Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - TylerDurden

Pages: 1 ... 598 599 600 601 602 [603] 604 605 606 607 608 ... 612
15051
General Discussion / MOVED: Health Food Junkie
« on: August 06, 2008, 09:17:06 pm »

15052
Hot Topics / Re: Health Food Junkie
« on: August 06, 2008, 09:16:24 pm »
The beyondveg.com site, cited above,  is  ridiculously biased in its anti-raw ideology, making numerous false assumptions(eg:- that raw-foodists are Raw Vegans/Fruitarians or that Raw-Foodists are only interested in diet-ideology(actually, most such people come to these diets because no other diet has worked for them so well re improving their health).


This topic should be moved to the "Hot Topics" section, as it's of an anti-raw theme, IMO. (I'll see about doing that right now).

15053
General Discussion / Re: New Diet; that works!
« on: August 06, 2008, 09:04:41 pm »
You know, it might be an idea to have a whole forum devoted to jokes/humour, sometime in the future.

15054
General Discussion / Re: Transition.
« on: August 06, 2008, 09:01:00 pm »
Here are some Testimonials from the rawpaleo.com website:-

Raw Paleo Diet Testimonials

There are various Raw-Animal-Food diet testimonials as well on the various livefood and rawpaleodiet yahoo groups if you go through the whole archives. Also, Googling can reveal testimonials for the Primal Diet, here and there.

15055
General Discussion / Re: Raw meat and poo
« on: August 06, 2008, 08:56:37 pm »
The one thing that neither Charles nor Stefansson seem to have noticed, other than the raw-meat-eating aspect  is that the Inuit also ate plenty of organ-meats(according to numerous sources such as  Weston-Price etc.)  but also they ate from a wide variety of animals - whether caribou, elk etc.  for land-mammals or various different seal, fish or whale species for seacoast-dwelling Eskimos. Does Charles just eat cooked beef 95%+ of the time, like Lex, or does he eat other meats like mutton, goat etc.?

15056
Off Topic / Re: A poem
« on: August 06, 2008, 08:48:55 pm »
This should really be put in the Off-Topic section, IMO. Of course, as the forum grows, we can start adding unique forums for poetry/literature etc.

15057
General Discussion / Re: Mixing Acidic and Alkaline Foods
« on: August 06, 2008, 08:40:29 pm »
As far as your post, I appreciate the info but its the last part (about the different ingested foods contribute to internal pH) is what is so confusing!
Certain acidic foods actually alkalize your body! Meats are extremely acidifying! Things that can't survive in the pH of your stomach! pH doesn't matter at all!
Yes, so very confusing.

Just thought I should add that raw meats are much, much less acidic than cooked meats. Also, the more processed a food is the more acidic it is(part  of processing , after all, involves creating an acidic environment that's hsotile to bacteria).

15058
General Discussion / Re: Dr Ron's Organ Delight
« on: August 06, 2008, 04:03:08 am »
yeah i have tried kidney and liver, both raw and honestly it was the worst must digusting tasting food i have ever eaten, i dont think i can get use to it, its awful; it tasted like 100% pure barnyard.

I, like most beginners, had much the same reaction to certain raw organs like liver(I found raw kidney much easier). However, the pain and illness I incurred from eating cooked-diets was so great that I had no choice(avoidance of pain is often a bigger incentive than the pursuit of pleasure) - then, of course, I got used to and started to enjoy the taste and disliked the taste of cooked-foods, in most cases. Of course, it doesn't work for everybody - I tried, once, early on, convincing my father to go rawpalaeo(he was extreme diabetic type 2 etc.) and, while he was happy to investigate the raw dairy, the look of terror on his face when I suggested that he try raw meats was enough to make me not bother with such advice any more(he died a year later from heart-trouble).  Just try all the various solutions suggested(eg:- bolting down small slivers without chewing, followed by gulps of mineral-water etc.).

15059
General Discussion / Re: Raw meat and poo
« on: August 06, 2008, 03:55:38 am »
Stefansson wanted to promote a cooked-meat diet minus organ-meats because he knew that people were squeamish about organ-meats and raw meats so that it would be difficult for it to be opoular among the public. So, understandably, he was heavily biased when he claimed, erroneously, that the Inuit didn't eat lots of raw meat. In fact, it's well-known that not only did the Inuit eat lots of raw meat, especially the organs, but they also ate plenty of aged/fermented raw fish which they stored in the ice and which was among their most favourite foods.

Here's a typical example of the kind of raw-meat-heavy diet that Arctic tribes often consumed:-

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/story/2008/05/13/ST2008051302252.html

15060
Personals / Re: Attraction
« on: August 06, 2008, 03:39:12 am »
Like Satya said, we should be careful not to adopt a 'them and us" approach to those on cooked-food diets.

Mind you , what I love is being lectured by certain old-aged SAD-eaters on how cooked-diets are perfectly OK, as the others are invariably in an appalling state of health.

15061
General Discussion / Re: Mixing Acidic and Alkaline Foods
« on: August 06, 2008, 03:35:25 am »
I usually prefer eating any food separately from any other food(ie half and hour between each). The only exception is suet and marrow which I use with my meats.

15062
General Discussion / Re: Raw meat and poo
« on: August 05, 2008, 08:28:33 pm »
Lately I have been experiencing cramps in my insides, lots of air(?) when I eat a cooked meat meal. 

Now I'm scared to eat a cooked meat meal. 

I don't know if my digestive flora have changed.

I wonder if this is what Geoff used to experience.


In the first  days after switching to rawpalaeo, I had (2-3) days of constant very green, loose diarrhea, due to toxins leaving the body - I had occasional constipation(such as when I ate raw dairy, to which it turns out I'm allergic), or diarrhea(after eating some dodgy fruits from a supermarket), but these incidences were extremely infrequent and very minor, by comparison to the regular stomach-aches, constipation and vomiting etc., that I suffered when eating cooked-animal-food diets . After that transition to mostly raw,  usually whenever I ate the occasional cooked-food, I'd have a sluggish digestion, lots of gas developing etc., stools would be larger than if I ate the same amount raw(due, no doubt, to less effective  absorption by the body). My digestion has improved over the years, so that I no longer get vast stomach-aches from eating the occasional cooked animal food, but I still get many minor  side-effects of sorts, depending on the toxicity of the cooked-food.


15063
The only animals domesticated in the Palaeolithic were dogs(c.15,000 BC, 5,000 years into the Palaeolithic era).

*Forgot - sheep and goats were domesticated right at the transition between the Neolithic and the Palaeolithic:-

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestication#Approximate_dates_and_locations_of_original_domestication

Anyway, until the Neolithic came round, one can safely assume that the only dairy drunk was other's milk.

15064
General Discussion / Re: CRON-O-METER Nutrient Program
« on: August 04, 2008, 07:31:36 pm »
I've tried doing alternate day fasting bout it didn't work for me. You see, you have to remember to eat large amounts on the days you're allowed to eat food, as otherwise you get real hunger-pangs which are most distracting. My preference is to eat once a day, but quite often I will find myself concentrating heavily on one or two issues, during the week, and will simply forget to eat for a day or two, here and there.

15065
The shellfish thing I think is self-evident; of course they were around in paleo times but they were obviously less a part of anyone's diet than land animals. Even today if you had a nice piece of land on the coast, several hundred acres, I would imagine just naturally you would hunt more land animals than fish/shellfish because it's more reward per effort and requires less tools.

I don't know of any cultures consuming dairy in paleolithic times myself but it does have a long history in Mongolia (camel dairy) and probably other places. I would not be surprised either way, whether it was consumed pre or post Neolithic, but it seems the possibility is there and hasn't been disproven. That's really the idea here is that saying dairy is absolutely only Neolithic in every civilization requires more burden of proof than saying perhaps it wasn't. I agree though it's more likely that dairy is generally or completely Neolithic.

You'd be surprised how much shellfish one can pick up on an isolated beach free of human interference.  I believe "wodgina" mentioned how his own local beaches are absolutely covered in them. One should also remember that hunter-gatherers tend to view all sorts of things as food which modern peoples never would(for example, I eat raw limpets when I'm on the Italian coast, but these don't appear on most(if not all) Western menus in restaurants. Granted, though, the migrating herds of bison would have perhaps been easier to deal with.

Another point is that, at least in the Late Palaeolithic, the various peoples had at least rafts and perhaps even boats - otherwise the Australian Aborigines couldn't have reached  Australia c.40,000 years ago - AFAIK, there was no land-bridge connecting Australia to Southeast Asia at the time.

As regards dairy, it's been suggested by a few Fallonites et al, that dairy might have been consumed in the Palaeolithic. This seems unlikely as cattle, according to online sources, were only domesticated at around 8,000 BC, well into the Neolithic era. Some have suggested that hunters in Palaeolithic times must have drunk the milk from the udders of slain wild cows(ie female aurochs), but the amounts of milk left in udders after death  is very small - indeed, in mammals, milk-production is stimulated via  hormones in response to the suckling effect of the relevant infant, so there's no need to store milk in the breast-area.


15066
General Discussion / Re: Dr Ron's Organ Delight
« on: August 04, 2008, 06:03:28 pm »
do you think this supplement is worth it?

i cant eat raw meat, but i was thinking of doing raw vegetarian diet (eggs) and just take this supplement?

In the long-term, the above is NOT  a solution, on its own. In the short-term, if you were supplementing with higher doses of Dr Ron's supplements(ie buying some of the more specific organs and glands), then you'd likely avoid some of the more serious deficiencies that can arise from a Raw Vegan diet - but the Organic Organ Delight on its own has only a sixth of the amounts for each organ/gland that the more specific Dr Ron's supplements have - my  suggestion would be to get hold of the thyroid and adrenal glands for any glandular-related health issues plus the specific supplements for liver, heart and pancreas(and maybe kidney, though not really as important) - in view of the lack of raw animal food in your diet,  3 pills a day would be best(just open the gelatin capsules and tap the stuff out, as the gelatin of the capsule blocks absorption of the nutrients to some extent). In addition to the specific supplements for liver, pancreas etc., you would also definitely need a spoonful or two of  fermented cod-liver-oil or krill-oil every day  in order to get sufficient Omega-3 fatty acids(Blue Ice fermented cod-liver oil is the only one I know which is genuinely raw without additives - Mercola recommends a particular Krill Oil as being OK - have a look at his site re this).

But this is all a stop-gap and really doesn't solve your health-issues in the long-term. It would be far better to eat plenty of minimally-cooked meats/organ-meats and see if, over time, you can reduce the cooking-temperature by a degree , every so often - this would also be a lot cheaper than buying a multitude of supplements to support an otherwise nutritionally-deficient diet. If, for any reason, you are absolutely unable to ever eat raw meats of any kind, despite taking longer to transition to raw, then at least the minimally-cooked meats are not quite  as bad as highly-processed/heavily-cooked junk-food.

15067
General Discussion / Re: Cacao
« on: August 04, 2008, 05:38:43 pm »
Haven't touched cacao since going rawpalaeo.

15068
General Discussion / Re: maca
« on: August 04, 2008, 05:36:42 pm »
i actually have hashimotos ( which is an autoimmune disease)

i also have a whole host of fatty acid/ vitamin/ mineral deficiencies.

also i have extremely low testosterone levels, and weak adrenal functioning...


a doctor diagnosed me with these; i have got a massive amount of testing done;

i dont know if diet can help me or not anymore. i may need hormonal replacement


Given that Hashimoto's is designated as an auto-immune disease, it would be a good idea to avoid raw dairy, in case you're currently eating raw butter etc. Dairy and grains are a really bad idea for those with auto-immune issues.

15069
General Discussion / Re: CRON-O-METER Nutrient Program
« on: August 04, 2008, 05:27:37 pm »
Who says that?

I know the Up day down day diet has a similar theme.

There were some studies mentioned on the fasting  yahoo group which stated that leaving more than 24 hours between meals(ie not eating every alternate day) was more effective than eating just one meal a day. I can't recall, offhand, though, which studies confirmed this.

15070
General Discussion / Re: CRON-O-METER Nutrient Program
« on: August 03, 2008, 11:46:03 pm »
The best IF routine is supposed to be to eat only every alternate day.

15071
General Discussion / Re: Social Pressures
« on: August 03, 2008, 09:19:14 pm »
How do you deal with the social pressures?

i find this to be the hardest part, when im home i can eat 100% raw good, but if at a party or holiday its extremely difficult and if i just eat fruit or something and turn down the food, i get an awkward stare and a feeling of being tense...people connect through food.

how do you do it?! and still keep friends and family.

i want to be the life of the party but not engage in there unhealthy acts... i havent been able todo it yet.

Also, do you ever lecture friends or family? or is it best to not say anything?

This is a much-needeed question to ask on this board. I was wondering when people would get around to it.

Here are various suggestions offered by various RPDers over time, to cope with social pressures:-

1) Be confident about your diet. If you show nervousness when explaining your diet, then other people will feel nervous too. In short, humans are naturally empathic, and it's wise not to show any uncertainty re your diet. That said, it's not a good idea to boast about the diet in public unnecessarily- , if you're asked, mention that you're doing a raw, palaeolithic diet,  vaguely in passing, as though it's only a minor part of your life. No one has a clue about what a "raw, palaeolithic diet" is, and few will enquire further, usually.

2) Make compromises. Some American RPDers go to restaurants and ask the chef to cook their meats "cold on a cold plate", meaning the meats are only cooked for 10 seconds on either side, or so. Or they always invite people to restaurants offering raw seafood such as Japanese Sashimi restaurants etc.(my favourite option as they usually offer sushi as well which is good for my cooked-food-eating acquaintances). Some do naughty things like go and eat raw at  Korean restaurants - some types of Korean restaurant give you the pan etc. on the table along with  the raw animal food which they expect you to cook right there, but some RPDers just go to an isolated table and pretend to cook them, but just warm them for a few seconds).

3) Third option is to eat some high-meat and some enzymes before going out to  every single cooked-meal, so as to minimise digestive-issues that often arise after such meals. Also, eat those cooked-foods but just eat little bites at each meal, claiming that you're on a diet.


4) There are various sites online which tell you how to reduce the amounts of toxins created by cooking:-

http://www.aolhealth.com/health/bbq-grill-cooking-safety

5) Re lecturing:- Don't bother lecturing anybody. I was in an appalling state of health pre-raw diet with  extremely obvious quite visible symptoms of ill-health, yet most people around me just pretended that I was always OK  with no difference after several years on raw - I even have one acquaintance who is a total moron (and a doctor), who tried to delude himself that I was only a little healthy as a result of eating less fat(actually, I told him that my raw-fat-intake was pretty high). This moron is a 100% believer in the Balanced Diet and is in appalling state of ill-health(he's 69 and has to take pain-killers every single day in order to cope with extremely painful joints ruined by decades on cooked diets).

 Plus, by avoiding the preaching/lecturing, you avoid the "them and us" view that some Rawists mistakenly have. After all, if you criticise other peoples' diets, you can't expect them not to criticise yours. The best thing is to just do the diet, and occasionally some wise people will notice how healthy you are and ask questions. Few will go all-raw, unless they're in dire straits, but one or two, here and there, will make healthier choices such as eating lots of sushi instead of the usual fried junk-food or whatever. At least, that's what I've found.



*Hopefully, others on this board will have further suggestions re this rather important topic*.

15072
General Discussion / Re: maca
« on: August 03, 2008, 08:46:31 pm »
I used to go in for adaptogenic herbs like Siberian Ginseng but they did nothing for me(well I was in such an awful state thanks to dairy, that no herb would have worked).

Here's a minor cautionary note re Maca which I found on wikipedia:-

"However, maca does contain glucosinolates, which can cause goitres when high consumption is combined with a diet low in iodine."

15073
Karl Loren, judging from what I read earlier, likes to promote Aajonus' Primal Diet but only eats partially-raw. I have to admit that his website was very useful when I first started this diet all those years ago (at the time, it was the only website on Raw-Animal-Food diets other than Vinny's website).

15074
*Just noticed this thread and thought I ought to add a couple of points*

First, there is pretty sparse evidence from Palaeolithic times. One can reasonably state that meat-eating was more common than plant-eating, as current evidence in favour of this is in the majority, but there are some concerns re the dating and analysis of some evidence such as ancient hominid bones, so one can't state for certain that palaeos ate zero-carb or omnivorous diets - could even be a mixture of both, depending on the regions etc.

As regards, fish, again there's some controversy. There's the Aquatic Ape theory which states that we gained our intelligence/bigger brains, millions of years ago, from eating huge amounts of raw seafood rich in EFAs. On the other hand, one palaeo guru(Cordain?) claims that seafood-consumption only became a major part of the human diet c.20,000 years ago, with the first  evidence of some seafood being eaten  occurring c.300,000 years ago. But, again, there's so little evidence from so far back in time, that it's going to take major scientific advances re dating and the finding of fossils, before one can reasonably conclude when seafood was introduced.

I generally use Palaeo-theory only as a guideline, given the lack of data, in general. In my own case, I can only say that I don't thrive as well if I don't include some raw seafood in my diet - just meats/organ-meats and fats for my animal-food didn't work for me, whether on zero-carb or otherwise. On the other hand, I've tried an all-raw-seafood diet and didn't do well on that, either.


15075
General Discussion / Re: Raw fat vs Cooked fat
« on: August 03, 2008, 06:37:23 pm »
Here's an excerpt in this section of the  wikipedia "Saturated Fat" page:-

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturated_fat#Dietary_recommendations

"Another confounding issue may be the formation of exogenous (outside the body) advanced glycation endproducts (AGEs) and oxidation products generated during cooking, which it appears some of the studies have not controlled for. It has been suggested that, "given the prominence of this type of food in the human diet, the deleterious effects of high-(saturated)fat foods may be in part due to the high content in glycotoxins, above and beyond those due to oxidized fatty acid derivatives." [34] The glycotoxins, as he called them, are more commonly called AGEs[28]"

You should also be able to find any number of webpages showing how easily EFAs(essential fatty acids) get turned to transfats by heat(eg:- "All these oils are available at natural foods stores and should be cold and raw when consumed, not used in cooking because again, with the exception of olive oil (which is higher in saturated fat), exposure to high heat and oxygen damages unsaturated fats and creates trans fatty acids." taken from:-

http://www.womentowomen.com/nutritionandweightloss/fatandcholesterol.aspx



Pages: 1 ... 598 599 600 601 602 [603] 604 605 606 607 608 ... 612
SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk