Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - TylerDurden

Pages: 1 ... 584 585 586 587 588 [589] 590 591 592 593 594 ... 612
14701
Health / Re: Itchy scalp
« on: September 21, 2008, 01:39:06 am »
People always remark how my light-brown hair becomes blondish after some exposure to the Mediterranean sun.

14702
Off Topic / Re: Coming Clean
« on: September 21, 2008, 01:33:46 am »
Never EVER proselytize about this diet! I tried this, in the early stages, with my father, who'd developed a massive potbelly and type 2 diabates/heart-trouble etc, c.10-20 years before. All he would go in for was the raw dairy and nothing else - he was just too terrified of raw meats etc. He would make excuses, such as the idea that every diet should include a "banned food" in order to allow one to continue with it. He died 6 months later. The ONLY way one can convince others(and even then it's iffy at best) is to lead by example re health-improvement - one out of every 100 acquaintances  will notice, over the years, that you're healthier and younger-looking than others of your age-group, and perhaps a 1/10th of that number will actually do something about it, such as eating more raw animal food, such as raw oysters etc.

ONE other thing:- you're a very lucky man. You live in the US, the mecca of raw animal foodists. OK, you may not live in RAF-heavy California, but there are Primal Potlucks for raw animal foodists appearing in most US states every few months. Just travel to whichever event Aajonus is going to appear next at,  over the next year, and you're bound to find several people who live in your State(or neighbouring States). Contact aajonus at optimal@earthlink.net for furher info re Primal Potlucks or Aajonus workshops in your area etc. in your area - at the very least, he'll put you on his e-mailing-list re providing furthr info.

14703
Off Topic / Re: MBTI
« on: September 21, 2008, 01:19:55 am »
I'm afraid Jung's ideas have, these days, been as  discredited as Freud was in the past. Yes, I've done these tests, before, and I think(?) I got INTP, every single time as a result. But we are all so different as individuals, that I don't think that humanity can be reliably divided into just 16 types.

14704
General Discussion / Re: To Chew or not to Chew
« on: September 21, 2008, 01:13:41 am »
You've overlooked a number of obvious points:- First of all, the recommendation re drinking water as well is ONLY for those newbies who can't handle raw organ-meats. Those who are used to eating raw liver etc., don't  really bother with drinking mineral-water, afterwards. I suppose I'll have to make that clear in the relevant thread.

Secondly, modern RPDers only use knives due to concerns re fitting into society etc. I could just as easily tear into my raw meats/organ-meats with my teeth, but this would result in a lot of blood all over the place, which would be most unsightly to non-RPDers. Sure, I could strip down and go naked, but I'd still get blood on my face. As it is, some meats/organ-meats require me to use my teeth, most of the time, rather than a meat-knife(such as my wild-hare carcasses). In the case of raw liver, it would actually be much easier to just use my teeth, as the connective tissue is more difficult to cut with a meat-knife, unless sharpened specially.

Re bolting:- I do chew once or twice before bolting down my raw meats, but I don't need to do any more. This seems typical of other RPDers.


14705
General Discussion / Re: New to forum - Hello
« on: September 20, 2008, 10:11:54 pm »
I would love to get something like that organised but it's a bit lonely for RAF'ers in my neck of the woods. Good samaritans the closest! The amount of London people will start to grow for sure? there seems to be a few. It will happen, I would move to London if it did, just for the summer though!

The truth is that there are a lot more raw-animal-foodists in  the UK(and elsewhere) than you might imagine. Trouble is that most people on any Internet forums rarely bother posting even once, just reading the posts, so it's impossible to identify them all, let alone those RAFers who never both going online at all - I keep on hearing vaguely from people like Jon C Fox about how they get large numbers of orders from the UK for Aajonus' books, for example, and I notice, sometimes, that someone's put "_uk" or similiar in their username when looking at the group-lists of usernames.
. There's a Yahoo group called "livefoodoz"(search under "aajonus" on Yahoo Groups, and scroll down), plus there are a few mentions online Re Australian "Instinctos' who eat a little raw animal food, usually.

14706
Health / Re: Itchy scalp
« on: September 20, 2008, 10:03:16 pm »
I haven't used shampoo for years, and my hair self-regulates re cleanliness so it's fine. In pre-rawpaleo days, my hair was so ultra-greasy that I had to wahs my hair pretty often.

14707
General Discussion / Re: New to forum - Hello
« on: September 20, 2008, 06:15:08 pm »
Hey Geoff

I'm starting to get the feeling that you believe hide fat is better than suet. I'm open to the idea also, where did you get the info that hide fat has more omega 3. Suet seams to be prized by weston price primitives but I'm guessing hide fat was too.

I would love to just have a huge supply of ox tongue, that fat is special IMO I have no evidence though...

Either Lex or Gary(Via) mentioned this point re suet from the kidney area being far more saturated than fat elsewhere - since that kind of suet is what is usually on offer, that's not so good. Large amounts of hide-fat are very difficult to get hold of unless you live in a region where cattle are kept beyond the 30-month-slaughtering-limit imposed by the EU.

I also wish I could get a regular supply of tongue, but there's just no demand for it. I actually think that if we all started banding together into local,raw animal food cooperatives like some Primal Dieters do in the States then we would have enough financial muscle-power to get farmers to give us whatever organ-meats we want.

14708
Off Topic / Re: Coming Clean
« on: September 20, 2008, 06:08:41 pm »
It can take 8-12 months to start enjoying raw for some people. I found it much easier to just try small amounts of so many different varieties, that I inevitably found some raw animal foods which I liked instantly(in my own case, mostly raw fish, especially raw shellfish, and raw goat, initially). The alternative is to start off with lightly-cooked meat, and slowly reduce cooking-temperature over time.

One problem I had was when walking past restaurants, as they routinely waft the smell of food onto the pavement so as to entice customers. While I was no longer attracted to the taste of cooked-animal foods, for various reasons, I was attracted by the smell, so I simply visualised in my mind the resulting stomach-pains that would occur if I did eat the food offered by the various restaurants.

Another option, other than the above, is to eat cooked-/processed stuff but go for healthier versions thereof. So, in the case of alcohol, go in for "Real Ale"(also known as "cask-conditioned ale" or "bottle-conditioned" ale in the US), or go in for clear, transparent spirits. Real Ale is technically rawpalaeo in that it's raw and full of live, fermenting bacteria, and unlike lager and normal beers, doesn't contain preservatives. Don't buy any supposed "Real Ale" in pubs/bars as these are mostly pasteurised, get them from bottles in shops/supermarkets which have the term "bottle-conditioned" or "secondary fermentation within the bottle" on their labels - the bottles should all have a metal covering over the cork or cap of the bottle, with wires going round the top, slightly further down(to prevent the gases inside from bursting the cap off). Transparent spirits are also recommended as it's the congeners/preservatives within alcoholic drinks which cause the worst hangovers, and these congeners are what give spirits their colour - so vodka, clear gin etc. is better than whisky, say.


14709
Info / News Items / Announcements / Re: Dairy Dangers
« on: September 20, 2008, 05:53:34 pm »
i do consume a fair amount of raw dairy(raw butter is amazing) but i must say if i eat/ drink too much in the course of a couple of days i get a sore throat which will disappear within 24 hours if i dont consume anymore...perhaps there is something to be said for that but i do find it makes me feel good and i otherwise process it just fine.

It's common to experience euphoria from drinking dairy - I experienced this myself(along with a subsequent rise and drastic fall in energy-levels), and, as a result of this euphoria, I continued to drink raw dairy for months afterwards, until I finally realised that it was doing me a lot of harm. The euphoria is due to the opioids in the dairy. However, these opioids are very addictive, which is why people often find it so difficult to wean themselves off the foul stuff.

14710
General Discussion / Re: Mineral water?
« on: September 20, 2008, 06:06:17 am »
Yeah, I never buy tap water. I buy spring water by the gallon.
I haven't seen mineral water in 5L bottles ever... you'd probably have to order those online, huh?

Do you recommend alkaline mineral water for taste reasons only? I just checked and the kinds I've been drinking are less than 7.0 pH. I think they taste fine, but is there another reason why alkaline would be better?


I gather that alkaline mineral-water is what we mostly get from mountain-streams and lakes which is what palaeo hunters would have drunk, most of the time.

Re 5-litre bottle:- No, I get them from any of 1,000s of corner shops around London. Even the supermarkets now stock 5-litre bottles of mineral-water in some cases(either that or they put 6 bottles of 1.5 littres together, wrapped in one plastic case, and sell the water at a discount).

14711
General Discussion / Re: New to forum - Hello
« on: September 20, 2008, 05:43:51 am »
Thanks Geoff.  Layer Marney does look good.  Incredibly they're relatively local too.  I grew up in Essex so I know the area well.  I will contact them to try to divulge further feed information such as what they're fed during the housed period between Jan - March.  I also came across another place which looks really good and it's cycling distance from me!  I'm waiting to hear back from them by email but if I get a chance will try to visit this weekend.  See what you think of Brecks Farm here: http://www.back-to-the-garden.co.uk/

On the subject of eating lamb in general and you mentioning buying a whole leg - how do you go about eating it? Most lamb cuts seem to be so fatty! I've only ever eaten cutlets or meaty chops.  Do you eat all of that fat too?!  I've always had a real problem eating the meat fat on the organic beef I buy as it, literally, makes me gag. 

Interestingly though, I had my 1st delivery from the Well Hung Meat Company today and have eaten 1/2kg of their braising steak tonight including the extensive amount of surrounding fat.  It didn't make me gag at all and was actually quite nice!  The meat tasted so different to what I've been used to as well.  As I'd read about grass-fed, the muscle meat itself was quite a strong, gamey taste.  Evidence perhaps of their commitment to being grain free!

re: butter - I certainly intend on excluding it from my diet eventually. It's so rare that I have any now that I have virtually excluded it by default! But, I am concerned about my low fat intake.  If I had a reliable source (or any source for that matter!) of suet and marrow then the butter would be history.  An interesting thought about simply using egg yolks though.  As you say, certainly fertilised eggs are unheard of in the UK.  In what way does this alter the avidin argument, however?  I'd be very interested to hear your further comments about that.

wodgina6722  I know exactly where you're coming from!  The worst thing I ever did was introduce a couple of good friends to the primal diet. My butter, cream and honey supply was suddenly reduced by 66% !!!!  :o  Still, taking a more selfless view my actions did help improve their lives & health dramatically.  I'm a little less generous with my sources these days though!  :)

The Brecks farm sounds good. But, still, I've heard horror-stories from 1 or 2 Brits about being told by the farmer that their animals were 100% grassfed only for them to read a brochure which stated that the animals were, in fact, fed some grain etc. Always good to check, first, then to evaluate the product - in my own case, I came across one very dodgy farmer who sold (lightly-pasteurised) dairy as raw(quite common in the UK, as the raw dairy industry is so unregulated) - his suet was also much poorer in taste compared to the high-quality suet I later got from Lower Hurst Farm, so I knew I had been had.

Re lamb-fat:- When I first started the diet, I found it impossible to carry on with it, without turning to wildcaught fish and shellfish. The taste of intensively-farmed grainfed meats was just too disgusting in raw form. The taste of less intensively-farmed organic grainfed meat (such as what I found in Italy at one point) was much better, but it was still so bland that I took no enjoyment in my food and my appetite went right down - fortunately, I found grassfed sources at the LFM markets, so that was fine.

The fat from the Layer Marney leg of lamb/mutton has an excellent taste(though I have to use my teeth to get the last bits of flesh/fat off which is awkward). Other types of white fat such as that onm the beef-hearts I get isn't nearly as good in taste, by comparison.

Re avidin:- Some rawists have claimed that you only get biotin deficiency if you eat the equivalent of 24 raw eggs a day, including the egg-white. Others have claimed that it's better to just eat the egg-yolk as they cite potential side-effects re biotin-deficiency. It's difficult to say, but perhaps one should err on the side of caution, given the lack of fertilised, raw eggs in the UK. Besides, eggs are unlikely to have been a staple of the Palaeolithic Diet given that wild birds generally only lay seasonally, rather than every day like chickens, and in relatively inaccessible areas. I view eggs as only a substitute for not getting other better fats.

Re fat:- The key is to get all those omega-3s. If that means that you have to get them from muscle-meat fat, because you can't get hold of suet/marrow, that's not the end of the world. Just tell the farmers NOT to cut away the fat from the meats, as they usually do before the sale/delivery. Then you'll have lots more available, without needing the suet/marrow. Liver, kidney and tongue are the easiest organ-meats to get hold of and should be available if you keep on Googling and asking farmers - beef-tongue is a lot easier to get hold of than suet or marrow, and is a hefty 50-60% fat, I forget the exact figure. One tip:- I've noticed that I'm far more likely to get a response from farmers if I contact them by phone rather than e-mail.


14712
General Discussion / Re: The Definition of Intermittent Fasting (IF)
« on: September 20, 2008, 04:42:06 am »
I'm guessing its not eating for around 24 hours, like just eating a single meal per day, every day?

I'm having trouble finding an exact definition on the net. Most sites (that I can access--I'm at work) talk about the advantages, disadvantages, etc. without actually saying what it is.

Intermittent Fasting has 3 different definitions:- 1) Consuming 1 large meal a day, usually within a 4-hour period, and nothing else during that day except water(ie fasting every 20-24 hours or so); and 2) Eating as much as you want on one day, and then fast the whole of the next day(excpet for water), then repeating the 2-day-cycle; and 3) a mixture of the two above where you eat just 1 large meal in one day, fast the whole of the next day, then repeat the cycle.Second and third options are rumoured to be more effective(I haven't been able to do those, though, long-term, due to hunger-pangs getting in the way of concentration, so I do option 1 but fast a whole day(up to 3 days in length), from time to time, nonconsecutively.

*Caution - it should be noted that people with certain health-problems, such as adrenal fatigue, are advised NOT to follow IF but to, instead, eat several small meals throughout the day.


14713
Welcoming Committee / Re: Welcome Anavegana!
« on: September 20, 2008, 12:40:28 am »
Welcome Anavegana!

14714
Welcoming Committee / Re: Just arrived
« on: September 20, 2008, 12:39:27 am »
Welcome!

14715
General Discussion / Re: Mineral water?
« on: September 20, 2008, 12:22:27 am »
All I can say re mineral-water is that tap-water and a raw animal food diet do not mix, in my own case. On the few occasions I  added in (London-) tapwater in the past, because I was too lazy to get mineral-water, my appetite and sense of taste would go down - and I'd have a (very slightly) lower sense of wellbeing/energy. This effect is less than it used to be, though. I don't drink mineral-water while on holiday as the tapwater is 99% of the time mineral-water from mountain-streams up above - it's just London that provides me with chlorinated tapwater that's been through c.8 other people's bladders by the time it reaches me.

I recommend alkaline mineral-water - the PH7.0 or below mineral-waters just don't have the right taste, and PH 7.2 to PH 8.4 is roughly what one would more commonly find in rivers and lakes. I would also strongly suggest that you buy them in 5-litre bottles(or whatever that is in gallons?), as that is a great way to cut down on costs. Here in the UK, 1.5 litres will cost c.89 pennies, while a 5-litre mineral-water bottle costs 1 pound and 49 pence.

*Thanks for reminding me re this topic, I'll include a mention re including mineral-water in one's diet if one's in an urban environment where they adulterate the water.*




14716
General Discussion / Re: What are you eating right now?
« on: September 20, 2008, 12:07:18 am »
I'm about to eat some lamb liver that's been in the fridge for a week, or a little over a week.
Is there any bacterial benefit to this at all? Has that been enough time? Or will I just be eating disgusting old liver for no extra benefit at all? I know most high meat is like a month old, right?
This is the oldest meat that I'll have ever eaten. I usually find liver to be pretty gross after 3 days in the fridge... I can't imagine what this is gonna be like.

I find slightly-aged, raw meat to be more digestible than raw meats, but it doesn't have anywhere near the effect of "high-meat". I usually need to wait c. 2-3 weeks to get some effect. Of course, it depends on so many different factors(how cold the fridge is etc.) Sometimes, when I've left it out of the fridge, the organ-meat becomes too dried to become "high-meat" - I assume some humidity is required - wouldn't happen with liver, though, it's too soft.

I've tried raw liver as "high-meat" in the past, and it didn't turn out to be a success. By the time it was "high-meat-ripe" it was practically a liquid soup, and I can't face eating the stuff.

I found it much easier to use beef-/ox-heart or, to a lesser extent, ox-/beef-tongue instead, re high-meat.

Try the aged, raw liver for now anyway - it'll help you to get used to aged meat in general.

14717
General Discussion / Re: Aajonus Radio Interview
« on: September 19, 2008, 11:45:25 pm »
The host of oneradionetwork.com scheduled the interview on 2 different occasions and Aajonus either did not answer or the phone was busy.  Very disappointing to say the least and definitely the last time I will try to promote Aajonus to anyone.  I'll post the interview if it ever happens.          

That's odd - Aajonus is usually dead-keen on publicity of any kind. You contacted Aajonus via optimal@earthlink.net, I presume?

14718
General Discussion / Re: New to forum - Hello
« on: September 19, 2008, 06:24:47 pm »
There's a farm called Layer Marney farm, which seems alright:-

http://www.layermarneylamb.co.uk/

 They should do delivery(£9 per delivery is the usual charge for any package). I've seen them at farmers' markets. A whole leg of lamb is 18 pounds, a whole leg of mutton is c.13 to 14 pounds. Not bad, IMO - that's 1 to 2 days worth of food, depending on your appetite, and quite fatty, especially in the case of mutton.

Re raw butter:- I would suggest using raw eggs instead. One can't seem to get fertilised eggs in the UK, so you might want to heed the warnings by some RPDers re avidin, so you may want  to throw away most of the egg-white.

14719
Off Topic / Re: New Game
« on: September 19, 2008, 05:10:09 pm »
Brunette ... with blue eyes is wild!

Wine or beer?  :o

I never liked wine in my cooked-food days. On a rawpalaeo diet, I suspect that most wine is either preheated and, without question, filled with sulphites as a preservative - I have yet to come acros wine without sulphites.

Real Ale, is technically rawpalaeo-friendly as it's raw and is full of live, fermenting bacteria. The taste is much better than lager as well. However, alcohol, however raw, is toxic so I avoid alcohol with the exception of certain social occasions.

Give money to NASA or the 3rd world?


14720
Off Topic / Re: New Game
« on: September 19, 2008, 05:07:26 pm »
Hmm. Not sure. My younger years I would've definitely said right, but I've come to see the wonders of left as well.
You were talking about the entire "concept" of left and right, correct?

I was implying which did you favour more , the left or the right hand? No matter.


14721
Welcoming Committee / Re: solid foundation
« on: September 19, 2008, 05:03:58 pm »
There is a large difference between the abundance of paleo foods and junk foods. Saying that simply the abundance of food causes obesity and diabetes I don't agree with. I may be wrong, but no one's gonna get diabetes from eating too much raw meat.

People may not get diabetes from eating too much raw meat, but they can get other health-problems from eating too much. One of the major criticisms of the Primal Diet was that many people took literally Aajonus' instructions in his We Want To Live book(1997 edition) to eat dozens of small meals a day, involving a huge amount of food each day - as a result, many people(myself included) suffered from eating too much raw, lean muscle-meat, or excess amounts of other raw foods on the Primal Diet, such as raw honey. I was no exception, I found that constant digestion diverted resources from the rest of my body, thus lowering concentration, increasing fatigue etc. Another thing noticed by many RPDers is that fasting intensifies the healing process.

14722
Welcoming Committee / Re: solid foundation
« on: September 19, 2008, 04:53:48 pm »
If that is irrelevant, then why bring up junk-food in the first place which is obviously bad for you. That is not a point you're making.  That's your opinion.  We all know that too much of anything is bad for you.  Where have you proven that people are overeating just because they have an abundance of food? 
What premises would that be?

This discussion is going nowhere. It's a simple fact that the vast majority of Americans ARE overeating given the abundance of food. Not merely an opinion. And, as regards fasting, there are so many scientific studies proving the benefits re prolonged lifespan etc. for caloric restriction and Intermittent Fasting, that I really don't see the point in arguing about definitions of what fasting is or isn't.




14723
Welcoming Committee / Re: solid foundation
« on: September 19, 2008, 05:37:25 am »
So what goal did you achieve then, hum?  I bet when food was available, you eat and were happy.You said it right! ->  "makes it very tempting"  That does NOT mean people are or will overeat.  Now, you narrow it down to junk food instead of food in general.  Now admittedly I loathe junk food but even junk food is alright in the right portions.  The danger lies in consuming too much of it too often.


The goal is, of course, meaningless, as fasting or starving result in the same condition. As regards the issue of junk-food, sure a toxin in smaller amounts is less harmful than one in larger amounts, but that's irrelevant. You haven't answered my point that people link the overabundance of food to health-problems. This doesn't apply just to junk-food, anything eaten in excess is bad for you, there's a condition called hyponatraemia which is caused by drinking too much water. In short, most people tend to make greater use of resources when they're in abundance, this is only logical.

*Mind you, this is a pointless argument, as we're arguing from different premises/definitions*

14724
Welcoming Committee / Re: solid foundation
« on: September 19, 2008, 05:07:37 am »
What 'goal'?  When a person is starving they are not achieving any goal!  Have you ever been starving because you couldn't eat not because you choose not to eat?  Also, that statement is false.  Starving = lack of a sufficient food supply, fasting = there is sufficient food available but one chooses not to partake it.
Ridiculous.  How has the amount of food available related to disease?  I would think it's what you eat plus you can't assume that people are eating themselves to gluttony.

I've starved, years ago(during my student days), for days because I couldn't eat(I had no money whatsoever and was without other means/resources).
Re too much food:- It's a fact that too much food available makes it very tempting indeed  to overeat, thus leading to obesity, which leads to type 2 diabetes etc. etc. One only has to look at the US - Americans constantly refer to the ubiquity of fast-food restaurants everywhere selling junk-food in large, jumbo-sized portions, as being the primary  reason for the vast rise in obesity among US citizens since WWII.

14725
General Discussion / Re: What are you eating right now?
« on: September 19, 2008, 04:51:21 am »
That's true.  Since reading that, I have been just swallowing my food whole and it does save time.  Seems right as well, the animals I see on national geographic always gulf their food down as quickly as possible without chewing for the most part.

Re "eating":- I meant, of course , that I saved time by not chewing a lot, or preparing or cooking my foods(well, other than cutting with a knife). *

Pages: 1 ... 584 585 586 587 588 [589] 590 591 592 593 594 ... 612
SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk