL FACT FROM COMMONLY

BELIEVED NUTRITIONAL FICTION. 


FREE LECTURE:  SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 14,2009, NOON-1 PM

*For reservations and directions, call Isolde at 561-798-4536.


WORKSHOP:  SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 2009,  1:15 PM-7 PM - $85

At the lsat segment of workshop, Aajonus will conduct Mini-Consults.  A Mini-Consult

includes glandular analyses and specific food recommendations to improve health.

The cost of a Mini-Consult is an additional $30.  For reservations, call Isolde at 561-798-4536.


LOCATION for Lecture and Workshop: 


FIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH

OF LAKE WORTH

1415 NORTH K ST.

LAKE WORTH

 

DIRECTIONS: 

95 TO 10 AVE NORTH GO EAST & MAKE LEFT AT DIXIE HWY WHICH IS ALSO US 1.

TURN RIGHT ONTO 13 AVE NORTH, GO TWO BLOCKS & MAKE LEFT ONTO J TERRACE.

YOU ENTER THE PARKING LOT OF THE CHURCH  FROM J TERRACE NO NEED TO GO TO K ST.


__________

INDIVIDUAL CONSULTS:  Friday and Sunday FEBRUARY 13 and 15.
 

An Individual Consult requires approximately 70 minutes and costs $375.  The

consult includes iridology, glandular analyses and very detailed, personalized

food recommendations.  The iris is connected to every organ and tissue in the

body by way of the brain and the nervous system.  Iridology is a fascinating

analytical tool that can reveal conditions in the deepest areas of the body.

Reading Aajonus’ book, We Want to Live, is a pre-requisite for an Individual

Consult. The book can be purchased for $29.95 + S&H by calling 1.800.247.6553.

For appointments and directions, call Isolde at 561-798-4536.

Follow-up consult requires approximately 50 minutes and costs $300.

Only cash or checks accepted.


LOCATION for Consults will be set within 2 weeks of scheduled consults and you
will be notified.

 
 




 

I am a big Blake's Seven Fan! And that was less corny than STOS? How can you put down the special effects in STOS? Compared to B7?

And I liked Babylon 5 in the beginning with Jeffery Sinclair. I did watch other seasons but missed him a lot.

I just turned 52, so I suppose that says something. Now go play in the meat market little one 

The dialogue in Blakes' 7 was outstanding far better than Star Trek's corny dialogue and tedious message of hope. Granted, the special effects of B7 were appalling, but that was because of the prejudice that British TV producers have against science fiction.

Even though Star Trek:TOS's effects were better than B7, they were bad enough that Saturday Night Live featured a Star Trek spoof mocking the bad special effects of that series.

Look, there are 1000s of scientific studies done on AGEs, with several focusing on how the amounts of toxic AGEs in the body are directly related to conditions such as type 2 diabetes. Just google for such, they're all over the place. So that link between AGEs and ill-health is proven. Like I said, though, it's all a matter of degree, with less AGEs consumed being less worse than lots of AGEs consumed.

As regards the comment re AGEs in soups/broths, that's meaningless as peoples' diets nowadays include a vast range of foods, not just broths/soups, and I doubt that even hunter-gatherer tribes soley ate broths and soups for their cooked-foods - indeed, they ate plenty of
meats cooked without water on spits.

As regards the raw/cooked issue, I made a good point, there. Very few people mix cooked and raw at the same meal, nowadays. The average restaurant meal will  feature cooked meat and cooked veg, with a dessert involving pasteurised dairy or some such. Only rarely will people nowadays include a bit of raw fruit or raw veg at the same meal.

Re that list, I'm a little suspicious of the figures, as they don't seem that high in other lists. But, yes, I grant that raw foods from animals raised on unhealthy, AGE-rich diets are also harmful. Mind you, this is part of rawpalaeo POV, anyway. I think I addressed this point, later on in that article, but I'll add an addendum to that comment, at some stage.

Re Weston-Price:- unfortunately, most of Weston-Price's findings have been contradicted by many other anthropologists. I was not happy to find out, for example, that the Maori were decidedly NOT super-healthy, despite Price's claims, given evidence of skeletal remains.

As regards the whole cholestrol/saturated fats issue, it's been pointed out by various sources that the reason for all those studies condemning saturated fats/cholesterol/animal foods, is really only because they're focusing on cooked animal foods  and are therefore not taking the levels of toxins in such cooked-foods into account, such as AGEs. Here's a relevant excerpt from the saturated fat wikipedia page:-

"Another confounding issue may be the formation of exogenous (outside the body) advanced glycation endproducts (AGEs) and oxidation products generated during cooking, which it appears some of the studies have not controlled for. It has been suggested that, "given the prominence of this type of food in the human diet, the deleterious effects of high-(saturated)fat foods may be in part due to the high content in glycotoxins, above and beyond those due to oxidized fatty acid derivatives." The glycotoxins, as he called them, are more commonly called AGEs"

One could argue that eating foods very low in AGEs, such as always eating grassfed meats, cooked as little as possible, making sure to cook only in water etc. etc.,  might reduce the burden of toxins in the body to so-called "manageable" levels. But to suggest something like that one would have to come up with plenty of scientific studies showing that such toxins are indeed tolerated at such low levels. In practice, because even the diets of hunter-gatherer tribes will include some AGE-rich foods, it is highly unlikely that anyone on a cooked-diet could ever realistically reduce the amounts of AGEs in their diet to low enough levels.

It seems that the singer Ethel Merman's favourite food was raw meat:-

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/books/non_fictionreviews/3669946/Ethel-Merman-Champagne-and-raw-meat.html

There are photos of Barry Groves online, he seems much the same as anyone else his age, IMO.

First of all, the notions re aquatic ape theory or the shoreline theory are considered extremely fringe, with most scientists dismissing the theory given the lack of evidence and faulty points. Here's a page criticising the more basic faults in the aquatic ape theory:-

http://www.aquaticape.org/

and this one:-
http://www.aquaticape.org/aahbook.html


The other problem is that there's plenty of evidence of wild-game being slaughtered in the Palaeolithic such as the famous bones of horses at the bottom of certain cliffs in France, not forgetting the images of wild aurochs and other large herbivores on the cave walls.  It  is extremely unlikely that they would eat fish in any serious amounts  if they didn't depict them on the cave-walls.

I've just read an article in the Daily Telegraph where some idiot UK government Minister is stating that he's about to go ahead with setting age-restrictions on viewing some websites, with some censorship of websites involved as well. I can just see where this is going:- no doubt, websites like our forum will be viewed as "dangerous" and get censored.

Not laughable at all - just look at any online sources re egyptia ill-health and you'll see what I mean. The fools at the WAPF such as Sally Fallon would have us all believe that dairy is healthy to consume as long as it's raw  or that grains are OK to eat as long as they're fermented  or that cooked meats are fine as long as they're boiled but the example of the Ancient Egyptians (and many ohter Neolithic-era peoples) kind of debunks such absurd claims.