Calm down tyler and stop with the attacks, please. I can assure you I am not a troll lol.
So your first link I have definitely never seen before and is pretty interesting, boiled meats do seem to be somewhat high at first glance. The problem is that raw meat already has a decent amount of AGE content for some reason, raw chicken for example is 700 and boiled is 950(compared to 5000 for roasted).
Plant foods on the other hand have negligible amounts with boiled potatoes coming in at 17, this was what I was really interested in because cooked meat has other greater problems besides AGEs so the AGE content doesn't necessarily matter too much(to me at least).
Your second link is pretty classic, especially considering that you are calling me stupid. Its a study done on mice with refined AGEs, you seriously think that is equal to a study done on healthy humans? If there are studies done on relatively healthy humans show them, otherwise stop with the attacks.
I'm a liar because I realize that these studies aren't absolute and can be wrong? Ok... You need to chill out dude, your dogma with this AGE thing is beyond insane. No need to attack me over it lol, I'm actually trying to learn as hard as that may be to believe

Again diabetic patients aren't representative of healthy humans, just because a diabetic patient is worse off doesn't mean anything for healthy people. With that being said so far everything you posted has not proven that AGE are a problem for healthy people or that health problems reduce when AGEs are eliminated.
Before you ban me or attack me anymore let me make it clear that I don't even eat foods with AGEs for the most part and I think they may be a causal factor in some diseases but your weak studies you parade around don't show much, they definitely don't show
Dietary AGEs being the villain you make them ut to be.