Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - TylerDurden

Pages: 1 ... 577 578 579 580 581 [582] 583 584 585 586 587 ... 612
14526
Hot Topics / Re: Charles Zero-Carb Running Journal
« on: October 25, 2008, 05:21:11 pm »
Nicola, it just occurred to me that this topic should have been put in the Hot Topics forum, in the first place, as that's really the forum for discussing any alleged benefits of cooked-zero-carb/raw vegan/cooked-junk-food etc. diets.

*Forgot to add 1 other point:- I'm always deeply suspicious of anybody who claims 100% success on any diet, without any issues whatsoever. If they don't mention at least some setback  on their path to health, no matter how slight, or worse, as in the case of some others(not Charles) start making outrageous claims, such as the notion of being able to live forever on such-and-such-a-diet or become as strong as  Arnie without the need for any exercise whatsoever etc., then there's good reason to be think that a great deal of exaggeration is involved.

14527
General Discussion / Re: how long is raw fish safe to eat
« on: October 25, 2008, 12:15:54 am »
At an AV lecture he said that Norway or some other Scandinavian country I can't quite remember is the only country you should buy farmed fish from. He said that they feed the fish well at their farms there and are the only people that know how to farm fish well.

Really? That's interesting. No one should buy any farmed fish from Scotland, that's for sure!

14528
General Discussion / Re: Mineral water?
« on: October 24, 2008, 11:53:14 pm »
I would agree that there are some microscopic amounts in mineral-water, but I just don't view them as being an issue. Besides, from what I've read elsewhere on the subject, the mineral-water bottles have to be left out for years before it becomes an issue re contamination.

As for the environmental issue, I agree that importing mineral-water from very far away, like Fiji, is a bad idea, but I'd much rather be drinking mineral-water from more local areas(in my case, Wales and Scotland) is far preferable to drinking the fluoridated/chlorinated London tapwater - though tapwater-quality when I go abroad is so good in certain areas that I can drink that, instead, fortunately.

There are a few 1-litre glass bottles of mineral-water , found here and there, but, needless to say, there are no glass-bottle equivalents of the 5-litre mineral-water (plastic) bottles that I normally get. It would be hellish for me to lug heavy glass bottles all over the place.

14529
General Discussion / Re: how long is raw fish safe to eat
« on: October 24, 2008, 08:30:43 pm »
You'll find that wild norwegian salmon is at least 2-3 times as expensive as farmed salmon, I'm afraid. Shipping internationally as far as the Phillipines may drag costs even higher.

14530
Exercise / Bodybuilding / Re: exercise > weight loss?
« on: October 24, 2008, 05:48:45 pm »
Yes, water-retention is a big problem for those on carb-filled diets and cooking (and dairy-consumption, even raw dairy,makes things much  worse, as regards weight-gain/water-retention).

14531
General Discussion / Re: how long is raw fish safe to eat
« on: October 24, 2008, 05:58:42 am »
Yes, Andrew's right, there's no reason to worry about the issue of raw fish. After all, the Inuit ate plenty of rotting fish, as a "mood-booster" of sorts, among other populations. I believe the Norwegian version is "rakfisk" and the Swedish version is called "Surstromming".

All that said, when I was a newbie, I was not used to most types of raw animal food, and I was so squeamish about the taste, that I would throw away anything that was left in the fridge for more than 2 days! After a short while, I got used to eating raw seafood  and then, later on, other kinds of raw animal foods and was able to eat aged raw meats like "high-meat", over time. I have sometimes, out of carelessness, left some raw shellfish(usually oysters) in a fridge at a low setting for 2 weeks , and have eaten them with no issues, though, generally speaking, I find it best to eat raw seafood within a week of purchase(if left in the fridge). I can wait longer than that to eat raw meats/organ-meats from land-mammals, as I'm more used to the taste of aged raw meats, really.

14532
General Discussion / WikiAnswers
« on: October 23, 2008, 11:31:09 pm »
My new initiative is to target sites like Wiki-Answers to add proper answers to questions about raw meat diets. I would strongly encourage members to go to such sites, from time to time, and answer/edit answers there, as there's so much misinformation out there(1 current, rather stupid question being "why can animals eat raw meat and humans can't?"):-

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Special:Search&search=raw%2Bmeat

14533
Journals / Re: Yuri recovery
« on: October 23, 2008, 10:46:26 pm »
More and more I wonder if either zero- or low-carb diets truly require 80% fat. Perhaps 50-60% by calories is more like it.

14534
General Discussion / Re: Mineral water?
« on: October 23, 2008, 12:57:36 am »
Somehow I doubt that the PH value goes down if one leave bottled water out there for years. As for the whole plastic issue, only a few RPDers give that any credence.

14535
General Discussion / Re: Youtube videos please!!!
« on: October 22, 2008, 09:46:08 pm »
I don't know about others, but when I double-click the video it opens up the youtube page

This just shows how technologically illiterate I am. I just clicked once, each time.

14536
You could e-mail Aajonus at optimal@earthlink.net and ask him about it. In the process, you might even suggest him appearing on Youtube, perhaps!

14537
What kind of climate does Tasmania have then? Just temperate? Or quite cold, like Scotland, say? Up till now, I'd always been under the impression that Australia and New Zealand were tropical paradises all over.

14538
General Discussion / Re: Youtube videos please!!!
« on: October 22, 2008, 06:25:41 pm »
That's pretty good - thanks edwin. Only drawback is that only us Moderators are the only ones who can see the actual youtube address via checking via the modify button. I suppose, though, that a youtube search under raw palaeo diet would find it.

14539
General Discussion / Re: Youtube videos please!!!
« on: October 22, 2008, 04:35:19 am »
"Fraid not. But, I'm sure that suggestions could be made:- "How about:- Raw Shaman", "Raw Witchdoctor", "mammoth-hunter",  "raw predator" etc.?

14540
Off Topic / Re: Happy Birthday, Sarav!!!!
« on: October 22, 2008, 03:55:31 am »
Happy Birthday!

14541
General Discussion / Re: Youtube videos please!!!
« on: October 22, 2008, 03:55:04 am »
Uhh, I thought we would get new titles as we reached each stage. Why, oh why, am I still considered "Chief", when I've reached 1,000 posts. I'd thought that we'd already chosen 20-odd different titles for each stage(10,100,500, 1,000 posts etc.). Craig, come up with something cool as a title for 1,000th post, please! ;)

14542
General Discussion / Re: Youtube videos please!!!
« on: October 22, 2008, 03:52:29 am »
Hmmm... I thought my ears were ringing! Tyler is way ahead of me re posts. I'll have more time next month but I do check in daily to make sure things are running properly. I'm wondering what's happened to Lex though.

Youtube videos are a most excellent idea. Volunteers anyone?

Craig

Youtube videos would encourage many more members to join, especially if they were filled with intelligent, scientific-oriented explanations(ie no cultlike behaviour of the Raw Vegan kind). One of the 2 primary reasons for the lack of popularity of RAF diets is, simply, that there's so little info on them, online, so no one curious can find them(I mean I thought of raw-meat-diets as a last resort somewhere between my early- to-mid-20s, yet it took till I was 29, to find any reference, online, to Raw-Animal-Food Diets for Humans(as opposed to ones for animals)

Well,  I've done my bit as regards the Raw Foodism Wikipedia page etc., but what would really generate 100s, perhaps a 1,000 or 2,000, new members, with each successive media-surge, would be  interviews with a national newspaper or local TV-station by 1 or more RAFers in the English-speaking world. Look at all the publicity that was  generated by the RAF-eating Haigwoods appearing on that episode of the US TV-series version of WifeSwap.

14543
General Discussion / Re: Youtube videos please!!!
« on: October 22, 2008, 02:33:00 am »
OK, I've done my bit. A long while back I sent a complaint to the British (science-based) Focus magazine, complaining because, in an answer to "why can't humans eat raw meat?", they included a caption with the absolutist statement that humans would die on a raw-meat-based diet. I have now sent a further complaint now that they have included a reference to Wrangham, in a new, recent, article on diet and evolution.

How about others doing their bit re media-outreach?

14544
Important Info for Newbies / The Benefits of Bacteria
« on: October 22, 2008, 12:55:58 am »
(Please don't post on this thread, as this is an ongoing attempt to create a permanent sticky topic on the benefits of bacteria)


Bacteria-rich food has been a staple food of the Inuit who used the  bacteria within the "high-meat" they ate  to lift their spirits. Here's an article referring to a scientific study which goes into more detail on how this works:-


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1547346/Getting-dirty-could-prevent-depression.html



It's best to Google the term "hygiene hypothesis" which is the theory that
bacteria and parasites have several benefits(eg:-

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hygiene_hypothesis

)

 You'll then find numerous examples
of the benefits of bacteria all over the place. Here are some examples, along
with their shortened tinyurl links:-

(bacteria protect against diabetes type 1)

http://www.firstscience.com/home/news/breaking-news-all-topics/jdrf-funded-study-links-hygiene-hypothesis-to-diabetes-prevention_53765.html

http://tinyurl.com/5nuehs


(bacteria prevent bowel disease)

http://www.reuters.com/article/healthNews/idUSCOL15665020080802

http://tinyurl.com/5oa6qe

(there's already plenty of evidence linking lack of exposure to bacteria to
asthma and other allergy-related illnesses:-


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12487209?dopt=AbstractPlus

http://tinyurl.com/5a8zyb


Info on the benefits of fermented foods:-

http://blog.sethroberts.net/the-unami-hypothesis-why-i-believe-fermented-foods-are-necessary-for-health/


14545
General Discussion / Re: Youtube videos please!!!
« on: October 22, 2008, 12:26:40 am »
Plus, I've checked other forums of this type  which deal with relatively obscure topics, and some of them have been remarkably successful, primarily because they have had various people willing to do interviews with the media, whether with local newspapers, radio or even Television. Obviously, this would require someone with the courage to indulge in public-speaking without developing stage-fright(so count me out!). It's just that I'd like to read about Aajonus in the Daily Telegraph, for example. Anyone willing to volunteer for this?

14546
General Discussion / Re: Acid-Base
« on: October 21, 2008, 09:28:30 pm »
I was forced to drink water with lemons squeezed into it beforehand, in Kenya. This is presumably an anti-insect technique(?) The stuff tasted foul, so I'd never do it again.

14547
Hot Topics / Re: Charles Zero-Carb Running Journal
« on: October 21, 2008, 07:42:54 pm »

I disagree that not eating cooked-starch for years makes it indigestible. For one thing, unlike Lex and co, I'm not following a zero-carb diet but a low-carb one, so carbs, cooked or not, don't have the same effect on me as they do to Lex.

As regards the Christmas Pudding, if I eat a standard Christmas Pudding I always suffer greatly because of the heated vegetable-oils in it - in the last few years, though, I've eaten only organic Christmas Puddings which don't have vegetable-oils so I'm less affected by them.

If I had children, I would undoubtedly feed them on raw animal foods. After all, despite your claims, raw animal foods can be quite soft(eg:- raw liver, raw fish/shellfish etc.), and even muscle-meats like raw leg of mutton are quite soft - though I would always cut up the meats beforehand for children to eat better. Of course, in Palaeo times, children were breastfed for much longer periods(c.1 year) until their teeth were fully developed and able to handle raw meats.

14548
General Discussion / Youtube videos please!!!
« on: October 21, 2008, 07:31:12 pm »
OK, if we're going to lift RAF diets out of obscurity, we are going to need more Youtube videos posted about us wonderful people. I strongly recommend that our members do so. At the moment, all we have are videos mostly criticising raw-meat diets, such as a couple made by a Raw Vegan fanatic.

Even better would be to get  Youtube videos of Aajonus or some Inuit/Eskimoes eating raw meats.

14549
Hot Topics / Barry Groves Daily Telegraph Article
« on: October 21, 2008, 06:55:09 pm »
Here's an interesting interview of Barry Groves in the Daily Telegraph:-


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/health/3230846/Healthy-food-Should-we-be-eating-more-fat.html

For those unfamiliar with Barry Groves, he's an advocate of animal-foods, albeit cooked. I have to admit I felt like gagging at all that mention of cooked-lard in the above article - yuck! -v -v

14550
Hot Topics / Re: Charles Zero-Carb Running Journal
« on: October 21, 2008, 06:45:10 pm »
The idea that grassfed meat is always expensive is nonsense. I've managed to get hold of very cheap grassfed horsemeat in Italy, for example, which is FAR cheaper than the grainfed beef on offer, over there. Same here in the UK, I can get whole wild-hare carcasses, complete with organ-meats, inside(albeit headless), for 10-11 pounds each(13 pounds if I don't order them regularly, which is rare), a massive grassfed leg of mutton for 14-16 pounds sterling etc. Plus, as grainfed meat is inferior nutritionally, one has to eat more of it to get most of the right nutrients, though one would miss out on omega-3s, mostly.

What irks me, though, is that cooked-zero-carbers are following such highly artificial diets, yet frequently cite the Eskimos/Inuit as supposed proof that their diet  works, in the long-term. In fact, the Inuits followed a diet that was radically different from most cooked-zero-carbers - for one thing, they ate large amounts of organ-meats, ate much of their meats raw, and ate meats from wild-animals with much, much  higher levels of omega-3s than would be found in supermarket, grainfed meats.

Pages: 1 ... 577 578 579 580 581 [582] 583 584 585 586 587 ... 612
SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk