Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Guittarman03

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10
101
Carnivorous / Zero Carb Approach / Re: Zero carb Euphoria
« on: June 19, 2009, 02:21:15 pm »
1st time, almost a year ago.  For a solid 2 weeks the most carbs I had was maybe a couple strawberries every day.  That's like 4g carbs.  I didn't even know there were zero carbers out there, nor was I aware of the back and forth in the various caveats of RP.  Just tinkering. 

Anyways, my breath started to smell pretty awful.  My digestive system started to back up, but I would have diarhea.  I was losing energy and feeling lousy.  Came home from work one day feeling particularly terrible, and had a craving for berries and honey (I never have had a sweet tooth, and didn't really crave sweets during the zc trial until then), so I decided it was my body talking to me.  I loaded up on some choice berries / honey, and IMMEDIATELY felt satisfied and better.  My digestive tract loosened up, and I started to feel warm (beginnings of fever).  I had a fever that night, and got up about 4 times to take a crap, but each time I woke up I felt better.  By morning both my fever and diahrea had subsided.  I felt better than I had in quite a few days.  I added a few carbs back in for the next few days, but kind of slipped in to VLC soon after (maybe 10-15g carbs every day?) w/o quite realizing it, just kind of habit from the last couple weeks.  I started to get some of the same symptoms again - to a lesser extent - so I added some carbs and problem solved.  I had a dental checkup about 1/2 way through this ordeal (which was about 4-5 weeks all together), and found out that for the FIRST time in my life, I had cavities.  I chose not to get them filled.

Now from about February - April this year, I was doing very low carb, about 30g per day.  Then I decided there wasn't really much difference between 30 and 0, and was considering some of the possibilities of growth hormone response, so I figured I'd try zc again, but after about 5 days, again w/ the bad breath.  I was also starting to feel odd, not bad really, just not right, it's difficult to explain.  So I can go a few days pure meat (I do it fairly often nowadays), but I've gotta get some carbs in or my health declines. 

That's the experience of it for me, w/o any attempt to 'bash' zc.  I'm glad that other zc'ers have found a diet that improves their health, and are experimenting and contributing to the community through the study of a particular caveat of RP.   

---
I will however 'bash' the way you chose to respond:

I was talking about candida and dental health in relation to carbohydrates.  I was talking about gluconeogenesis, sharing my experience with RP re 'mouth health,' and asking some valid questions.  You absolutely failed to respond to me in a way that speaks to the information/questions presented; opting instead to take the easier road of 'bashing,' while simultaneously accusing me of the same. 

Why the tendancy to be so defensive?  To stifle dissent?  Yes I've got some differences of opinion, but discussion/debate is a great way to gain new knowledge and refine those opinions, as long as we stay on topic...       

     

102
Carnivorous / Zero Carb Approach / Re: Zero carb Euphoria
« on: June 19, 2009, 12:03:01 pm »
Your body produces carbs out of protein and fat.  Doesn't this mean that it is impossible to rid your body of carbs?  I have also read on the zero carb forums that sugars are the only thing bacteria can feed on to cause cavities; yet I have never had a cavity in my entire life... until I tried zc.  They shrunk and I only have one small dot on my back right molar now... after I added carbs again.

I guess I'm just not sold on the candida issue being inherently related to carbs. 

103
I sleep on the floor with a few blankets and that's it.  I try to sleep and wake with the sun, and I too quit wearing sunglasses.  I've read that glasses force your vision into a narrow field of view, cutting off your peripheral.  This strains your eyes and actually contributes to poor eyesight.  In fact, I skimmed through a book where this optometrist claimed to be able to correct eyesight over time through some simple eye exercises.  I can't remember his name.     

104
Exercise / Bodybuilding / Re: Injury Recovery
« on: June 16, 2009, 01:23:52 pm »
"Egoscue Method of Health Through Motion"  -by Pete Egoscue
Check it out on Amazon.com.  It's cheap, and the information it has will help heal and prevent injury for the rest of your life.  He has another book called "Pain Free," but it's not nearly as effective as the other one.

105
Exercise / Bodybuilding / Re: awesome Crossfit workout.
« on: June 16, 2009, 01:12:56 pm »
No one needs to eat any fruits and vegetables for nutrients.  In fact, fruits and veg increase your needs for some nutrients like vitamin c. 
No one?  What about Tyler?  What about myself?  What about Angelo?  How is it that you scold Tyler ...
  don't pretend that you have any iota of knowledge what it feels like to perform at any sport while zero carb.  And don't discount those of us who do! 
telling him not to discount your experiences, but practically in the same breath assert that no one needs to eat fruit/veg?

Apparently there is something in fruits/veg that I need, or else I lose energy, get steadily reducing desire for meat, and develop cavities.  And just how/why do fruits veg increase your need for vit c?  That doesn't really pass the smell test.

Are you trying to say that if you eat 100% cooked meat that you have no need for vit c? 
How much of your diet is raw, and how much is cooked?  Last I heard from you, it was about 75% raw, with some light cooked in addition.  I would agree that some people can do zc on a majority raw diet, but you can't do it on a complete cooked meat diet w/o developing nutrient deficiencies  ... eg scurvy.

I don't doubt that you are doing well on zc.  My guess is that your body is highly keto adapted, and rate of gluconeogenesis (glucose synthesis from protein) is very high.  From your workout regimine, it looks like you tend towards endurance type activities (jogging, martial arts teaching/training for 2 hrs), as opposed to seriously intense (like the two posted videos).  That's not to slam how you train, I know I can't put a kick over my cranium like you can, but many people doing intense training to full anaerobic capacity (repeated nearing or achieving muscle failure) will be benefitted by consuming carbs to replace lost glycogen. 

I can speak from experience, I have tried both near zc (less than 30g a day for months) and carb loading.  While I did just fine on very low carb, my strength gains tended to be slower.  If I was doing something like tennis, with some jogging and minor weightlifting, I think I would adapt well, and get better at the game, b/c much like martial arts, so much is in technique, precision, and timing. 

But if I'm going for raw gains in muscle strength and mass, I'll avoid jogging and endurance sports, and take some carbs b/c of the anabolic nature of insulin.


ps - I am speaking only about achieving effects in the body via targeted exercise and diet.  I'm not too concerned (in this thread) about the 'paleoness' of the types of exercises we are discussing.




106
General Discussion / Re: Diabetes
« on: June 12, 2009, 09:27:05 am »
That's pretty interesting Lex.  So your body takes over 1/2 of your protein and converts to glucose?  I have to ask though, why not just eat some carbs, if you're going to get a blood sugar response anyways?  What's the biological difference between eating some carbs and having carbs synthesized from protein and fat?  Other than the obvious digestive differences.

Our bodies have to have insulin.  It's the fundamental hormone for pretty much all life on the planet, and is key for almost every metabolic process in our bodies, even if in small amounts.  Greater insulin sensitivity means that less insulin is required to achieve the same effect, but no insulin means we die.  Agreed that most of us have too much though.   

107
Exercise / Bodybuilding / Re: awesome Crossfit workout.
« on: June 12, 2009, 08:45:28 am »
I don't do crossfit per say, but I like to do functional, multiple large muscle group movements at least once a week.  I never really had many problems with zero carb when lifting, but I never did combine the two for that long either, 3 - 5 days at most.  After that my health starts declining on zero carb, regardless of working out or not.   After experimenting with cyclical carb loading the past few weeks (vs low carb all the time for a few months), I've got to say that it seems carbs can be used strategically to see some good results.

I'm fairly convinced that to be more than your casual athlete or weekend warrior, you need to consume some carbs.  If you're going for the longer slower endurance stuff, high fat is probably the better way to go, as you're not really tapping into your glycogen reserves and keto-adaption will provide the long steady state energy you need.  But guys that get in to really high intensity stuff (like crossfit), need the immediate energy that carbs provide (glycogen).

Quite a few zero carbers would debate this, citing growth hormone response, and gluconeogenesis.  But there is a limit to how much glycogen can be synthesized from protein and fat, and I don't think it is enough to meet the body's potential after a serious glycogen depleting workout.  I suspect that the longer recovery time on zero carb may be related to the time (and unnecessary energy) it takes to replenishment glycogen via glucose synthesis.  Why use your dietary proteins to go through a complex process of synthesizing carbs when you can just consume them directly?

Protein / fat ratio depends on the person, and even on the season.  I eat much less fat now that summer is here, but in the winter I can hardly get enough.  Extra fat will tend to keep the weight on, whereas less fat extra protein will help you shed a few pounds, so it depends on your goals.  Eat animal fat, grassfed if possible.  It is more filling and has more energy than extracted oils.  There are other benefits over extracted oils, but I'm not savvy on them; Tyler or Lex can speak to the reasons much better than me. 

Last, if you are eating primarily cooked zero carb, you need the nutrients and benefits of fruits/veg.  You don't need to eat tons, really no more than 35% of your calories, but you really won't be doing your body any favors by zc unless it's raw (even then you may not be able to keep it up). 



108
Health / Re: migraines caused by high carb?
« on: June 11, 2009, 09:04:12 am »
Guys, I think we're missing the larger picture here:

Again, excess carbs (the kind you get from potatoes, bread, rice, etc) leads to insulin resistance, which causes overproduction of insulin, which causes overproduction of cholesterol, thickening of the smooth muscle cells in the arteries, depositing of more and more fat in fat cells, overworking the heart, a pancrease with decreased function, etc REGARDLESS of whether or not your meat is cooked.  So when you take away the carbs even on a cooked meat diet, you are reducing that response and regaining insulin sensitivity which WILL improve health and longevity overall.  I'm almost positive that's why calorie restricting diets (in general) have shown to lead to longer life span - you have taken away the insulin response (in addition to reducing the amt of toxins from cooked meat). 

If you go to zero or almost zero carb on a cooked meat diet, you are losing out on vitamin C (which you need on a cooked diet), potassium, and I'm sure a few other minerals/nutrients.  Thus the need for fruits and veggies if eating cooked meat.  Even if you're eating raw, many (not all) people still need some carbs to maintain health. 

Now if you go the other way and take out the cooked meat in favor of vegetarianism, you suddenly give your body a chance to rid itself of all those heat induced toxins from protein and fat.  Of course your health stats will go up and you will feel invigorated - at least for awhile. 

The problem is the body ultimately NEEDS animal protein and and fat, even if adulterated by cooking.  So vegetarians eventually decline in health.  Although years of eating cooked meat (especially if overcooked) will also lead to health problems, if I had to eat a cooked diet, I would take moderately cooked meat on the moderately low carb paleo plan over cooked vegetarianism any day.... even though as a RPer I generally make my cheats in the direction of cooked, even non-paleo carbs. 

Why the seeming oxymoron?

b/c it's a different conversation as you move towards the raw meat end of the spectrum.  You're body is now under the influence of fewer toxins, and it's operating more efficiently wrt digestion and utilization of animal food sources.  Introducing cooked meat to such a system is akin to taking poison + food ::  now your body (used to high quality octane) has to remove all this crap, which causes a a cascade of reactions to eliminate those toxins, often accompanied by unpleasant symptoms.  However, even cooked carbs still end up as just glucose.  This is not toxic (unless you're a diabetic with ketoacidosis), and is easily handled by your pancrease with insulin.

The big picture:

--High carbs, even raw paleo carbs, cause insulin resistance over the course of YEARS, not hours or days. 
--Vegetarianism, whether raw or cooked, leads to insulin resistance and nutrient deficiency
--Cooked meat leads to a toxic body, and combined with very low carb leads to nutrient deficiency; however,
--Cooked meat for non-raw paleo-eaters is essential for health.  They may want to consider eating more fruits/veggies and nuts than their raw counterparts, and even some low temp extracted oils from fatty plant sources (olives, nuts, coconut, avocado), but not vegetable and highly processed oils.  These are not ideal for raw paleo'ers.

--Cooked meat for RPers is like taking poison + food, and thus, from a chemical standpoint, it's probably healthier to have the occasional cooked carb (sans any processed/cooked fat) than cooked meat.
--Raw or cooked meat, you probably should get no more than 1/4-1/3 of your calories from carbs.

109
There probably is a certain amount of truth to this.  I have read that long distance aerobics can hinder your strength gains in the gym.  I'm pretty sure it's related to catabolic hormones that consume your tissues for energy, though I would suspect this greatly reduced in a low carber who is in ketosis. Long distance exercising below about your 70% max is effective for fat burning but not necessarily for cardiovascular training improvements.  It probably is less harmful for muscle building, whereas above 70% is good for cardio improvement, but probably eats in to the lifting some. 

So I guess the answer is, it depends.  If you do it for a short warmup/cooldown, and not at very high intensity, you're probably okay.  But if you are getting in to that cardio training zone and doing this for any more than 10 mins after a workout, you're probably sacrificing some muscle.  I have also read that even if you do cardio on your days off from lifting, it can eat in to your gains. 

110
Health / Re: migraines caused by high carb?
« on: June 09, 2009, 09:24:43 am »
ps:  glucose itself does not cause direct damage to the body, whereas toxins and altered fats do. 

111
Health / Re: migraines caused by high carb?
« on: June 09, 2009, 09:17:45 am »
Exercise most certainly DOES help improve overall health, whether you're RP or not.  It helps to increase insulin sensitivity (which inevitably tends to decline with age).  It keeps your muscles and tendons strong and flexible, helps keep your joints functional.  It induces increased production of testosterone and growth hormone which help maintain youth and vigor.  It helps to keep you strong and keep your bones dense for those times when you have to lift and move stuff (thus helping to prevent injury).  It helps keep your cardiovascular system strong.  There are numerous studies demonstrating increased mental acquity and capacity in those that exercise vs those that do not; and even more compelling are studies indicating that physcial activity has effects on childrens' performance on intelligence exams. 
   -- "but look at elite athletes and their average longevity, it's much shorter than the average person."  A poor argument:  athletes often take performance enhancing drugs above the norm- which are not longevity increasing.  But I will give you this:  If you are an elite type athlete, even on RP, I would suspect a somewhat shorter life b/c your body has spent a lot of it's energy on growth and metabolism.  From what I understand, cells can only divide so many times before they are spent.  But the differences that occur in the body as a result of moderate exercise promotes longevity, and more importantly, quality of life. 
   --"athletes die of heart attacks and cancer all the time."  No one said exercise was a 100% way to never have that happen no matter how you eat.   

Cooked fat vs cooked carbs:  There are so many different types of fat, essential, non-essential, 6 and 3s, and on.  Many of these are used for very specific functions and are most effectively utilized when in their pure and unadulterated state.  Fats' composition is corrupted by heat - the amount of heat necessary to chemically alter depends on the fat, but these alterations leave many compounds in the product that negatively affect the health of the body.  This is in addition to the bio-chemical differences induced by the altered fats themselves.  Carbs however, even when cooked, by and large end up as glucose in the blood stream.  Sugars aren't as affected by heat, they tend to just remain sugars.  I'm sure there are likely toxins in cooked fruits/veggies as well,  but I'm guessing they are MUCH fewer than in fats.  Both products have a loss of nutrients and enzymes. 

Now both cooked fats and excess carbs (cooked or not) will contribute to heart disease.  I'm not sure the mechanism by which fats contribute (Tyler seems to have done a lot of study on AGEs and other toxins), but the mechanism by which excess carbs do the same thing is insulin resistance.  I won't get into all of it here, but obesity, high/bad cholesterol, diabetes, all have a root in insulin resistance, which occurs b/c of the overconsumption of carbs.

So everyone has their differing views on where we make our 'cheats' but for these reasons, I generally make my cheats in the direction of cooked, sometimes even non-paleo carbs, since insulin resistance takes years to develop, and I can mitigate the effects anyways with strength training.  I still try to separate them from meat due to the digestive issues when combining.

112
Health / Re: migraines caused by high carb?
« on: June 07, 2009, 07:36:03 am »
That can definitely make a differnce, depending on the meat and how it's prepared.  For example if you're eating fried chicken and well done meat and lots of extracted oils (vegetable, coconut, olive, nuts, etc), then I can see how that would cause problems.  

Have you thought about eating rare steak?  If you upped the intake of rare cooked fatty beef, you might do better on reduced carbs.
Not sure how you eat your veggies, but there's a good case to be made for eating your them cooked instead of raw.  Too much raw veggies can give me a headache - I do fine on fruit tho - avocado, tomato, peppers, all fruit.        

113
Health / Re: migraines caused by high carb?
« on: June 07, 2009, 01:43:28 am »
Could very well be the minimal fat.  Fat and protein are the 2 most important nutrients, as they have diverse forms that cannot be manufactured in the body (unlike carbs which generally all end up the same way in the blood stream - glucose).  Fat is also a powerful source of energy, far superior to carbs.  Tho I will give you that carbs can help you gain weight.   

What kind of protein and fat did you eat on your high fat / high pro diet?  Was your carbs zero or almost zero?  Some people don't do well with that few carbs, and even so, there is generally an adjustment period.  Maybe you could try an equal carb/fat/protein ratio, and experiment from there? 

114
Exercise / Bodybuilding / Re: Insulin, Growth Hormone, bulking
« on: June 07, 2009, 01:36:25 am »
Parkour is a pretty cool way of exercising, some of those guys do some crazy cool stuff.  I know what you mean about working on an empty stomach.  It kind of sucks at first, but then you've got all this free energy once your body kicks the fat metabolism in high gear. 

I figure after a few more years of weights, I'll start focusing more on gymnastics / parkour / crossfit type stuff, tho I do a little of these about once a week.   

115
Off Topic / Re: You know you're an RPDer when...
« on: June 04, 2009, 10:52:19 am »
haha

or

... when you bite off chunks of meat and toss them on the floor for your cat to eat randomly throughout the day.

also

... when you're introduced to someone new and they're like, "oh so you're the guy who eats raw meat."

116
Exercise / Bodybuilding / Re: Insulin, Growth Hormone, bulking
« on: June 04, 2009, 10:45:48 am »
I've been working specifically on improving pull ups for about a month and a half, and I'm up to 4 pull ups, and I've remained at the same weight. I used to get inflated looking when I was eating more honey and fruits, but now I eat barely any fruit, sometimes some berries on a random day, and I feel like I'm still thin but when I actually do movements I feel stronger.

4 pullups is pretty good.  Do you ever do pushups?  How many can you do?

117
Exercise / Bodybuilding / Re: Insulin, Growth Hormone, bulking
« on: June 04, 2009, 10:22:49 am »
Bare minimum of several months?  What kind of reasoning do you use to arrive at this?  When I tried raw vegan (mostly), it didn't take me months to figure out just what it was doing to muscle gain (among other things).  It took a week or so. 

The nature of a cyclical ketogenic diet is such that it manipulates hormones to cause a quick glycogen supercompensation reaction.  The glycogen depleted muscle cells become very insulin sensitive for a 24-48 hour window, where they pack in all the water and glycogen possible - if you feed them correctly.  The induced expansion promotes cell division; additionally, a super hydrated state seems to promote anabolism.  Hightened insulin drives protein into the cells and promotes protein sythesis.  And for some odd reason, even growth hormone surges despite the insulin.  This occurs over the course of a couple days.  After that short window you immediately go back to eating no or very low carbs, to get back in ketosis - haven't eaten any carbs since Sunday evening. 

Now I do realize most of the weight and size was just water and glycogen (my weight has re-stabalized at about 3/4 pounds heavier), and that you can't exactly achieve body recomposition in a few weeks (w/o steriods and other drugs); but ask any trainer and they will tell you that you want to be progressing little by little each week.  And there's no doubt, I gained a good bit of strength over those few days - hitting a personal max Monday on quite a few exercises and with better form.  I got in a good lower body workout yesterday, and today I have been eating ALOT of steak, at least 2.5 if not 3 lb so far, probably I'll eat more before bed.  I have found that repeated hunger and eating throughout the day is a good sign that my cells are happily growing. 

I would agree that it could take a couple months of evaluation to determine if this is consistent and reliable, and to achieve some really noticeable differences, but there's no reason you can't make some preliminary observations/judgements on a new routine or program after a few days, especially if it's designed as sort of a shock therapy like this.   

118
Exercise / Bodybuilding / Re: Insulin, Growth Hormone, bulking
« on: June 03, 2009, 10:44:37 am »
Well I finally did a more controlled carb up.  Not as controlled as I should have; I ate too many carbs, and instead of all going to muscle glycogen, some ended up as fat.  But I definitely gained a good bit of strength and size.   

I'm going to try again either Friday or Sat morning, and make sure to regulate the carb intake a little better.  I realize the amount and even type of carbs I'm eating is not entirely paleo.  What can I say, I'm a sinner.  I tried putting on mass with the low/no carb, but I couldn't really do it as well as I'd hoped. 

I think it's probable that when fruits become available - mostly in the fall - we probably ate quite a few carbs in our paleo days.  It would be a trigger for storing fat and nutrients for the winter time.  Carbs do help you put on fat, that's for sure.   

119
Off Topic / Re: Where's everybody living?
« on: May 31, 2009, 03:41:03 am »
Las Vegas

120
Restaurants you can eat raw fish off naked women, nothing wrong with that.  And if you work your way over to the bar, the drinks all come in the form of body shots.  giggity!

I did hear a phrase you can use in a restaurant to get a steak cooked like 10 secs on each side: "cold and on a cold plate."  Haven't tried it, I will next time I go out.     

121
There appears to have been something weird happen with my post earlier.  Not sure how, but quite a bit of what I wrote got garbled:  pre-workout became reworked, non-starchy became 'cornstarch', carb became 'crab'.    etc.  anyways, maybe something for the moderators to take a look at.

122
Health / Re: Cause of Heart Disease?
« on: May 27, 2009, 10:09:20 am »
Protein Power by Dr. Eades.  He attributes most of it to the overconsumption of carbs which causes hyperinsulimia (sp?).  Insulin induces the overproduction of bad cholesterol, thickening of the smooth muscle cells in your arteries, obesity, and a host of other metabolic consequences that contribute to heart disease, among other things.  I'm sure that overheated fats are also a factor, but I'm not knowledgable on the science behind AGEs and the other bi-products.

I am fairly confident that a low carb diet will prevent heart disease, even if the meat is moderately cooked (as opposed to a cooked diet low in fat and high in carbs).  Of course raw is optimal for prevention of heart disease as you get the best of both worlds.


123
General Discussion / Re: time of day and your digestion
« on: May 27, 2009, 09:51:09 am »
The only thing that seems to determine my optimal digestive capability is hunger.  Thus, I only eat when definitely hungry.  Sometimes this is at 9 in the morning, sometimes I won't eat till evening.  Usually it is in relation to work out intensity, and how many days in a row.  Also, I get more hungry when I've had less sleep, but I don't seem to digest as well.

124
Suggestion Box / Re: Maybe a hygiene or cosmetic section?
« on: May 27, 2009, 09:21:24 am »
I lather up with coconut oil before a shower, and then squeeze either lemon, lime, or orange juice on my skin.  Leave a fresh citrus smell.  Also, coconut oil is a good hair product.

125
General Discussion / Re: Psychological changes on Raw Paleo
« on: May 27, 2009, 09:14:06 am »
sharper, clearer, faster recall of information.  Much of that comes just from sleeping better and having more energy in the day.  I suspect some of it comes from removing the toxic effects of cooked and processed foods.  Calmer, more balanced, and generally more steady state, as opposed to larger swings in mood/energy. 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10
SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk