Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - nummi

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10
176
Take a human as an example and (assuming you could do it) envision that person in perfect condition (from life's perspective). Or something very close to it as some faults are already dictated by DNA (evolution/adaptation in progress). Then you actually look at that person and whatever does not fit the envisionment is a "disease".
Or just take a sick human and envision perfection, works the same really...

Inherently, no normal (I mean real normal) human is sick.
Well there's the mothers' diets... And damn... The sperm and the egg could as well be damaged by the parents diets and so the child is actually born inherently sick (or not?). Wouldn't make sickness right either way. The next generation even sicker, until extinction or evolution/adaptation catches up.
There are some that are genetically already messed up, like down syndrome and such. Perhaps that's evolution/adaptation trying to fit around grains (and others) and their effect on the brain? To sort of isolate the issue by finding a path around the cause? Even if true it wouldn't matter, evolution does not happen that fast. Extinction or "going back and to the side simultaneously" in evolution would come first (wait... this is what those with down syndrome look like... sort of... like an experiment gone wrong). (Loss in intelligence would be one effect, as have to compensate for the "rapid" changes from something? and what good of a mind you as good as can't use anyway?).
Have any such genetic "illnesses" been identified on bones predating the use of grains (and perhaps even cooking)? Because such genetic malformations make little to no sense. Evolution/adaptation would not happen like that unless there was a severe necessity or a "catalyst" of some kind; it would happen "slowly" without such severe hindrances to individual's life quality, because each individual is, potentially, responsible for the species' survival, which is potentially responsible for life's own survival. Such severe changes, to trigger such genetic changes, in the life of our species have only been in diet.

177
General Discussion / Re: As anyone went to a pet shop to eat an animal?
« on: February 21, 2014, 08:45:16 am »
Well... no of course. But you do know what they are fed there? I'd never eat a pet on such bad diet! Actually, I'd never eat a pet... Maybe.

This reminds me, I've seen some animal shelter series, or such, and they showed animals (cats and dogs mainly) who were so sick that they didn't even want to eat. But. What they gave them to eat were those crunchy things full of grain waste products and industry leftovers... no wonder they didn't want to eat! They'd have died even faster!

178
I tried frozen meat. I froze it myself, then unfroze it. Just to get to know the difference. I am never eating frozen meat again. It was that bad compared to the real thing. Although I dried some of it later and then I didn't notice as big a difference, compared to never frozen dried meat.

I don't think frozen meat is as bad as cooked, as the damage caused in the meat comes from frozen water that expands and destroys as a result. No new toxic substances are formed, unless they form from mechanical breaking. Cooking is far worse.
Then frozen animal fat shouldn't be that big an issue, as it doesn't have as much water in it as does meat.
Better frozen grass-fed than animal's raised in false conditions and on wrong diets.

There are farms everywhere, all kinds of animals really. At first glance it might seem like there's nothing, nowhere to get real meat from. They're sort of hidden, have to stumble onto them. Find a butcher or someone who deals with meat and ask them where to search for suppliers, as well a good place would be a farmers market or similar, just to get your nose in.
There should be farmers unions and such, contacting them should give leads. And hunters unions or such as well, to get leads on wild game.

Find a supplier of fresh quality meat, no matter how far from your home. Visit them once a month or so, if they are far away, and bring back a months worth of food, or more.

Eggs are one of the easiest and fastest to digest foods, and one of the most nutritious ones. With gut issues the easiest and fastest digestible foods should be the best option, they are metabolized fast so they stay in the gut the least. As a result healing should go faster. But individuals differ, so eggs might as well not be for everyone. Maybe you just need some time to adapt to raw eggs?
Fish are easy to digest too.
If you have problems with gut and digestion on cooked foods, and have actual serious damage caused while on that diet, then going raw is really the only option left. Removing the cause, or fixing the cause, will eventually remove the symptoms. Problems with digestion and gut are caused directly by false diet.

179
Pigs are harder to feed right, they are omnivores (similarly to us). Cattle is much easier, as they are herbivores (just grasses, leaves, etc.). But if you eat only quality foods then it shouldn't be an issue. "Parasites" aren't exactly parasites, most have a beneficial effect as well (removing toxins from our bodies, some even produce some beneficial substances?).

There is an adaptation period. It varies in symptoms and lengths from person to person. Stomach acid has to adapt, so does gut bacteria. There are detoxes your body will go through and damage that has to heal. Replacing weak molecules(?) Etc.
First time I tried raw beef fat I didn't shit for about 3 days, though after that it normalized. Was simply adapting to raw fat. As well had this light burning sensation in my stomach in the first months, now it's gone.

Different cuts from the same animal taste different, as taste different individual animals.

From animals I eat beef meat, fat, and some liver, mainly. No pork anything.
Even if something is claimed to be pasture raised, especially pigs and other animals with similar diets, it's best to do some research first (even go check the conditions the animals live in and what they are fed). Because some people do lie, and do claim this and that in total ignorance.

180
If you look at the Pottenger study,  think about a bit.   There are cats all around the world that never place a foot outdoors and Never eat anything but cooked food, that are able to reproduce easily.   I'm a raw food advocate all the way for my animals... but something doesn't add up here.
Cats from back then and now can be slightly different. There have been generations in between who've had time to adapt some bit to cooked food and other crap.

There's a cat here where I live. It is of a specific breed. It is a disgusting thing. In contrast, where my father works there are two cats, just normal cats, no bred things, they do eat all kinds of stuff, even processed crap, but they also catch mice and do get raw meat and fat. Difference between the the bred thing and those two cats is as good as absolute. The one in the house is broken in so many ways - doesn't eat right (not just what it eats but how it eats); eyes emit some crap; nasal passage problems; stench from the mouth; a canine is crooked; mood swings; asks for food all the time no matter that it doesn't need it, and then the food just sits and dries and once it's dried it won't eat it either way and still asks for more; sheds fur nonstop, all the time (seriously, sheep should be ashamed of themselves, producing so little!); doesn't even know how to shit right (for real), etc. It's a thing, not a cat, not even an animal, it's an abomination. It's been on processed crap since birth, and it was taken away from the mother far too early, perhaps two weeks old, morons... (doubtful being with the mother long enough could've changed much...).

The cat is not mine, I'm not responsible for it. My oldest brother's girl is the true "owner" and she completely believes the bullshit some "experts" say. So it is fed "food" full of grains and other industry leftovers and it is claimed to be "quality" food for cats, in fact the ingredients are listed on the package (I read them... the evidence to the cause of almost everything is right on the package of the "food"). There was a period when that grain crap was out, for about a week, and the thing improved significantly in every way, it even got some raw meat from me (absolutely loves raw meat). Then they bought more of that grain crap and fed more to it. I tried saying what the cause is but... the usual and expected response - total ignoration (this a word?). Everything's back to extremely bad. And now I'm done feeding it raw meat, not worth destroying my nerves and wasting good food. (They took the cat prematurely and then left it, in truth they haven't taken care of it as good as ever.)

Pottenger's cats were in controlled environments. House cats are not, not all. If they can get outside they can and will catch at least bugs and eat them, and nibble on grass stalks occasionally. That reminds, the broken thing loves being outside during summer days, even whole days straight, no wonder why - all kinds of bugs, and it does eat them.
The "wilder" the worse and faster the effect will be. They can survive processed foods if they can get raw foods enough from time to time. But just as humans, so are animals on a wrong diet, as sick.

So there's some adaptation to processed stuff on breeds. But if you take real cats then they actually would die out when subjected to only processed foods for generations. For undamaged and unaltered animals raw food is an absolute necessity.

181
Raw Weston Price / Re: Unrefined Salt Experiments
« on: February 16, 2014, 09:36:54 am »
Been making glasses of salt water for some days as well. Feel somewhat better if I drink some throughout the day. If enough diluted, but not too much, I find it rather palatable. I don't measure how much, I just put some salt into one glass, pour water in, taste it, if too salty take another glass and pour some in there and dilute it till it tastes right.

182
Journals / Re: Once I realized being "normal" is being ill.
« on: February 16, 2014, 09:29:49 am »
Damn... the heart thing I had fits so well with dilated cardiomiopathy and especially congestive heart failure... The symptoms were perfectly spot on.
Got another look at it when reading http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyponatremia A cause to that is listed as congestive heart failure. As well hypothyroidism, I definitely had far too little iodine. And many symptoms for hyponatremia I had as well. I was really fvkced up. Weird how symptoms of one are the symptoms of another. Coincidence? No. More like one underlying cause and a plethora of symptoms.
It's kind of stupid to label a clump of symptoms with one name and another clump with another name when the underlying cause and cure for them all is the same. The cause is simply the lack of something essential, in most cases, and everything else is the symptom, and some symptoms can act as causes leading to further ones (I suppose that's one where confusion comes in, they become fooled by body's reactions and "treat" the wrong thing, thinking it is the underlying cause when in truth it is just symptom creating another symptom). Not me of course, I didn't go to doctors at all.

About a month ago went to have a blood test taken. Mainly to have my parents stop nagging, and oh how they stopped...
Results came back as expected, everything just "perfect"...

At least it's much much better now. Next week, or whenever snow will be gone enough, I'll try some running, up to 30 min. As I can already do exercises with extra weight that get my heart bumping without any issues.
Has improved unexpectedly fast. A few more months, perhaps 2, at this rate.

Finally can even continue doing my studying. Creative writing of quality stories (primarily sci fi and fantasy) the goal. And whatever is needed for it. Will even include drawing pictures from imagination to improve the details of scenes I conjure in my mind. All in English.. which isn't my native tongue.

Found a meat supplier too, about 5 weeks ago. Beef. That's nice. Funny how have to sort of stumble on it to find it where on first glance seems like nothing's there.

183
General Discussion / Re: Fat to Protein Ratio Ready Made Chart
« on: February 16, 2014, 05:06:19 am »
Why would the ratio be so relevant? I've never cared for it, still don't, don't see a need for it. And honestly, there is no need for it. Go back even a hundred years and I doubt you'll find protein to fat ratio being mentioned anywhere.
What matters is quality of the meat.

184
Don't forget vegetarianism... this crap is often in mass media depicted as very positive for health. Sure, might work for some very very few individuals. Or against some certain health issues as a one time treatment, or such. But otherwise... seriously...

Humans will last longer than those cats did, because we have experience of thousands of years with cooked foods. But now there's all this... everything that's labeled as safe and normal that in reality is anything but. Have it all put on top of cooked foods and you end up worse than dead. I presume three or four more generations of this soup of crap and then it'll be here in full effect.

The best example of a collapse of civilization would the Mayan one. There are caves there that have pottery and such stuff in them that could only have gotten there if those caves weren't under water, and such times were about 15 000 years ago (wasn't the last ice age, or something similar, still going on that long ago?). As well there are very very many ruins of towns, averaging around 2 or 3 square kilometers, in the forests there, all thousands of years old. So what happened there? No one knows.
Considering the amount of towns the population must have been immense, far too high to be sustainable with their level of knowledge and society and civilization as a whole, the reason it all failed. Right now we are at a similar state - our global population is by about 4, even 5, billions too high, and our present knowledge that moves around in those masses, which in truth is made of almost only lies and delusions, cannot and will not sustain such numbers.
A collapse will, it has to, come again. A new beginning is needed. A dead end has been reached. Right now its just dragging on.

A course correction is needed if one is reached. Where is one? It's been years, decades even. All the while everything is getting worse. They say the people have the power, yet nothing is done against the rulers if they repeatedly make things worse. Because the people themselves don't know what to do, and those rulers come from the people - a dead circle before it began.
Negativity promotes thinking, justice, as well negative qualities but they don't tend to survive either way. This mess we are in makes many of us actually smarter - we see how matters must not be and we are far more prone to live by that which would be better. Those who are smart enough have to simply survive the collapse and then assume leadership, by whatever means necessary. Generations would be raised with newer and better values. Until it either reaches another end and collapse, or they will be smart enough to foresee it and course correct themselves.

Religion has been an extremely negative influence. Those who spoke out, in the past, the medieval and such times, were branded as heretics, witches, warlocks, and whatever else, just to remove them permanently. They were killed. Potential was killed on purpose, because they were right, they had the right. Religion still is a major issue everywhere, in regards to eventual consequences, because it has an extremely strong tendency to keep people very stupid and blind.

Dead ends. As an example, Soviet era reached one as well. It collapsed. Countries were "freed", they assumed new courses - true capitalism - sort of moved on for a while. But. They have reached yet another end. A new course correction is needed, but all they do instead is follow money even though it gets them absolutely nowhere. Because money has reached it's own dead end as well. A new course is needed already on that level, and the only one is one without.
The same goes about so many values, globally - dead ends - traditions, faiths, patriotism, nationalism, getting "paid" for a job, teaching to follow rules instead of teaching to think independently, etc.
Presently they all just drag onward toward nothing.
If a dead end is reached, anything that gives a direction, a nudge in any direction, is usually embraced with a broad smile. Because it's better than not moving at all. If only they put, if only they could, a little realistic thought into anything...

It will come. People will die, they would have to one way or another - there are far too many - things have gone too far already for "peaceful" and "ethical" alternatives.

Those who know and live and eat as a true human are inherently apt to better awareness. When shit hits the fan it's best to get out of the way and just let it happen, or it will blow you away with the rest.

Until then all you can really do is your best educating people about the state of our society, and what is really going on. Even create "groups" for better support and helping, make events where you talk to others, get public as best you can, etc. Most importantly teach what is food and what is not. And just hope, because there still is potential.

185
Off Topic / Re: Primeval code
« on: February 12, 2014, 08:03:04 pm »
"Ciba has given up by now all these studies, there have been no further scientific work undertaken in this area because they can not be assigned to one of the priority research areas of the company. For this reason, the research industry in many, many interesting approaches in exploratory projects will be dropped. "
Doesn't take even quarter of a brain cell to realize this is total grain-fed bullshit. If a discovery like this is made the company's priority research will change, or will be made a new team of researchers who continue in the discovery's direction either by the same company or some other.

And "patenting"... well...
"I developed a new way of moving my arm, I'll patent it. Anyone who moves his/her arm the same way I will sue and dry 'em of all they got!" This is what patenting is.

The only reason, if it is true, it wasn't continued is that they were payed off or threatened by those with lots and lots of money to avoid themselves from going bankrupt and losing all their idiotic obsessions dictate.

186
Off Topic / Re: Primeval code
« on: February 12, 2014, 07:45:30 pm »
If this is true it wouldn't be the first time extremely useful technology and knowledge is buried and as good as never seen from again. And each time this occurred the new technology and knowledge would have bankrupted/destroyed oil industry and "food" industry, or any massive industries/corporations. For example, successful electric cars have been invented many times, and each time the technology is buried and kept away from public (one such occurrence - re-invention - was in Finland, if I remember correctly; and I read from somewhere years back that first car engines were electric). Everything is opted to making more money (which is translated into power via ignorance of the people) for the "rulers" without paying attention to true consequences, as a result the whole humanity suffers.

I've heard/read stories about Nicola Tesla, or whoever it was, coming up with a way of transmitting electricity with no wires (which was again (re-)invented just several years ago...)? And that it never was made real. We still use mostly wires, just wondering if it was true and if so then would that generated wireless field as well had been with no current? And some years ago there moved stories that cellphones could be recharged using the same waves/field that come from cellphone towers...

Ain't life on Earth just wonderful?

187
Off Topic / Re: Landmark anti-GM case
« on: February 12, 2014, 03:25:05 am »
Quote
Prices are based on yield/farmer's cost of living. In other words if a farmer uses some sort of chemical yield enhancer, he gets more yield and so to earn an appropriate amount of money to live on a farmer who doesn't use the enhancing chemicals needs to make more per item. So each individual item costs more. The person must also be rewarded for this extra effort to be encouraged to continue, otherwise, he would just go the easy route.
This is an example of how messed up modern society is. No farmer should be forced, by dictates of capitalism and the greed of "rulers", to use anything more than what is naturally available, to be able to live well. Everyone should have natural foods available to them to the extent they are needed, not chemical grown crap.
That they are forced to ask higher prices has nothing to do with them or their field of occupation. Other than not acting out and not forcing morons with their idiotic ideas out of rulership, because they are threatened by previously made up laws and fines and arrests and such.

My point is that there are "food" items, heavily processed ones, that are far cheaper than the raw and unprocessed variants, I have personally seen this (although don't remember what items specifically).
In this case, the higher numbers would be more processed than the lower ones. The point is that the more something is processed the more thought and effort is put into it and so the more it should cost.

Quote
It takes a lot of thought and effort to grow a food without some form of chemistry involved. That is why the chemistry sets were invented in the first place.
It takes a lot of thought if you think it does, or you don't know what you should be doing. Effort it takes about as much in both cases.

Quote
You cannot blame the farmer. You can only blame yourself. Untill you grow the balls to go out and farm yourself, you are partly to blame.
Depends on the farmer.
Blame myself for something I am not responsible for? Why would I? Did I set matters the way they are presently, do I keep them?

Partly to blame? While I have nothing to do with it? Uhm... no. I am not to blame even the tiniest bit.
If I were a farmer I wouldn't be to blame for anything. Because I don't set the rules and ways everyone seems so content to follow, unfortunately.
I'll do my best against idiocies ruling humanity but I alone can change nothing.

188
Off Topic / Re: Landmark anti-GM case
« on: February 11, 2014, 11:58:52 pm »
And then no doubt 1s and 2s get the highest prices. Doesn't matter the fact that those products, compared to all the rest, require the least work done on them.

It's really fucked up... seeing how that which is the healthiest requires the least amount of work and also is priced the highest, and that which requires lots of work and processing is the cheapest.
Isn't something that gets more and more processed and has more and more work done on it, supposed to be the most expensive? And yet that's not so when it comes to foods sold in most all shops. People would be forced to buy crap against their own will even if they knew how messed up everything is, or a world revolution would come to be. It's like people are intentionally kept away from eating healthy and thus being healthy, and knowing how matters really are.

The worse the health the more people will propagate. Makes sense, the species has to adapt, and the only way to successfully do it to accord new conditions is through evolution. The faster and more they get children the faster the species adapts to new conditions.
And what is most of humanity ever more subjected to? To conditions that can only exist by having them created by manipulating our world, conditions that naturally do not and cannot exist. If this process were to be completed, and then some of those people were put into natural conditions, without having any way of getting or them producing that processed crap, they would all die. Even now there are people who have trouble eating natural untainted foods without some issues, and neither can they function right on processed crap.

189
Off Topic / Re: Landmark anti-GM case
« on: February 11, 2014, 07:29:27 pm »
"Organic" as good as means nothing. Would be nice if food had "raw paleo grade" on it... cannot attach idiotic regulations and rules on that label, it either is or not.

190
Hot Topics / Re: Zero Carb and VLC/Ketogenic - A Lethal Recipe for Disaster
« on: February 08, 2014, 06:37:44 am »
Isn't toxicity and lethality based on a person on a version of SAD diet?
Very much possible that which a SAD dieter finds far too toxic, perhaps even lethal, in our case could have some beneficial effect (if aside toxicity any at all), or aid against some illness or such, as we are in a better overall condition and better equipped against such effects in general. (Not into experimenting this...)
There are berries that are toxic, but then aren't berries supposed to be, evolutionarily speaking, food for animals (to spread the seeds)? Why else would they have flesh around the seeds?

191
General Discussion / Seaweeds, self harvesting, Baltic sea
« on: February 05, 2014, 04:55:02 am »
Are all seaweeds edible? Where do they specifically grow, and how far and in how deep water? When what kind are in season (if they have these) and are some available during winter?
I will go check the shores myself anyway but I'm waiting for winter to pass and would very much like to know what I'll be getting myself into.
What to look for and where.

I'd rather harvest myself without paying for something I could potentially get for free with the expense of seeing and touching nature.

Interested especially in the ones in the Baltic sea, as I actually live about 30 km from the shoreline.

192
Journals / Re: PaleoPhil's Journal
« on: February 02, 2014, 12:34:37 am »
"Decadence" fits as well, somewhat at least.

193
Journals / Re: PaleoPhil's Journal
« on: February 01, 2014, 01:36:56 am »
I regard degradation as something getting worse compared to a previous state. Dictionary says basically the same.
But it's true it's not exactly what you want, degradation has this other "flavor" to it.
Mistake is just one instance, degradation can include many mistakes.

I've noticed myself as well that for many notions there simply are no words made for. Language fails the mind, so have to play with context, and perhaps add some further sentences to make the point clearer, or give a rough direction and hope for comprehension.

194
Journals / Re: PaleoPhil's Journal
« on: January 31, 2014, 09:56:58 pm »
Degradation seems to fit, at least somewhat, as opposed to progress.

195
Welcoming Committee / Re: New User, but been on Paleo a while.
« on: January 31, 2014, 09:53:53 pm »
That which you eat raw eat raw; that which you cook, instead dry first and then eat, no cooking that way. They shouldn't be squeamish about dried meat as fish are dried all the time without anyone nagging about it, and dried meat is delicious.
It's winter here (where I am), cold outside, so the heating makes the air inside dry and under the ceiling warmer than down below. I have on a shelf, on a grate-like thingy (originally came with a microwave), pieces of meat just sitting on it. They dry fast, a whole day and they look shriveled up and dark dark brown, closing to black, and taste really good. If I could I'd make a photo of it, the view is that good.

196
Hot Topics / Re: Fukushima and California
« on: January 29, 2014, 04:16:54 pm »
I'm still around, but am bored by this place and the bulk of its inhabitants, most of you are a waste of this gift. What I would like is to have every post I've ever contributed here erased, as well as my other account. However, barring that, I will simply disappear.

With that said, I seem to be as invincible as ever, I will gladly report if/when that changes, still have not met a microbe I would not call 'Friend'. My life is a fairytale, a pleasant dream, I've me the girl of my dreams, she is 110% on board with RVAF, I don't have a health concern in the world, I'm financially set and I'm so incredibly happy, happier than I've ever been or ever thought I could be. My only wish for this board, is that those of you with severely warped perspectives on how health works and the nature of 'reality' might come to a more accurate understanding of these things. I will continue to monitor the boards from time to time but that will be the extent of my participation unless something interesting happens. Keep on being mediocre guys, or maybe don't. =)
Lovely attitude...

You can't expect every single person to be the same, not physically, not mentally! If you do, as you are reflecting, then you have a lot to learn.

It does affect the mind what a person eats, but it's not the whole truth. Meaning if one eats right, or as close to it as can, does not immediately translate into mental awareness of the same extent.

Mediocre in what scale, in comparison to what exactly?

I'd say you are in the top when it comes to diet (I don't know for certain of course) but not anywhere near the top when it comes to mental condition.

And very nice of you to bash, without giving specific examples why you disagree and what you think would be correct.

197
Quote
Maybe your fellow people are eating well, but not mine.  So I have to stress my disagreement with Denise' alleged statement that "eating patterns play a minority" role.

If you and Denise really believe that quote then you and her should go back to SAD.
I can vouch for that. I ate my whole life a version of a SAD diet. While on that diet I began concentrating more on my own health, what I ate, physical exercise, etc., years like that. I had trouble with matters and I didn't even know why it was or what exactly was wrong. About some aspects I thought "it's the way I am" - thought it was normal. Things got real bad, tired from the moment I woke up till bed-time and months like this, then came the heart problem, lack of iodine hit, spleen as well when I think back now, etc. Then I went raw, noticed myself healing, noticed parts of me healing I didn't even know were wrong or damaged.
If diet plays so little then why did everything begin getting better once I went raw? Diet was really the only major difference I made... aside what my new health issues demanded.

Everything depends on what you eat, it's the foundation of your life. If it is wrong then so are you.

198
General Discussion / Re: Fantastic Health Benefits of Butyrate
« on: January 27, 2014, 02:58:10 pm »
"There's also the possibility of ferments not doing so well because they need an aerobic environment,"  l) Uh? Nice vocab. lol

"I wonder what it would be like if it was hung as it would be to make aged meat, only in conditions that would make high meat (ie. the temperature). " Oh my GOD! Way to butcher the English language. lol.   l)
Nice immaturity... You are obviously a troll. If not then come back once you've fixed your issues.

199
Hot Topics / Re: Intensive farming in the UK.
« on: January 25, 2014, 10:02:41 pm »
Couldn't read the whole thing, something got in the way... 70 billion farm animals??? 90 percent farmed plants (or was that just about grains) are fed to them??

Those 70 billion could easily be fit on that 90 percent grain land (after grains are killed of course)... they'd be able to move around, be in the open air, get sun... So wtf?!?!?! On top of all that, leaving aside all other flaws and wrongs, how much animal product (not shit...) is wasted?
The pollution from agriculture and pollution from mega-farms would stop with one blow, accompanied by significant increase in food's overall quality to all sides, accompanied yet again by the redundancy of antibiotics and other chemicals fed to animals.

How wonderful present reality is... for fuck's sake...

Seriously, someone must kill the morons, the capitalist (primarily) idiots, who keep things so fucked up!

200
General Discussion / Re: Two questions! (buying and washing)
« on: January 22, 2014, 11:44:40 pm »
Yes, I understood that. But frozen food thawed before ingestion proved troublesome, so we (the people having been successfully eating 100% raw paleo during several decades in Europe) don't eat thawed food... and eating frozen food is quite impractical!

Yes, that's true too.
I eat them frozen, perhaps a handful at a time and not often. Sometimes let them be for a little while before eating, so they become less cold but still frozen. I used to eat ice-cream a lot before going raw, without issues (that I could notice).
As to eating frozen being impractical, I've heard some berries can be found during winter and frozen, in the forest. From my parents and grandparents, but that was years ago (if I remember correctly).
I don't think eating frozen foods is as impractical in northern regions with long and freezing winters.
Drying them should be relatively easy, as an alternative.

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10
SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk