Off Topic / Re: A sad riposte to the depopulation conspiracists here
« on: October 29, 2014, 03:17:25 pm »Well, I see your point in that most but not all species, however deadly, try to look after their young in some way so as to better spread their DNA. So, love thy neighbour could be seen as being a useful and indeed much-needed trait, it is just that I view it as being far less effective re survival than the survival of the fittest notion.No, you don't see the point, obviously never have either, for if you did you wouldn't write such apologetic nonsense trying to "excuse" yourself and thus avoid the issue. You do not see the point, so don't lie and say that you do. You don't, you don't even try.
Not once did I say anything specifically about the young. Plus, you are completely missing the point of "both are absolutely essential". Which one is more effective or stronger is 100% irrelevant.
I was trying to point out the flawed "reasoning" of yours by shedding directions from logic onto your nonsense and showing how you bring out things that are irrelevant and actually don't accord reality, but obviously you lack the faculties to notice this.
You've been posting such illogical and messed up nonsense here for quite some time now, and its not limited to just one or a few areas... you've got the world figured out into quite a mess in your mind. Would be nice if you noticed it yourself... I expect people to have at least some inkling of logic and "common sense", or such, but you persistently are avoiding those from coming into effect in yourself as you demonstrate through the nonsense you keep posting without correcting yourself. People correct their mistakes when they notice them - it's one aspect of who we are, we do not like to make mistakes if we can help it. So I suppose the problem might lie in "why can you not notice yourself"?
From someone who eats raw meat... I expect far more mentally, for one would not be so small and narrow and short minded for many obvious reasons (as in fact I see others here exhibit of not being). But you are anomalous, and not in any good way (far too many signs of actually being a "shill").
-------------------------------------
Anyway, on topic, the article is absolute nonsense for the obvious reason that it leaves out, well, everything actually relevant and actually truthful, and there's a lot of it.
World wars are not some "natural things that simply occur", they are all, each and every one, designed decades in advance with specific goals! If the goal is not population reduction by 90% or more, or whatever, then it won't happen either.