It looks like that honey is being advertised as cold extracted, if Google translator is working well, which means that at least one German honey maker (that perhaps some members of the beekeeper association sell their honeys to and meet their standards) does think there's a difference in the temperatures of some processing methods, yes?

Not sure, there are bunch of honeys which say cold extracted. Specifically for heather honey it might be relevant, because I read that it's a very specific honey (thixotropic) and cold extraction is pretty hard requiring methods like a bunch of needles in each hole of the comb rotating in order to make it fluid, or alternatively by pressing the comb. And this one was really expensive (10 eur for 0.5kg), probably because of the involved extraction process.

I've had stomach ache with most honeys as far as I remember, but maybe I just haven't found the one for me yet This one is heather honey.

One hour later the stomach pain is gone and I feel like very slightly drunk and happy hah. Interesting stuff.

Looks like a copy of http://www.waiworld.com/waisays/food/zombiefood.html

I don't get it how you folks don't understand that she doesn't need someone telling her whether she looks fine or not.
And yeah right wodgina, her opinion isn't reality but yours is.

On a German website I read that all honey is cold extracted (at least in Germany, for the past 100 years), at 37C which is enough to losen up the wax, and that "raw honey" is just dishonest marketing strategy from bee keepers. Couldn't find more info, anyone knows more?

http://www.imker-badschwalbach.de/kaltgeschleudert.html

So where do you get your foods in general? We have been having a hard time finding grassfed meat. We found one seller that is affordable, but she is not shipping our order for some reason...

Mostly at the farmers market, where local farms come to sell their products 2-3 times a week. Isn't there some Wochenmarkt around your place?
There is a farm that carries grass-fed beef at my market, it's about 1.5x more expensive than regular beef from the supermarket.

That is very cheap, we would pay about 8 bucks here and it is not even a kilo.

Chicken - I heard the bones are not suitable for dogs because they can break into little sharp pieces?

8 bucks in Germany? I buy Kleinfleisch for 1 euro or so. You can slow cook it and then the bones get very soft.

Yeah he seems to think that only the most expensive grass-fed in the wild mountains meat and organs are worth eating, and everything else is worse than SAD. Sounds like a bad excuse to me too.

Sounds like you're getting enough weight lifting with that little guy

Brain fog means you're probably not very tolerant to carbs and you're pretty much doing low carb? Have you measured how much carbs you eat per day? Carrots and fruits doesn't sounds like much, especially because you need a fortune to eat enough calories from fruits, and you said money is restricted.

It's a fact that when eating raw diet you will absorb LESS calories, that's what many studies have shown. E.g. when eating raw fish you'll absorb less protein than when eating it cooked. My take on it is that you need some time to adapt to fully digesting raw foods, maybe months for some but years for others, which is why these studies found what they found, because they were mostly done on people who've never eaten raw meat or fish or eggs before in their life. So maybe you're just still in this adaptation phase. Or maybe you're badly doing a low carb. Or maybe it's that celiac possibility. No clue about Hashimoto though, maybe someone can comment.

Try some weightlifting, otherwise it's pretty much impossible to get fatter on this diet (unless you're naturally big/fat).
I have the exact same problem with weight, but I'd rather be thin and feel good than stuff myself with bread or dairy or whatever and feel crappy, just so that I look better to others.
Most here won't understand that those like us that are naturally thin, end up REALLY thin on this diet. I'm 1.9m tall male and 73kg.. fucking marathon runners are bigger.

The viruses and bacteria involved in the genesis of most so-called infectious diseases are regarded as vectors and partners in genetically encoded symbiotic processes, so as to help the body clear molecules alien to organic function inside actual cells.

It's a weak theory, which may explain why it's not widely accepted. It should work in all cases, or say exactly in which it works or doesn't. According to the theory, the body obviously benefits from most viruses and bacteria, but how do they benefit from helping the body? Might be a pure coincidence, a side-effect that these bad molecules are cleared up in the effort of fighting the virus itself. I can not imagine that the body doesn't have the mechanisms to do this cleanup itself, but needs help from 3rd party organisms. I could accept that now we constantly face novel toxins, from cooking, industry, etc. so maybe this would make sense, but what about a million years ago? There were certainly viruses and bacteria back then as well how were they helping if we were already doing all natural, wild instincto?

Anyway, let's not hijack the thread, which is about hormone optimization

You make kind of funny paralells IMHO aLpt.... LOL

Ok at least funny is still better than bad..

Imagine how bad people are off these times when everyone fears bacterias and viruses so much.. uh!

Rightly so in my opinion, most people's immune systems are so detrained because we live in isolated, pasteurized, sterilized environments, so pathogens could easily cause harm. Plus when people get even the smallest infection they immediately go to antibiotics or similar medications, rather than letting the immune system handle it, which further increases vulnerability.
Raw food diet helps a bit as your immune system is more often challenged and you're much more used and resistant to bacteria and parasites.